Cited by 18Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Understanding the biological basis of dyslexia at a neural systems level

Open access
Al Dahhan, Noor Z, Kirby, John R, Brien, Donald C, Gupta, Rina, Harrison, Allyson, Munoz, Douglas P·2020·Brain Communications

Abstract

We examined the naming speed performance of 18 typically achieving and 16 dyslexic adults while simultaneously recording eye movements, articulations and fMRI data. Naming speed tasks, which require participants to name a list of letters or objects, have been proposed as a proxy for reading and are thought to recruit similar reading networks in the left hemisphere of the brain as more complex reading tasks. We employed letter and object naming speed tasks, with task manipulations to make the stimuli more or less phonologically and/or visually similar. Compared to typically achieving readers, readers with dyslexia had a poorer behavioural naming speed task performance, longer fixation durations, more regressions and increased activation in areas of the reading network in the left-hemisphere. Whereas increased network activation was positively associated with performance in dyslexics, it was negatively related to performance in typically achieving readers. Readers with dyslexia had greater bilateral activation and recruited additional regions involved with memory, namely the amygdala and hippocampus; in contrast, the typically achieving readers additionally activated the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Areas within the reading network were differentially activated by stimulus manipulations to the naming speed tasks. There was less efficient naming speed behavioural performance, longer fixation durations, more regressions and increased neural activity when letter stimuli were both phonologically and visually similar. Discussion focuses on the differences in activation within the reading network, how they are related to behavioural task differences, and how progress in furthering the understanding of the relationship between behavioural performance and brain activity can change the overall trajectories of children with reading difficulties by contributing to both early identification and remediation processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa173

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reading engages the prefrontal cortex and amygdala and also modulates other regions involved in emotional and cognitive processing, such as the hippocampus and the cingulate gyrus.

    “Findings indicate that reading not only engages the prefrontal cortex and amygdala but also modulates other regions involved in emotional and cognitive processing, such as the hippocampus and the cingulate gyrus (93, 94).”

    From Recent developments in bibliotherapy for adolescent depression (2025) · cites this paper as [94]

    The Results (Neural activation during task performance; Effect of task manipulations on brain activation in ROIs; page not provided) report activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices during naming tasks, and greater amygdala and hippocampal activation for letter than object naming. The claim generalizes these task-specific findings to reading broadly; the paper does not establish that reading modulates these regions through emotional processing. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Al Dahhan N Georgiou GK Hung R Munoz D Parrila R Kirby JR. Eye-movements of university students with and without reading difficulties during naming speed tasks. Ann Dyslexia 2014; 64: 137– 50. 24723032
  2. Al Dahhan NZ Kirby JR Brien DC Munoz DP. Eye movements and articulations during a letter naming speed task: children with and without dyslexia. J Learn Disabil 2017; 50: 275– 85. 26762122
  3. Al Dahhan NZ Kirby JR Chen Y Brien DC Munoz DP. Examining the neural and cognitive processes that underlie reading through naming speed tasks. Eur J Neurosci 2020; 51: 2277– 98. 31912932
  4. Bacon AM Handley SJ. Reasoning and dyslexia: is visual memory a compensated resource? Dyslexia 2014; 20: 330– 45. 25195576
  5. Bacon AM Parmentier FBR Barr P. Visuospatial memory in dyslexia: evidence for strategic deficits. Memory 2013; 21: 189– 209. 22928929
  6. Binder JR Desai RH Graves WW Conant LL. Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex 2009; 19: 2767– 96. 19329570 PMC2774390
  7. Borowsky R Cummine J Owen WJ Friesen CK Shih F Sarty GE. FMRI of ventral and dorsal processing streams in basic reading processes: insular sensitivity to phonology. Brain Topogr 2006; 18: 233– 9. 16845597
  8. Bowers PG Newby-Clark E. The role of naming speed within a model of reading acquisition. Read Writ 2002; 15: 109– 26.
  9. Breznitz Z. Brain activity during performance of naming tasks: comparison between dyslexic and regular readers. Sci Stud Read 2005; 9: 17– 42.
  10. Brown MRG Vilis T Everling S. Frontoparietal activation with preparation for antisaccades. J Neurophysiol 2007; 98: 1751– 62. 17596416
  11. Carreiras M Armstrong BC Perea M Frost R. The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends Cogn Sci 2014; 18: 90– 8. 24373885
  12. Cattinelli I Borghese NA Gallucci M Paulesu E. Reading the reading brain: a new meta-analysis of functional imaging data on reading. J Neurolinguistics 2013; 26: 214– 38.
  13. Christoffels IK Formisano E Schiller NO. Neural correlates of verbal feedback processing: an fMRI study employing overt speech. Hum Brain Mapp 2007; 28: 868– 79. 17266104 PMC6871445
  14. Clarke P Hulme C Snowling MJ. Individual differences in RAN and reading: a response timing analysis. J Learn Disabil 2005; 28: 73– 86.
  15. Compton DL. The influence of item composition on RAN letter performance in first-grade children. J Spec Educ 2003; 37: 81– 94.
  16. Connolly JD Goodale MA Goltz HC Munoz DP. fMRI activation in the human frontal eye field is correlated with saccadic reaction time. J Neurophysiol 2005; 94: 605– 11. 15590732
  17. Connolly JD Goodale MA Menon RS Munoz DP. Human fMRI evidence for the neural correlates of preparatory set. Nat Neurosci 2002; 5: 1345– 52. 12411958
  18. Cummine J Szepesvari E Chouinard B Hanif W Georgiou GK. A functional investigation of RAN letters, digits, and objects: how similar are they? Behav Brain Res 2014; 275: 157– 65. 25172183
  19. Dehaene S Cohen L Sigman M Vinckier F. The neural code for written words: a proposal. Trends Cogn Sci 2005; 9: 335– 41. 15951224
  20. Diehl JJ Frost SJ Sherman G Mencl WE Kurian A Molfese P, et al Neural correlates of language and non-language visuospatial processing in adolescents with reading disability. NeuroImage 2014; 101: 653– 66. 25067812 PMC4167780
  21. Ford KA Goltz HC Brown MRG Everling S. Neural processes associated with antisaccade task performance investigated with event-related fMRI. J Neurophysiol 2005; 94: 429– 40. 15728770
  22. Georgiou GK Parrila R Kirby J. Rapid naming speed components and early reading acquisition. Sci Stud Read 2006; 10: 199– 220.
  23. Georgiou GK Parrila R Kirby JR. RAN components and reading development from grade 3 to grade 5: what underlies their relationship. Sci Stud Read 2009; 13: 508– 34.
  24. Gonzalez-Gerriod AA Gómez-Velázquez FR Zarabozo D Ruiz-Villeda BA de la Serna Tuya JM. Rapid automatized naming and lexical decision in children from an electrophysiological perspective. Clin EEG Neurosci 2011; 42: 14– 23. 21309438
  25. Guenther FH Ghosh SS Tourville JA. Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain Lang 2006; 96: 280– 301. 16040108 PMC1473986
  26. Guenther FH Vladusich T. A neural theory of speech acquisition and production. J Neurolinguistics 2012; 25: 408– 22. 22711978 PMC3375605
  27. He Q Xue G Chen C Chen C Lu Z-L Dong Q. Decoding the neuroanatomical basis of reading ability: a multivoxel morphometric study. J Neurosci 2013; 33: 12835– 43. 23904618 PMC3728691
  28. Hoeft F McCandliss BD Black JM Gantman A Zakerani N Hulme C, et al Neural systems predicting long-term outcome in dyslexia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108: 361– 6. 21173250 PMC3017159
  29. Hoeft F Ueno T Reiss AL Meyler A Whitfield-Gabrieli S Glover GH, et al Prediction of children’s reading skills using behavioral, functional, and structural neuroimaging measures. Behav Neurosci 2007; 121: 602– 13. 17592952
  30. Indefrey P Levelt WJM. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition 2004; 92: 101– 44. 15037128
  31. Jobard G Crivello F Tzourio-Mazoyer N. Evaluation of the dual route theory of reading: a metaanalysis of 35 neuroimaging studies. NeuroImage 2003; 20: 693– 712. 14568445
  32. Kirby JR, Savage RS. Can the simple view deal with the complexities of reading? Literacy 2008; 42: 75– 82.
  33. Kirby JR Georgiou GK Martinussen R Parrila R Bowers P Landerl K. Naming speed and reading: from prediction to instruction. Read Res Q 2010; 45: 341– 62.
  34. Kwong KK Belliveau JW Chesler DA Goldberg IE Weisskoff RM Poncelet BP, et al Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 5675– 9. 1608978 PMC49355
  35. Li JJ Cutting LE Ryan M Zilioli M Denckla MB Mahone EM. Response variability in rapid automatized naming predicts reading comprehension. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2009; 31: 877– 88. 19221923 PMC2829106
  36. Misra M Katzir T Wolf M Poldrack RA. Neural systems for rapid automatized naming in skilled readers: unraveling the RAN-reading relationship. Sci Stud Read 2004; 8: 241– 56.
  37. Norton ES Beach SD Gabrieli JDE. Neurobiology of dyslexia. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2015; 30, 73– 8. 25290881 PMC4293303
  38. Norton ES Wolf M. Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. Annu Rev Psychol 2012; 63: 427– 52. 21838545
  39. Ogawa S Lee TM Kay AR Tank DW. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87: 9868– 72. 2124706 PMC55275
  40. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9: 97– 113. 5146491
  41. Olitsky SE Nelson LB. Reading disorders in children. Pediatric Clin North Am 2003; 50: 213– 24. 12713114
  42. Paulesu E Danelli L Berlingeri M. Reading the dyslexic brain: multiple dysfunctional routes revealed by a new meta-analysis of PET and fMRI studies. Front Hum Neurosci 2014; 8: 830. 25426043 PMC4227573
  43. Perfetti C, Stafura J. Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading 2014; 18: 22.
  44. Pollack C Luk G Christodoulou JA. A meta-analysis of functional reading systems in typically developing and struggling readers across different alphabetic languages. Front Psychol 2015; 6: 191. 25806009 PMC4354279
  45. Price CJ. A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading. NeuroImage 2012; 62: 816– 47. 22584224 PMC3398395
  46. Price CJ Mechelli A. Reading and reading disturbance. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2005; 15: 231– 8. 15831408
  47. Pugh KR Mencl WE Jenner AR Katz L Frost SJ Lee JR, et al Functional neuroimaging studies of reading and reading disability (developmental dyslexia). Mental Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2000; 6: 207– 13. 10982498
  48. Pugh KR Mencl WE Jenner AR Katz L Frost SJ Lee JR, et al Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability. J Commun Disord 2001; 34: 479– 92. 11725860
  49. Rayner K. Understanding eye movements in reading. Sci Stud Read 1997; 1: 317– 39.
  50. Richlan F Kronbichler M Wimmer H. Meta-analyzing brain dysfunctions in dyslexic children and adults. NeuroImage 2011; 56: 1735– 42. 21338695
  51. Rueckl JG Paz-Alonso PM Molfese PJ Kuo W-J Bick A Frost SJ, et al Universal brain signature of proficient reading: evidence from four contrasting languages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015; 112: 15510– 5. 26621710 PMC4687557
  52. Schlagger BL McCandliss BD. Development of neural systems for reading. Annu Rev Neurosci 2007; 30: 475– 503. 17600524
  53. Shaywitz SE Mody M Shaywitz BA. Neural mechanisms in dyslexia. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2006; 15: 278– 81.
  54. Shaywitz SE Shaywitz BA. Paying attention to reading: the neurobiology of reading and dyslexia. Dev Psychopathol 2008; 20: 1329– 49. 18838044
  55. Skuldarkski P Constable RT Gore JC. ROC analysis of statistical methods used in functional MRI: individual subjects. NeuroImage 1999; 9: 311– 29. 10075901
  56. Soltysik DA, Hyde JS. Strategies for block-design fMRI experiments during task-related motion of structures of the oral cavity. NeuroImage 2006; 29: 1260. 16275020
  57. Starr MS Rayner K. Eye movements during reading: some current controversies. Trends Cogn Sci 2001; 5: 156– 63. 11287269
  58. Talairach J Tournoux P. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1988.
  59. Taylor JS Rastle K Davis MH. Can cognitive models explain brain activation during word and pseudoword reading? A meta-analysis of 36 neuroimaging studies. Psychol Bull 2013; 139: 766– 91. 23046391
  60. van der Mark S Klaver P Bucher K Maurer U Schulz E Brem S, et al The left occipitotemporal system in reading: disruption of focal fMRI connectivity to left inferior frontal and inferior parietal language areas in children with dyslexia. NeuroImage 2011; 54: 2426– 36. 20934519
  61. Wiig EH Nielsen NP Minthon L McPeek D Said K Warkentin S. Parietal lobe activation in rapid, automatized naming by adults. Percept Mot Skills 2002; 94: 1230– 44. 12186245
  62. Wolf M Bowers PG. The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. J Educ Psychol 1999; 91: 415– 38.
  63. Yan M Pan J Laubrock J Kliegl R Shu H. Parafoveal processing efficiency in rapid automatized naming: a comparison between Chinese normal and dyslexic children. J Exp Child Psychol 2013; 115: 579– 89. 23499320 PMC4020918

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al Dahhan, N. Z., Kirby, J. R., Brien, D. C., Gupta, R., Harrison, A., & Munoz, D. P.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
  • Queen's University (CA)
Venue
Brain Communications
Published
2020
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
fcaa173-fcaa173
ISSN
2632-1297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3108494137
Cited by
18
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institute of Health Research (MOP-FDN-148418)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
dyslexia, naming speed, reading network, left hemisphere, phonological similarity, visual similarity, fixation duration, regression analysis, amygdala, hippocampus, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, neural correlates of reading, early identification of reading difficulties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review