Cited by 252Free Will and AgencyNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMotor Control and Adaptation

Medial frontal cortex: From self-generated action to reflection on one's own performance

Open access
Passingham, Richard E., Bengtsson, Sara L., Lau, Hakwan C.·2010·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

It was suggested over 20 years ago that the supplementary motor cortex is involved in self-generated behaviour. Since then, there have been many studies using electrophysiology and brain imaging of the role of the supplementary motor cortex and anterior cingulate cortex. In light of the findings, the proposal that these regions are crucial for self-generated action has recently been challenged. Here, we review the recent literature and argue that the proposal survives the findings. We further argue that it can be generalised to cover reflection on mental states. Finally, we suggest that the pattern of anatomical connections is consistent with the proposal that the medial frontal cortex is crucially involved in self-generated action and self-reflection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2009.11.001

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]Halsband U. Higher disturbances of movement in monkeys (Macaca mulatta) Gantchev G.N. Motor Control 1987 Plenum Press 79 85

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Passingham, R. E., Bengtsson, S. L., & Lau, H. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Corresponding author
Passingham, Richard E.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
16-21
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010622789
Cited by
252
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 16
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
medial frontal cortex, supplementary motor area, anterior cingulate cortex, self-generated action, self-reflection, structural connectivity, motor control
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Conditioning, Classical, Cues, Fear, Frontal Lobe, Hippocampus, Humans, Memory, Models, Psychological, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Self Concept, Nonlinear Dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review