Cited by 44Estrogen and related hormone effectsBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

Antiestrogenic effects of the fetal estrogen estetrol in women with estrogen-receptor positive early breast cancer

Singer, C. F., Bennink, H. J. T. C., Natter, C., Steurer, S., Rudas, M., Moinfar, F., Appels, N., Visser, M. +1 more·2014·Carcinogenesis

Abstract

Estetrol (E4) is a fetal estrogen with estrogenic effects on reproductive organs and bone in preclinical models and in postmenopausal women. However, E4 exerts antiestrogenic effects on breast cancer (BC) cell growth in vitro and in vivo. We have investigated the effect of 14 days preoperative treatment with 20mg E4 per day on tumor proliferation markers, sex steroid receptor expression and endocrine parameters in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, preoperative window trial in 30 pre- and post-menopausal women with estrogen-receptor positive early BC. E4 had a significant pro-apoptotic effect on tumor tissue, whereas Ki67 expression remained unchanged in both pre- and post-menopausal women. E4 increased sex-hormone-binding globulin significantly thereby reducing the concentrations of bioavailable estradiol. Follicle-stimulating hormone levels decreased in postmenopausal women only and luteinizing hormone levels remained unchanged. Systemic insulin growth factor-1 levels decreased significantly. Intratumoral epithelial ERα expression decreased significantly and a trend was found towards an increased expression of ERβ. This clinical data support the preclinical findings that E4 has antiestrogenic effects on BC cells, whereas earlier studies have shown that E4 has estrogenic effects on reproductive tissues and bone. Further clinical studies seem acceptable and are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of E4 for the breast in hormone replacement therapy, including hormone replacement therapy in women who have or have had BC, especially in those BC patients treated with aromatase inhibitors and suffering from serious complaints due to estrogen deficiency.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/carcin/bgu144

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chemically synthesized E4 is identical to the natural hormone.

    “Chemically synthesized E4 is identical to the natural hormone and has been studied in contraception, menopause, osteoporosis, and breast cancer [9-11] .”

    From Endocrine and metabolic effects of an oral contraceptive containing estetrol and drospirenone (2021) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) identifies E4 as a natural estrogen synthesized by the human fetal liver and discusses its use as an oral drug. It does not say that chemically synthesized E4 is identical to the naturally produced hormone; searches for chemical synthesis and identity found no such passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • E4 has been studied in contraception, menopause, osteoporosis, and breast cancer.

    “Chemically synthesized E4 is identical to the natural hormone and has been studied in contraception, menopause, osteoporosis, and breast cancer [9-11] .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singer, C. F., Bennink, H. J. T. C., Natter, C., Steurer, S., Rudas, M., Moinfar, F., Appels, N., Visser, M., & Kubista, E.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
  • Pantarhei Bioscience (Netherlands) (NL)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Singer, C. F.
Venue
Carcinogenesis
Published
2014-07-05
Volume
35
Issue
11
Pages
2447-2451
ISSN
  • 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2180
OpenAlex
W2081199042
Cited by
44
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Carcinogenesis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
estetrol, antiestrogenic effects, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, early breast cancer, preoperative treatment, apoptosis, sex hormone-binding globulin, bioavailable estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, insulin-like growth factor I, estrogen receptor alpha, estrogen receptor beta, Ki-67, menopause, hormone replacement therapy, aromatase inhibitors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Estetrol, Female, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Humans, Insulin-Like Growth Factor I, Middle Aged, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Ki-67 Antigen, Hormone Replacement Therapy, Estrogen Receptor alpha, Preoperative Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review