The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
White matter integrity and cognition in chronic traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a serious public health problem. Even injuries classified as mild, the most common, can result in persistent neurobehavioural impairment. Diffuse axonal injury is a common finding after TBI, and is presumed to contribute to outcomes, but may not always be apparent using standard neuroimaging. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a more recent method of assessing axonal integrity in vivo. The primary objective of the current investigation was to characterize white matter integrity utilizing DTI across the spectrum of chronic TBI of all severities. A secondary objective was to examine the relationship between white matter integrity and cognition. Twenty mild, 17 moderate to severe TBI and 18 controls underwent DTI and neuropsychological testing. Fractional anisotropy, axial diffusivity and radial diffusivity were calculated from the DTI data. Fractional anisotropy was the primary measure of white matter integrity. Region of interest analysis included anterior and posterior corona radiata, cortico-spinal tracts, cingulum fibre bundles, external capsule, forceps minor and major, genu, body and splenium of the corpus callosum, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, superior longitudinal fasciculus and sagittal stratum. Cognitive domain scores were calculated from executive, attention and memory testing. Decreased fractional anisotropy was found in all 13 regions of interest for the moderate to severe TBI group, but only in the cortico-spinal tract, sagittal stratum and superior longitudinal fasciculus for the mild TBI group. White Matter Load (a measure of the total number of regions with reduced FA) was negatively correlated with all cognitive domains. Analysis of radial and axial diffusivity values suggested that all severities of TBI can result in a degree of axonal damage, while irreversible myelin damage was only apparent for moderate to severe TBI. The present data emphasize that white matter changes exist on a spectrum, including mild TBI. An index of global white matter neuropathology (White Matter Load) was related to cognitive function, such that greater white matter pathology predicted greater cognitive deficits. Mechanistically, mild TBI white matter changes may be primarily due to axonal damage as opposed to myelin damage. The more severe injuries impact both. DTI provides an objective means for determining the relationship of cognitive deficits to TBI, even in cases where the injury was sustained years prior to the evaluation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
Dysmyelination revealed through MRI as increased radial (but unchanged axial) diffusion of water
Song, S.-K., Sun, S.-W., Ramsbottom, M. J., Chang, C., Russell, J., & Cross, A. H. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1267 · Cited by 2,582
Paced Auditory Serial-Addition Task: A Measure of Recovery from Concussion
Gronwall, D. M. A. (1977) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1977.44.2.367 · Cited by 2,395 · cited 5×
“M SEM M SEM M SEM MTBI M/STBI M/STBI Executive measures executive domain 0.00 0.15 0.37 0.14 0.87 0.14 <0.001 0.075 <0.001 0.016 Tower of London (total moves) 101.89 4.03 98.20 3.49 99.65 3.24 0.764 0.491 0.670 0.766 Stroop color-word [age-corrected (s)] 52.22 2.74 45.30 2.28 38.12 2.98 0.002 0.059 0.001 0.060 PASAT t…”
MethodInfluentialDefinition of mild traumatic brain injury
&NA;, &. (1993) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/00001199-199309000-00010 · Cited by 1,910
Song, S.-K., Sun, S.-W., Ju, W.-K., Lin, S.-J., Cross, A. H., & Neufeld, A. H. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.005 · Cited by 1,738
The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury: a review
Bruns, J., & Hauser, W. A. (2003) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1046/j.1528-1157.44.s10.3.x · Cited by 1,271
Serial MRI and neurobehavioural findings after mild to moderate closed head injury.
Levin, H. S., Williams, D. H., Eisenberg, H. M., High, W. M., & Guinto, F. C. (1992) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.55.4.255 · Cited by 245
Cited by
Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in athletes: Progressive tauopathy after repetitive head injury
McKee, A. C., Cantu, R. C., Nowinski, C. J., Hedley-Whyte, E. T., Gavett, B. E., Budson, A. E., Santini, V. E., Lee, H.-S., Kubilus, C. A., & Stern, R. A. (2009) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/nen.0b013e3181a9d503 · Cited by 2,295
Semple, B. D., Blomgren, K., Gimlin, K., Ferriero, D. M., & Noble-Haeusslein, L. J. (2013) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.04.001 · Cited by 2,132
The New Neurometabolic Cascade of Concussion
Giza, C. C., & Hovda, D. A. (2014) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000000505 · Cited by 1,353
Salience network integrity predicts default mode network function after traumatic brain injury
Bonnelle, V., Ham, T. E., Leech, R., Kinnunen, K. M., Mehta, M. A., Greenwood, R. J., & Sharp, D. J. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1113455109 · Cited by 606
The chronic and evolving neurological consequences of traumatic brain injury
Wilson, L., Stewart, W., Dams-O'Connor, K., Diaz-Arrastia, R., Horton, L., Menon, D. K., & Polinder, S. (2017) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30279-x · Cited by 607
Metadata
- Authors
- Kraus, M. F., Susmaras, T., Caughlin, B. P., Walker, C. J., Sweeney, J. A., & Little, D. M.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-10-01
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2508-2519
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2129285116
- Cited by
- 994
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 33.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.