CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 155Bacterial Infections and VaccinesInfectious Encephalopathies and EncephalitisTraumatic Brain Injury Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuropsychological sequelae of bacterial and viral meningitis

Schmidt, H., Heimann, B., Djukic, M., Mazurek, C., Fels, C., Wallesch, C.-W., Nau, R.·2006·Brain
DOI 10.1093/brain/awh711
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Survivors of meningitis often complain about neurological and neuropsychological consequences. In this study, the extent of these sequelae was quantified and correlated to MRI findings. Neurological, neuropsychological and neuroradiological examinations were performed with adult patients younger than 70 years, 1-12 years after recovery from bacterial meningitis (BM; n = 59), or from viral meningitis (VM; n = 59). Patients with other potential causes for neuropsychological deficits (e.g. alcoholism) were carefully excluded. Patients were compared to 30 healthy subjects adjusted for age, gender and length of school education. With the exception of attention functions, both patient groups showed more frequently pathological results than the control group for all domains examined. Applying an overall cognitive sum score, patients after BM did not differ significantly in their performance from patients after VM. Separate analyses of various cognitive domains, however, revealed a higher rate of persistent disturbances in short-term and working memory after BM than after VM. Moreover, patients after BM exhibited greater impairment of executive functions. Associative learning of verbal material was also reduced. These deficits could not be ascribed to impaired alertness functions or decreased motivation in BM patients. Applying a logistic regression model, the neuropsychological outcome was related to the neurological outcome. Patients with a Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) of <5 had more frequently impaired test results for non-verbal learning and memory. GOS was also correlated with performance in executive functions. Brain volume was lower and ventricular volume was higher in the bacterial than in the VM group, and cerebral volume and the amount of white matter lesions of patients after BM were negatively correlated with short-term and working memory. In conclusion, patients after both BM and VM with favourable outcome showed affected learning and memory functions. More patients after BM than after VM displayed pathological short-term and working memory. BM resulted in poorer performance in executive functions, language, short-term memory and verbal learning/memory tests. As a result of neurological and neuropsychological sequelae, BM with a GOS > or = 4 led to decreased activities of daily living but only a minority of patients were disabled in a way that social functions were affected. The extent of neuropsychological sequelae of BM might have been overestimated in earlier studies which often had not been controlled for comorbidity factors such as alcoholism.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awh711

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Becker M, Sturm W, Willmes K, Zimmermann P. Normierungsstudie zur Aufmerksamkeitstestbatterie (TAP) von Zimmermann und Fimm. Zeitschr Neuropsychol1996; 1: 3–15.
  2. Singer M, Teyssen S. Alkoholassoziierte Organschäden [Alcohol associated somatic hazards]. Dt Ärzteblatt2001; 98: 2109–20.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 155

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Schmidt, H., Heimann, B., Djukic, M., Mazurek, C., Fels, C., Wallesch, C.-W., & Nau, R.
Affiliations
University of Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Schmidt, H.
ORCID
Venue
Brain
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2005-12-19
Volume
129
Issue
2
Pages
333-345
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
DOI
10.1093/brain/awh711
OpenAlex
W2063172274
Cited by
155
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
bacterial meningitis, viral meningitis, post-infectious neurological sequelae, neuropsychological deficits, short-term memory, working memory, executive function, verbal learning and memory, white matter lesions, brain volume, ventriculomegaly, Glasgow Outcome Scale, activities of daily living
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Brain, Cognition Disorders, Depression, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Meningitis, Viral, Neuropsychological Tests, Regression Analysis, Case-Control Studies, Meningitis, Bacterial, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review