Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Motor procedural learning in Parkinson's disease

Muslimovic, D., Post, B., Speelman, J. D., Schmand, B.·2007·Brain

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging research has repeatedly implicated the striatum in motor procedural learning, but attempts to explore this relation in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) have yielded inconsistent results. Furthermore, the functional impact of procedural learning impairment is unknown. The present study sought to examine the effects of PD on procedural learning and to determine whether impaired procedural learning affects functional status. The performance of 95 non-demented PD patients on the serial reaction time task (SRTT) was compared with that of 44 demographically matched control subjects. The SRTT is a four-choice reaction time task in which visual stimuli are presented in six blocks of 100 trials either in a repeating sequence of 10 stimuli or randomly. Learning was inferred from the reduction of response times over five successive blocks of repeating sequence trials and from the increase in response times in the sixth random block. In addition, neuropsychological tests of declarative memory, executive and visuospatial functions were administered to all participants. Patients also received quantitative ratings of functional outcome. The two groups did not differ in the learning rate across blocks of repeating sequence trials. However, PD patients were significantly less efficient than controls in acquiring sequence-specific knowledge, although this impairment was relatively small (d = 0.38). Patients with more advanced clinical symptoms tended to show worse performance. Separate analyses of a subgroup of 24 non-medicated patients in the early stages of PD revealed no differences in SRTT performance relative to controls. Neuropsychological testing showed impairments in attention and executive functions, immediate and delayed explicit memory and visuospatial skills in the PD group, but none of the cognitive measures were related to procedural learning. Reduced motor sequence learning in PD patients did not influence their functional status. These findings indicate that procedural learning impairment is not an early feature of PD, but is likely to emerge with progression of the disease, independently of cognitive dysfunction or dopaminergic medication.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awm211

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Muslimovic, D., Post, B., Speelman, J. D., & Schmand, B.
Venue
Brain
Published
2007-04-05
Volume
130
Issue
11
Pages
2887-2897
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2127894602
Cited by
166
References
8
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motor procedural learning in Parkinson's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awm211
The paper
Muslimovic, D., Post, B., Speelman, J. D., & Schmand, B. (2007). Motor procedural learning in Parkinson's disease. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm211

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.