The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Restoration of sensorimotor functions after spinal cord injury
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this review is to discuss the achievements and perspectives regarding rehabilitation of sensorimotor functions after spinal cord injury. In the first part we discuss clinical approaches based on neuroplasticity, a term referring to all adaptive and maladaptive changes within the sensorimotor systems triggered by a spinal cord injury. Neuroplasticity can be facilitated through the training of movements with assistance as needed, and/or by electrical stimulation techniques. The success of such training in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury critically depends on the presence of physiological proprioceptive input to the spinal cord leading to meaningful muscle activations during movement performances. The addition of rehabilitation technology, such as robotic devices allows for longer training times and provision of feedback information regarding changes in movement performance. Nevertheless, the improvement of function by such approaches for rehabilitation is limited. In the second part, we discuss preclinical approaches to restore function by compensating for the loss of descending input to spinal networks following complete spinal cord injury. This can be achieved with stimulation of spinal networks or approaches to restore their descending input. Electrical and pharmacological stimulation of spinal neural networks is still in an experimental stage; and despite promising repair studies in animal models, translations to humans up to now have not been convincing. It is likely that combinations of techniques targeting the promotion of axonal regeneration and meaningful plasticity are necessary to advance the restoration of function. In the future, refinement of animal studies may contribute to greater translational success.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input
Courtine, G., Gerasimenko, Y., van den Brand, R., Yew, A., Musienko, P., Zhong, H., Song, B., Ao, Y., Ichiyama, R. M., Lavrov, I., et al. (2009) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2401 · Cited by 706
Publication bias in reports of animal stroke studies leads to major overstatement of efficacy
Sena, E. S., van der Worp, H. B., Bath, P. M. W., Howells, D. W., & Macleod, M. R. (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000344 · Cited by 600 · cited 4×
“Such deficiencies include a low statistical power of animal experiments with relatively small numbers of animals, resulting in the probability of false positive results (Ioannidis, 2005) and a bias to publish such positive results (Sena et al., 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialMassey, J. M., Hubscher, C. H., Wagoner, M. R., Decker, J. A., Amps, J., Silver, J., & Onifer, S. M. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5467-05.2006 · Cited by 320 · cited 2×
“Thus, epidural stimulation does not only facilitate the performance of leg movements by spared descending connections but also helps to overcome a critical threshold for activating spinal neural networks and promote meaningful plasticity.”
BackgroundReplication and reproducibility in spinal cord injury research
Steward, O., Popovich, P. G., Dietrich, W. D., & Kleitman, N. (2012) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.06.017 · Cited by 186
Beauparlant, J., van den Brand, R., Barraud, Q., Friedli, L., Musienko, P., Dietz, V., & Courtine, G. (2013) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awt204 · Cited by 130 · cited 2×
“There is also a spontaneous recovery of sensorimotor functions within the first few months after a spinal cord injury because of factors such as the resolution of neuropraxia (Curt et al., 2008) and remyelination of spared axons.”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Schwab, J. M., Zhang, Y., Kopp, M. A., Brommer, B., & Popovich, P. G. (2014) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.04.023 · Cited by 260
“Thus, infections qualify as independent neurobiological rehabilitation confounders that impair the endogenous recovery potential after SCI (Dietz and Fouad, 2014; Failli et al., 2012).”
BackgroundBlocking Autophagy in Oligodendrocytes Limits Functional Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury
Saraswat Ohri, S., Bankston, A. N., Mullins, S. A., Liu, Y., Andres, K. R., Beare, J. E., Howard, R. M., Burke, D. A., Riegler, A. S., Smith, A. E., et al. (2018) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0679-17.2018 · Cited by 70
Begenisic, T., Pavese, C., Aiachini, B., Nardone, A., & Rossi, D. (2021) · Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience · doi:10.3233/rnn-211169 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Dietz, V., & Fouad, K.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-10-07
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 654-667
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2122190640
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 11.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.