The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neocortical Neuronal Diversity: Chemical Heterogeneity Revealed by Colocalization Studies of Classic Neurotransmitters, Neuropeptides, Calcium-binding Proteins, and Cell Surface Molecules
Abstract
The use of immunocytochemical and histochemical methods to study colocalization of two or more chemical compounds in the same neuron has revealed that there is a great diversity of neocortical neurons. Neurons double stained for two or more substances are found in all layers, except in layer I, in all cortical areas and species studied so far, but there seem to be differences in the proportions and numbers of neurons double stained for a particular combination of substances between different species, and between cortical layers and cortical areas of the same species. With few (though important) exceptions, the majority of classic neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, calcium-binding proteins, and cell surface molecules currently known to be present in the neocortex are localized mainly, if not exclusively, in smooth nonpyramidal cells. Therefore, chemical diversity of neurons in the neocortex is mainly a feature of the population of nonpyramidal cells. It seems clear that no combinations of double staining are found exclusively in a single morphological type of nonpyramidal neuron. However, in some species, certain combinations are found selectively in particular groups of smooth nonpyramidial neurons. Conversely, the same morphological type of neuron can display a variety of chemical characteristics depending on the species and cortical area and layer in which it is located. These studies have so far proved useful to characterize and identify cortical neuronal subpopulations and cortical circuits anatomically, but they probably have functional significance as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interneurons of the hippocampus
Freund, T. F., & Buzsáki, G. (1998) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-1063(1996)6:4<347::aid-hipo1>3.0.co;2-i · Cited by 3,441
Interneurons of the neocortical inhibitory system
Markram, H., Toledo-Rodriguez, M., Wang, Y., Gupta, A., Silberberg, G., & Wu, C. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1519 · Cited by 2,954
NEURONAL CIRCUITS OF THE NEOCORTEX
Douglas, R. J., & Martin, K. A. C. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144152 · Cited by 1,886
Reconstruction and Simulation of Neocortical Microcircuitry
Markram, H., Muller, E., Ramaswamy, S., Reimann, M. W., Abdellah, M., Sanchez, C. A., Ailamaki, A., Alonso-Nanclares, L., Antille, N., Arsever, S., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.029 · Cited by 1,557
Self-citationThree groups of interneurons account for nearly 100% of neocortical GABAergic neurons
Rudy, B., Fishell, G., Lee, S., & Hjerling‐Leffler, J. (2011) · Developmental Neurobiology · doi:10.1002/dneu.20853 · Cited by 1,420
Metadata
- Authors
- DeFelipe, J.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 273-289
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W1998341727
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neocortical Neuronal Diversity: Chemical Heterogeneity Revealed by Colocalization Studies of Classic Neurotransmitters, Neuropeptides, Calcium-binding Proteins, and Cell Surface Molecules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cercor/3.4.273
- The paper
- DeFelipe, J. (1993). Neocortical Neuronal Diversity: Chemical Heterogeneity Revealed by Colocalization Studies of Classic Neurotransmitters, Neuropeptides, Calcium-binding Proteins, and Cell Surface Molecules. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/3.4.273
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.