The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heterogeneity of aquaporin-4 autoimmunity and spinal cord lesions in multiple sclerosis in Japanese
Abstract
Opticospinal multiple sclerosis (OSMS) in Asians has similar features to the relapsing-remitting form of neuromyelitis optica (NMO) seen in Westerners. OSMS is suggested to be NMO based on the frequent detection of specific IgG targeting aquaporin-4 (AQP4), designated NMO-IgG. The present study sought to clarify the significance of anti-AQP4 autoimmunity in the whole spectrum of MS. Sera from 113 consecutive Japanese patients with clinically definite MS, based on the Poser criteria, were assayed for anti-AQP4 antibodies by immunofluorescence using GFP-AQP4 fusion protein-transfected HEK-293T cells. Sensitivity and specificity of the anti-AQP4 antibody assay, 83.3 and 100%, respectively, were calculated using serum samples with NMO-IgG status predetermined at the Mayo Clinic. The anti-AQP4 antibody positivity rate was significantly higher in OSMS patients (13/48, 27.1%) than those with CMS (3/54, 5.6%), other neurological diseases (0/52) or healthy controls (0/35). None of the 11 patients tested with a brainstem-spinal form of MS were positive. Among OSMS patients, the antibody positivity rate was highest in OSMS patients with longitudinally extensive spinal cord lesions (LESCLs) extending over three vertebral segments and brain lesions that fulfilled the Barkhof criteria (5/9, 55.6%). Multiple logistic analyses revealed that emergence of the anti-AQP4 antibody was positively associated only with a higher relapse rate, but not with optic-spinal presentation or LESCLs. Compared with anti-AQP4 antibody-negative CMS patients, anti-AQP4 antibody-positive MS patients showed significantly higher frequencies of severe optic neuritis, acute transverse myelitis and LESCLs while most conditions were also common to anti-AQP4 antibody-negative OSMS patients. The LESCLs in anti-AQP4 antibody-positive patients were located at the upper-to-middle thoracic cord, while those in anti-AQP4 antibody-negative OSMS patients appeared throughout the cervical-to-thoracic cord. On axial planes, the former most frequently showed central grey matter involvement, while holocord involvement was predominant in the latter. In contrast, LESCLs in anti-AQP4 antibody-negative CMS patients preferentially involved the mid-cervical cord presenting a peripheral white matter-predominant pattern, as seen in the short lesions. Anti-AQP4 antibody-positive MS patients fulfilling definite NMO criteria showed female preponderance, higher relapse rate, greater frequency of brain lesions and less frequent responses to interferon beta-1b than anti-AQP4 antibody-negative OSMS patients with LESCLs. These findings suggested that LESCLs are distinct in anti-AQP4 antibody positivity and clinical phenotypes. There were cases of anti-AQP4 antibody-positive MS/NMO distinct from CMS, and anti-AQP4 antibody-negative OSMS with LESCLs in Japanese. This indicated that the mechanisms producing LESCLs are also heterogeneous in cases with optic-spinal presentation, namely AQP4 autoimmunity-related and -unrelated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011
Cited by
Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria
Polman, C. H., Reingold, S. C., Banwell, B., Clanet, M., Cohen, J. A., Filippi, M., Fujihara, K., Havrdova, E., Hutchinson, M., Kappos, L., et al. (2011) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.22366 · Cited by 9,802
Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: a consensus approach
Miller, D., Weinshenker, B., Filippi, M., Banwell, B., Cohen, J., Freedman, M., Galetta, S., Hutchinson, M., Johnson, R., Kappos, L., et al. (2008) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal · doi:10.1177/1352458508096878 · Cited by 642
Self-citationTreatment of neuromyelitis optica: state-of-the-art and emerging therapies
Papadopoulos, M. C., Bennett, J. L., & Verkman, A. S. (2014) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2014.141 · Cited by 262
The clinical spectrum and immunobiology of parainfectious neuromyelitis optica (Devic) syndromes
Sellner, J., Hemmer, B., & Mühlau, M. (2010) · Journal of Autoimmunity · doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2009.09.013 · Cited by 142
Immunology of neuromyelitis optica: a T cell-B cell collaboration
Mitsdoerffer, M., Kuchroo, V., & Korn, T. (2013) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12118 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Matsuoka, T., Matsushita, T., Kawano, Y., Osoegawa, M., Ochi, H., Ishizu, T., Minohara, M., Kikuchi, H., Mihara, F., Ohyagi, Y., & Kira, J.-I.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-04-02
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1206-1223
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2139230166
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heterogeneity of aquaporin-4 autoimmunity and spinal cord lesions in multiple sclerosis in Japanese. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awm027
- The paper
- Matsuoka, T., Matsushita, T., Kawano, Y., Osoegawa, M., Ochi, H., Ishizu, T., Minohara, M., Kikuchi, H., Mihara, F., Ohyagi, Y., & Kira, J.-I. (2007). Heterogeneity of aquaporin-4 autoimmunity and spinal cord lesions in multiple sclerosis in Japanese. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.