Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PU.1 downregulation in murine radiation-induced acute myeloid leukaemia (AML): from molecular mechanism to human AML

Verbiest, Tom, Bouffler, Simon, Nutt, Stephen L., Badie, Christophe·2015·Carcinogenesis

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/carcin/bgv016

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Involvement of PU.1 in murine rAML and human primary AML. In mice, exposure to ionising radiation induces a first mutational hit in haematopoietic cells (interstitial deletion of one Sfpi1 gene on chromosome 2), creating pre-leukaemic cells that have a growth advantage but which are not fully malignant. Subsequently, these cells acquire a second mutational hit (point mutation in the remaining Sfpi1 copy), resulting in the formation of a leukaemic cell which undergoes further clonal expansion and eventually leads to the development of rAML. In humans, no data is currently available on the involvement of PU.1 in tAML. However, various epigenetic (A) and genetic (B) modifications, contributing towards the formation of pre-leukaemic cells, have been linked with downregulation of PU.1 in human primary AML. These pre-leukaemic cells harbour some, but not all, of the mutations found in leukaemic cells (60). Numerous pre-leukaemic and leukaemic mutations contribute towards PU.1 downregulation in human primary AML, including the top three genes found mutated in human primary AML [NPM1, FLT3, and DNMT3A (17)]. Although the molecular targets seem to differ between species, it appears that a common PU.1 downregulation pathway is affected in murine rAML and human primary AML. Future studies investigating tAML patients receiving radiotherapy alone should confirm whether PU.1 is also commonly downregulated in human tAML. Blue intensity indicates PU.1 expression/activity levels (dark equals high levels).
Figure 1. Involvement of PU.1 in murine rAML and human primary AML. In mice, exposure to ionising radiation induces a first mutational hit in haematopoietic cells (interstitial deletion of one Sfpi1 gene on chromosome 2), creating pre-leukaemic cells that have a growth advantage but which are not fully malignant. Subsequently, these cells acquire a second mutational hit (point mutation in the remaining Sfpi1 copy), resulting in the formation of a leukaemic cell which undergoes further clonal expansion and eventually leads to the development of rAML. In humans, no data is currently available on the involvement of PU.1 in tAML. However, various epigenetic (A) and genetic (B) modifications, contributing towards the formation of pre-leukaemic cells, have been linked with downregulation of PU.1 in human primary AML. These pre-leukaemic cells harbour some, but not all, of the mutations found in leukaemic cells (60). Numerous pre-leukaemic and leukaemic mutations contribute towards PU.1 downregulation in human primary AML, including the top three genes found mutated in human primary AML [NPM1, FLT3, and DNMT3A (17)]. Although the molecular targets seem to differ between species, it appears that a common PU.1 downregulation pathway is affected in murine rAML and human primary AML. Future studies investigating tAML patients receiving radiotherapy alone should confirm whether PU.1 is also commonly downregulated in human tAML. Blue intensity indicates PU.1 expression/activity levels (dark equals high levels).CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Hsu, (2013), The incidence of leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma among atomic bomb survivors: 1950–2001, Radiat. Res, 179, 361, 10.1667/RR2892.1 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Major, (1979), Induction of myeloid leukaemia by whole-body single exposure of CBA male mice to x-rays, Br. J. Cancer, 40, 903, 10.1038/bjc.1979.284 · DOI
  3. Rithidech, (1999), Advantages of the CBA mouse in leukemogenesis research, Blood Cells Mol. Dis, 25, 38, 10.1006/bcmd.1999.0225 · DOI
  4. Bouffler, (1997), Chromosome 2 hypersensitivity and clonal development in murine radiation acute myeloid leukaemia, Int. J. Radiat. Biol, 72, 181, 10.1080/095530097143400 · DOI
  5. Darakhshan, (2006), Evidence for complex multigenic inheritance of radiation AML susceptibility in mice revealed using a surrogate phenotypic assay, Carcinogenesis, 27, 311, 10.1093/carcin/bgi207 · DOI
  6. Rithidech, (1993), A specific chromosomal deletion in murine leukemic cells induced by radiation with different qualities, Exp. Hematol, 21, 427
  7. Bouffler, (1996), Chromosomal abnormalities in neutron-induced acute myeloid leukemias in CBA/H mice, Radiat. Res, 146, 349, 10.2307/3579467 · DOI
  8. Hirouchi, (2008), Upregulation of c-myc gene accompanied by PU.1 deficiency in radiation-induced acute myeloid leukemia in mice, Exp. Hematol, 36, 871, 10.1016/j.exphem.2008.01.015 · DOI
  9. Steffen, (2013), Molecular characterisation of murine acute myeloid leukaemia induced by 56Fe ion and 137Cs gamma ray irradiation, Mutagenesis, 28, 71, 10.1093/mutage/ges055 · DOI
  10. Alexander, (1995), Gene deletion explains both in vivo and in vitro generated chromosome 2 aberrations associated with murine myeloid leukemia, Leukemia, 9, 2009
  11. Silver, (1999), Molecular mapping of chromosome 2 deletions in murine radiation-induced AML localizes a putative tumor suppressor gene to a 1.0 cM region homologous to human chromosome segment 11p11-12, Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 24, 95, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199902)24:2<95::AID-GCC1>3.0.CO;2-C · DOI
  12. Peng, (2009), Radiation leukemogenesis in mice: loss of PU.1 on chromosome 2 in CBA and C57BL/6 mice after irradiation with 1 GeV/nucleon 56Fe ions, X rays or gamma rays. Part I. Experimental observations, Radiat. Res, 171, 474, 10.1667/RR1547.1 · DOI
  13. Cleary, (2001), Allelic loss on chromosome 4 (Lyr2/TLSR5) is associated with myeloid, B-lympho-myeloid, and lymphoid (B and T) mouse radiation-induced leukemias, Blood, 98, 1549, 10.1182/blood.V98.5.1549 · DOI
  14. Finnon, (2012), Flt3-ITD mutations in a mouse model of radiation-induced acute myeloid leukaemia, Leukemia, 26, 1445, 10.1038/leu.2011.377 · DOI
  15. Cook, (2004), PU.1 is a suppressor of myeloid leukemia, inactivated in mice by gene deletion and mutation of its DNA binding domain, Blood, 104, 3437, 10.1182/blood-2004-06-2234 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Jawad, (2006), Evidence for clustered tumour suppressor gene loci on mouse chromosomes 2 and 4 in radiation-induced acute myeloid leukaemia, Int. J. Radiat. Biol, 82, 383, 10.1080/09553000600784161 · DOI
  17. Suraweera, (2005), Mutations of the PU.1 Ets domain are specifically associated with murine radiation-induced, but not human therapy-related, acute myeloid leukaemia, Oncogene, 24, 3678, 10.1038/sj.onc.1208422 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, (2013), Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia, N. Engl. J. Med, 368, 2059, 10.1056/NEJMoa1301689 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Genik, (2014), Leukemogenesis in heterozygous PU.1 knockout mice, Radiat. Res, 182, 310, 10.1667/RR13738.1 · DOI
  20. Metcalf, (2006), Inactivation of PU.1 in adult mice leads to the development of myeloid leukemia, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 103, 1486, 10.1073/pnas.0510616103 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Dekkers, (2011), A two-mutation model of radiation-induced acute myeloid leukemia using historical mouse data, Radiat. Environ. Biophys, 50, 37, 10.1007/s00411-010-0328-7 · DOI
  22. Brown, (2011), Sfpi1/PU.1 mutations in mouse radiation-induced acute myeloid leukaemias affect mRNA and protein abundance and associate with disrupted transcription, Leuk. Res, 35, 126, 10.1016/j.leukres.2010.06.015 · DOI
  23. Mohrin, (2010), Hematopoietic stem cell quiescence promotes error-prone DNA repair and mutagenesis, Cell Stem Cell, 7, 174, 10.1016/j.stem.2010.06.014 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Ban, (2009), Implication of replicative stress-related stem cell ageing in radiation-induced murine leukaemia, Br. J. Cancer, 101, 363, 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605135 · DOI
  25. Hirouchi, (2011), Cell surface marker phenotypes and gene expression profiles of murine radiation-induced acute myeloid leukemia stem cells are similar to those of common myeloid progenitors, Radiat. Res, 176, 311, 10.1667/RR2374.1 · DOI
  26. Staber, (2013), Sustained PU.1 levels balance cell-cycle regulators to prevent exhaustion of adult hematopoietic stem cells, Mol. Cell, 49, 934, 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.007 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Olme, (2013), Live cell detection of chromosome 2 deletion and Sfpi1/PU1 loss in radiation-induced mouse acute myeloid leukaemia, Leuk. Res, 37, 1374, 10.1016/j.leukres.2013.05.019 · DOI
  28. Olme, (2013), Frequency of acute myeloid leukaemia-associated mouse chromosome 2 deletions in X-ray exposed immature haematopoietic progenitors and stem cells, Mutat. Res, 756, 119, 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.04.018 · DOI
  29. Chen, (1995), PU.1 (Spi-1) autoregulates its expression in myeloid cells, Oncogene, 11, 1549
  30. Okuno, (2005), Potential autoregulation of transcription factor PU.1 by an upstream regulatory element, Mol. Cell. Biol, 25, 2832, 10.1128/MCB.25.7.2832-2845.2005 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Bonadies, (2010), PU.1 is regulated by NF-kappaB through a novel binding site in a 17kb upstream enhancer element, Oncogene, 29, 1062, 10.1038/onc.2009.371 · DOI
  32. Scott, (1994), Requirement of transcription factor PU.1 in the development of multiple hematopoietic lineages, Science, 265, 1573, 10.1126/science.8079170 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Scott, (1997), PU.1 functions in a cell-autonomous manner to control the differentiation of multipotential lymphoid-myeloid progenitors, Immunity, 6, 437, 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80287-3 · DOI · Paper page
  34. McKercher, (1996), Targeted disruption of the PU.1 gene results in multiple hematopoietic abnormalities, EMBO J, 15, 5647, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00949.x · DOI · Paper page
  35. Heinz, (2010), Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities, Mol. Cell, 38, 576, 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Ghisletti, (2010), Identification and characterization of enhancers controlling the inflammatory gene expression program in macrophages, Immunity, 32, 317, 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.02.008 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Dakic, (2007), Is PU.1 a dosage-sensitive regulator of haemopoietic lineage commitment and leukaemogenesis?, Trends Immunol, 28, 108, 10.1016/j.it.2007.01.006 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Turkistany, (2011), The transcription factor PU.1 is a critical regulator of cellular communication in the immune system, Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. (Warsz), 59, 431, 10.1007/s00005-011-0147-9 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Basova, (2014), Aggressive acute myeloid leukemia in PU.1/p53 double-mutant mice, Oncogene, 33, 4735, 10.1038/onc.2013.414 · DOI
  40. Kayser, (2011), The impact of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) on outcome in 2853 adult patients with newly diagnosed AML, Blood, 117, 2137, 10.1182/blood-2010-08-301713 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Pedersen-Bjergaard, (2008), Genetics of therapy-related myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukemia, Leukemia, 22, 240, 10.1038/sj.leu.2405078 · DOI
  42. Nakanishi, (1999), Chromosomal instability in acute myelocytic leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome patients among atomic bomb survivors, J. Radiat. Res, 40, 159, 10.1269/jrr.40.159 · DOI
  43. Mueller, (2002), Heterozygous PU.1 mutations are associated with acute myeloid leukemia, Blood, 100, 998, 10.1182/blood.V100.3.998 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Bonadies, (2010), Heterozygous deletion of the PU.1 locus in human AML, Blood, 115, 331, 10.1182/blood-2009-03-212225 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Durual, (2007), Lentiviral PU.1 overexpression restores differentiation in myeloid leukemic blasts, Leukemia, 21, 1050, 10.1038/sj.leu.2404645 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Corces-Zimmerman, (2014), Pre-leukemic evolution of hematopoietic stem cells: the importance of early mutations in leukemogenesis, Leukemia, 28, 2276, 10.1038/leu.2014.211 · DOI
  47. Walter, (2005), Reduced PU.1 expression causes myeloid progenitor expansion and increased leukemia penetrance in mice expressing PML-RARalpha, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 102, 12513, 10.1073/pnas.0504247102 · DOI · Paper page
  48. O’Connell, (2008), Sustained expression of microRNA-155 in hematopoietic stem cells causes a myeloproliferative disorder, J. Exp. Med, 205, 585, 10.1084/jem.20072108 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Curik, (2012), 5-azacitidine in aggressive myelodysplastic syndromes regulates chromatin structure at PU.1 gene and cell differentiation capacity, Leukemia, 26, 1804, 10.1038/leu.2012.47 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 46

Metadata

Authors
Verbiest, T., Bouffler, S., Nutt, S. L., & Badie, C.
Venue
Carcinogenesis
Published
2015-03-06
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
413-419
ISSN
  • 1460-2180
  • 0143-3334
Cited by
46
References
16
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review