The DOI matches its Crossref record; 152 of the 152 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Injectable hydrogel materials for spinal cord regeneration: a review
Open accessAbstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) presents a complex regenerative problem due to the multiple facets of growth inhibition that occur following trauma to the cord parenchyma and stroma. Clinically, SCI is further complicated by the heterogeneity in the size, shape and extent of human injuries. Many of these injuries do not breach the dura mater and have continuous viable axons through the injury site that can later lead to some degree of functional recovery. In these cases, surgical manipulation of the spinal cord by implanting a preformed scaffold or drug delivery device may lead to further damage. Given these circumstances, in situ-forming scaffolds are an attractive approach for SCI regeneration. These synthetic and natural polymers undergo a rapid transformation from liquid to gel upon injection into the cord tissue, conforming to the individual lesion site and directly integrating with the host tissue. Injectable materials can be formulated to have mechanical properties that closely match the native spinal cord extracellular matrix, and this may enhance axonal ingrowth. Such materials can also be loaded with cellular and molecular therapeutics to modulate the wound environment and enhance regeneration. This review will focus on the current status of in situ-forming materials for spinal cord repair. The advantages of, and requirements for, such polymers will be presented, and examples of the behavior of such systems in vitro and in vivo will be presented. There are helpful lessons to be learned from the investigations of injectable hydrogels for the treatment of SCI that apply to the use of these biomaterials for the treatment of lesions in other central nervous system tissues and in organs comprising other tissue types.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate
Discher, D. E., Janmey, P., & Wang, Y.-L. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1116995 · Cited by 6,382
Hydrogels in drug delivery: Progress and challenges
Hoare, T. R., & Kohane, D. S. (2008) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2008.01.027 · Cited by 3,776
Cell Movement Is Guided by the Rigidity of the Substrate
Lo, C.-M., Wang, H.-B., Dembo, M., & Wang, Y.-L. (2000) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(00)76279-5 · Cited by 3,289
Mechanisms and Genes of Cellular Suicide
Steller, H. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7878463 · Cited by 2,479
Alginate hydrogels as synthetic extracellular matrix materials
Rowley, J. A., Madlambayan, G., & Mooney, D. J. (1999) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(98)00107-0 · Cited by 2,342
Selective Differentiation of Neural Progenitor Cells by High-Epitope Density Nanofibers
Silva, G. A., Czeisler, C., Niece, K. L., Beniash, E., Harrington, D. A., Kessler, J. A., & Stupp, S. I. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093783 · Cited by 2,169
David, S., & Aguayo, A. J. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6171034 · Cited by 1,683
Mechanical Properties of Lungs
Mead, J. (1961) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1961.41.2.281 · Cited by 1,636
Reactive Astrocytes Protect Tissue and Preserve Function after Spinal Cord Injury
Faulkner, J. R., Herrmann, J. E., Woo, M. J., Tansey, K. E., Doan, N. B., & Sofroniew, M. V. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3547-03.2004 · Cited by 1,598
Glial inhibition of CNS axon regeneration
Yiu, G., & He, Z. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1956 · Cited by 1,495
Cited by
25th Anniversary Article: Rational Design and Applications of Hydrogels in Regenerative Medicine
Annabi, N., Tamayol, A., Uquillas, J. A., Akbari, M., Bertassoni, L. E., Cha, C., Camci‐Unal, G., Dokmeci, M. R., Peppas, N. A., & Khademhosseini, A. (2014) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201303233 · Cited by 1,409
Self-Healing Injectable Hydrogels for Tissue Regeneration
Bertsch, P., Diba, M., Mooney, D. J., & Leeuwenburgh, S. C. G. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00179 · Cited by 892
Chitosan based hydrogels and their applications for drug delivery in wound dressings: A review
Hamedi, H., Moradi, S., Hudson, S. M., & Tonelli, A. E. (2018) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.114 · Cited by 759
Hydrogel as a bioactive material to regulate stem cell fate
Tsou, Y.-H., Khoneisser, J., Huang, P.-C., & Xu, X. (2016) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2016.05.001 · Cited by 317
Remote Magnetic Orientation of 3D Collagen Hydrogels for Directed Neuronal Regeneration
Antman-Passig, M., & Shefi, O. (2016) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00131 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Macaya, D., & Spector, M.
- Venue
- Biomedical Materials
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2012-01-13
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 012001
- ISSN
- 1748-6041 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-605X
- OpenAlex
- W2111199947
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 152
- FWCI
- 10.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Injectable hydrogel materials for spinal cord regeneration: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1748-6041/7/1/012001
- The paper
- Macaya, D., & Spector, M. (2012). Injectable hydrogel materials for spinal cord regeneration: a review. Biomedical Materials. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/7/1/012001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.