The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Autologous olfactory ensheathing cell transplantation in human paraplegia: a 3-year clinical trial
Open accessAbstract
Olfactory ensheathing cells show promise in preclinical animal models as a cell transplantation therapy for repair of the injured spinal cord. This is a report of a clinical trial of autologous transplantation of olfactory ensheathing cells into the spinal cord in six patients with complete, thoracic paraplegia. We previously reported on the methods of surgery and transplantation and the safety aspects of the trial 1 year after transplantation. Here we address the overall design of the trial and the safety of the procedure, assessed during a period of 3 years following the transplantation surgery. All patients were assessed at entry into the trial and regularly during the period of the trial. Clinical assessments included medical, psychosocial, radiological and neurological, as well as specialized tests of neurological and functional deficits (standard American Spinal Injury Association and Functional Independence Measure assessments). Quantitative test included neurophysiological tests of sensory and motor function below the level of injury. The trial was a Phase I/IIa design whose main aim was to test the feasibility and safety of transplantation of autologous olfactory ensheathing cells into the injured spinal cord in human paraplegia. The design included a control group who did not receive surgery, otherwise closely matched to the transplant recipient group. This group acted as a control for the assessors, who were blind to the treatment status of the patients. The control group also provided the opportunity for preliminary assessment of the efficacy of the transplantation. There were no adverse findings 3 years after autologous transplantation of olfactory ensheathing cells into spinal cords injured at least 2 years prior to transplantation. The magnetic resonance images (MRIs) at 3 years showed no change from preoperative MRIs or intervening MRIs at 1 and 2 years, with no evidence of any tumour of introduced cells and no development of post-traumatic syringomyelia or other adverse radiological findings. There were no significant functional changes in any patients and no neuropathic pain. In one transplant recipient, there was an improvement over 3 segments in light touch and pin prick sensitivity bilaterally, anteriorly and posteriorly. We conclude that transplantation of autologous olfactory ensheathing cells into the injured spinal cord is feasible and is safe up to 3 years of post-implantation, however, this conclusion should be considered preliminary because of the small number of trial patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/9.3_part_1.179 · Cited by 18,540
Catz, A., Itzkovich, M., Agranov, E., Ring, H., & Tamir, A. (2001) · Spinal Cord · doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101118 · Cited by 111
Cited by
Ahuja, C. S., Wilson, J. R., Nori, S., Kotter, M. R. N., Druschel, C., Curt, A., & Fehlings, M. G. (2017) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.18 · Cited by 2,441
Introduction to Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
Kolios, G., & Moodley, Y. (2013) · Respiration · doi:10.1159/000345615 · Cited by 555
A First-in-Human, Phase I Study of Neural Stem Cell Transplantation for Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Curtis, E., Martin, J. R., Gabel, B., Sidhu, N., Rzesiewicz, T. K., Mandeville, R., Van Gorp, S., Leerink, M., Tadokoro, T., Marsala, S., et al. (2018) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2018.05.014 · Cited by 377
Restoration of sensorimotor functions after spinal cord injury
Dietz, V., & Fouad, K. (2014) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awt262 · Cited by 288
Cell-based and stem-cell-based treatments for spinal cord injury: evidence from clinical trials
Zipser, C. M., Cragg, J. J., Guest, J. D., Fehlings, M. G., Jutzeler, C. R., Anderson, A. J., & Curt, A. (2022) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(21)00464-6 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Mackay-Sim, A., Feron, F., Cochrane, J., Bassingthwaighte, L., Bayliss, C., Davies, W., Fronek, P., Gray, C., Kerr, G., Licina, P., Nowitzke, A., Perry, C., Silburn, P. A. S., Urquhart, S., & Geraghty, T.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-08-21
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2376-2386
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2148336088
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autologous olfactory ensheathing cell transplantation in human paraplegia: a 3-year clinical trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awn173
- The paper
- Mackay-Sim, A., Feron, F., Cochrane, J., Bassingthwaighte, L., Bayliss, C., Davies, W., Fronek, P., Gray, C., Kerr, G., Licina, P., Nowitzke, A., Perry, C., Silburn, P. A. S., Urquhart, S., & Geraghty, T. (2008). Autologous olfactory ensheathing cell transplantation in human paraplegia: a 3-year clinical trial. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn173
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.