The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Subtypes of progressive aphasia: application of the international consensus criteria and validation using β-amyloid imaging
Abstract
Primary progressive aphasia comprises a heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative conditions with diverse clinical profiles and underlying pathological substrates. A major development has been the publication of the recent International Consensus Criteria for the three major variants namely: semantic, non-fluent/agrammatic and logopenic. The logopenic variant is assumed to represent an atypical presentation of Alzheimer pathology although evidence for this is, at present, limited. The semantic and non-fluent/agrammatic variants are largely associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 and tau pathology, respectively. The applicability of the International Consensus Criteria to an unselected clinical sample is unknown and no agreed clinical evaluation scale on which to derive the diagnosis exists. We assessed 47 consecutive cases of primary progressive aphasic seen over a 3-year period in a specialist centre, using a newly developed progressive aphasia language scale. A subgroup of 30 cases underwent (11)C-labelled Pittsburgh Compound B positron emission tomography imaging, a putative biomarker of Alzheimer's disease that detects β-amyloid accumulation, and they were compared with an age-matched group (n = 10) with typical, predominately amnestic Alzheimer's disease. The application of an algorithm based on four key speech and language variables (motor speech disorders, agrammatism, single-word comprehension and sentence repetition) classified 45 of 47 (96%) of patients and showed high concordance with the gold standard expert clinical diagnosis based on the International Consensus Criteria. The level of neocortical β-amyloid burden varied considerably across aphasic variants. Of 13 logopenic patients, 12 (92%) had positive β-amyloid uptake. In contrast, one of nine (11%) semantic variant and two of eight (25%) non-fluent/agrammatic cases were positive. The distribution of β-amyloid across cortical regions of interest was identical in cases with the logopenic variant to that of patients with typical Alzheimer's disease although the total load was lower in the aphasic cases. Impairments of sentence repetition and sentence comprehension were positively correlated with neocortical burden of β-amyloid, whereas impaired single-word comprehension showed a negative correlation. The International Consensus Criteria can be applied to the majority of cases with primary progressive aphasic using a simple speech and language assessment scale based upon four key variables. β-amyloid imaging confirms the higher rate of Alzheimer pathology in the logopenic variant and, in turn, the low rates in the other two variants. The study offers insight into the biological basis of clinical manifestations of Alzheimer's disease, which appear topographically independent of β-amyloid load.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cortical organization of speech processing
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2113 · Cited by 5,495
Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants
Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Hillis, A. E., Weintraub, S., Kertesz, A., Mendez, M., Cappa, S. F., Ogar, J. M., Rohrer, J. D., Black, S., Boeve, B. F., et al. (2011) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31821103e6 · Cited by 5,141
Self-citationImaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer's disease with Pittsburgh Compound‐B
Klunk, W. E., Engler, H., Nordberg, A., Wang, Y., Blomqvist, G., Holt, D. P., Bergström, M., Savitcheva, I., Huang, G., Estrada, S., et al. (2004) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.20009 · Cited by 4,496
Mioshi, E., Dawson, K., Mitchell, J., Arnold, R., & Hodges, J. R. (2006) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.1610 · Cited by 2,016
Self-citationMotor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management
Duffy, J. R. (1995) · Cited by 1,892
SEMANTIC DEMENTIA: PROGRESSIVE FLUENT APHASIA WITH TEMPORAL LOBE ATROPHY
HODGES, J. R., PATTERSON, K., OXBURY, S., & FUNNELL, E. (1992) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/115.6.1783 · Cited by 1,710
Self-citationCognition and anatomy in three variants of primary progressive aphasia
Gorno‐Tempini, M. L., Dronkers, N. F., Rankin, K. P., Ogar, J. M., Phengrasamy, L., Rosen, H. J., Johnson, J. K., Weiner, M. W., & Miller, B. L. (2004) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.10825 · Cited by 1,625
The Selective Impairment of Semantic Memory
Warrington, E. K. (1975) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/14640747508400525 · Cited by 1,464
Slowly progressive aphasia without generalized dementia
Mesulam, M. ‐. (1982) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410110607 · Cited by 1,243
Cairns, N. J., Bigio, E. H., Mackenzie, I. R. A., Neumann, M., Lee, V. M.-Y., Hatanpaa, K. J., White, C. L., Schneider, J. A., Grinberg, L. T., Halliday, G., et al. (2007) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-007-0237-2 · Cited by 1,110
Cited by
Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria
Dubois, B., Feldman, H. H., Jacova, C., Hampel, H., Molinuevo, J. L., Blennow, K., DeKosky, S. T., Gauthier, S., Selkoe, D., Bateman, R., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70090-0 · Cited by 3,321
Self-citationLinguistic Features Identify Alzheimer’s Disease in Narrative Speech
Fraser, K. C., Meltzer, J. A., & Rudzicz, F. (2015) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-150520 · Cited by 797
Imaging tau and amyloid-β proteinopathies in Alzheimer disease and other conditions
Villemagne, V. L., Doré, V., Burnham, S. C., Masters, C. L., & Rowe, C. C. (2018) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2018.9 · Cited by 441
Self-citationTypical and atypical pathology in primary progressive aphasia variants
Spinelli, E. G., Mandelli, M. L., Miller, Z. A., Santos‐Santos, M. A., Wilson, S. M., Agosta, F., Grinberg, L. T., Huang, E. J., Trojanowski, J. Q., Meyer, M., et al. (2017) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24885 · Cited by 409
Clinical, imaging, and pathological heterogeneity of the Alzheimer's disease syndrome
Lam, B., Masellis, M., Freedman, M., Stuss, D. T., & Black, S. E. (2013) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/alzrt155 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Leyton, C. E., Villemagne, V. L., Savage, S., Pike, K. E., Ballard, K. J., Piguet, O., Burrell, J. R., Rowe, C. C., & Hodges, J. R.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-09-09
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3030-3043
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2098108064
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 75
- FWCI
- 20.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subtypes of progressive aphasia: application of the international consensus criteria and validation using β-amyloid imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awr216
- The paper
- Leyton, C. E., Villemagne, V. L., Savage, S., Pike, K. E., Ballard, K. J., Piguet, O., Burrell, J. R., Rowe, C. C., & Hodges, J. R. (2011). Subtypes of progressive aphasia: application of the international consensus criteria and validation using β-amyloid imaging. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr216
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.