Area 3a: Topographic Organization and Cortical Connections in Marmoset Monkeys
Abstract
The functional organization of area 3a, a cortical field proposed to be involved in somato-motor-vestibular integration, has never been described for any primate. In the present investigation, the topographic organization and connections of area 3a were examined in marmosets using electrophysiological recording and anatomical tracing techniques. Multi-unit neuronal activity was recorded at a number of closely spaced sites; receptive fields (RFs) for neurons were determined, and the optimal stimulus was identified. In all cases, neurons in area 3a responded to the stimulation of deep receptors on the contralateral body. The representation of the body in area 3a was from the toes and foot, to the hindlimb, trunk, forelimb, hand and face in a mediolateral progression. In all cases electrophysiological results were related to myeloarchitecture, and the map in area 3a was found to be coextensive with a strip of lightly to moderately myelinated cortex just rostral to the darkly myelinated 3b. To examine the cortical connections of area 3a, injections of anatomical tracers were made into electrophysiologically identified body part representations. Area 3a has dense intrinsic connections and receives substantial inputs from the primary motor cortex (M1), the supplementary motor area (SMA), areas 1 and 2, the second somatosensory area (S2), and areas in posterior parietal cortex (PP). The connections of area 3a indicate that integration of cortical representations of body parts occurs…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The primary motor and sensory cortex lie next to each other in the central sulcus and are strongly interconnected.
“For example, the primary motor and sensory cortex lie next to each other in the central sulcus and are strongly interconnected (Huffman and Krubitzer 2001).”
From Action and behavior: a free-energy formulation (2010) · cites this paper as Huffman and Krubitzer 2001
Empirically, the intimate relationship between motor and sensory systems is seen at cortical, subcortical, and spinal levels.
“Empirically, this is seen at cortical, subcortical, and spinal levels.”
From Action and behavior: a free-energy formulation (2010) · cites this paper as Huffman and Krubitzer 2001
Cites
Andersen, R. A., Snyder, L. H., Bradley, D. C., & Xing, J. (1997) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.303 · Cited by 1,486 · see citing works
Lane, R. D., Reiman, E. M., Axelrod, B., Yun, L.-S., Holmes, A., & Schwartz, G. E. (1998) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892998562924 · Cited by 671 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Action and behavior: a free-energy formulation
Friston, K. J., Daunizeau, J., Kilner, J., & Kiebel, S. J. (2010) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-010-0364-z · Cited by 866 · see citing works
“strongly interconnected (Huffman and Krubitzer 2001).”
The subjective experience of pain: where expectations become reality
Koyama, T., McHaffie, J. G., Laurienti, P. J., & Coghill, R. C. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0408576102 · Cited by 747 · see citing works
Friston, K. J., & Stephan, K. E. (2007) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-007-9237-y · Cited by 673 · see citing works
Medial frontal cortex: From self-generated action to reflection on one's own performance
Passingham, R. E., Bengtsson, S. L., & Lau, H. C. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.11.001 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Neural Basis of Touch and Proprioception in Primate Cortex
Delhaye, B. P., Long, K. H., & Bensmaia, S. J. (2018) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c170033 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Padberg, J., Disbrow, E., & Krubitzer, L. (2005) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi071 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Identification and integration of sensory modalities: Neural basis and relation to consciousness
Pennartz, C. M. A. (2009) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.03.003 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
- Authors
- Huffman, K. J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Huffman, K. J.
- ORCID
- Huffman, K. J.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-09-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 849-867
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2134953279
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ns035103-17, 1f31mh012284-01)
- National Institute of Mental Health (1 F31 MH12284-01)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1 RO1 NS35103-01A1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Keywords
- area 3a, somatosensory cortex, topographic map, representation of the body, marmoset, cortical connectivity, primary motor cortex, supplementary motor area, secondary somatosensory cortex, posterior parietal cortex, intrinsic connections, myeloarchitecture, eye-hand coordination, reaching, vestibular integration
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain Mapping, Callithrix, Cerebral Cortex, Face, Forelimb, Neural Pathways, Sensory Receptor Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review