The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional Topography: Multidimensional Scaling and Functional Connectivity in the Brain
Abstract
In neuroimaging, functional mapping usually implies mapping function into an anatomical space, for example, using statistical parametric mapping to identify activation foci, or the characterization of distributed changes with spatial modes (eigenimages or principal components) (Friston et al., 1993a). This article is about a complementary approach, namely, mapping anatomy into a functional space. We describe a simple variant of multidimensional scaling (principal coordinates analysis; Gower, 1966) that uses functional connectivity as its metric. The scaling transformation maps anatomy into a functional space. The topography, or proximity relationships, in this space embody the functional connectivity among brain regions. The higher the functional connectivity, the closer the regions. Functional connectivity is defined here as the correlation between remote neurophysiological events. The technique represents a descriptive characterization of anatomically distributed changes in the brain that reveals the structure of corticocortical interactions in terms of functional correlations. To illustrate the approach we have analyzed data from normal subjects and schizophrenic patients obtained with PET during the performance of word generation tasks. In particular, we focus on prefrontotemporal integration in normal subjects and show that, in schizophrenia, the left temporal regions and prefrontal cortex evidence abnormal functional connectivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Circuitry of Primate Prefrontal Cortex and Regulation of Behavior by Representational Memory
Goldman‐Rakic, P. S. (1987) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010509 · Cited by 1,960
Frith, C. D. (1987) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700025873 · Cited by 655
Self-citation
Cited by
Functional connectivity in single and multislice echoplanar imaging using resting-state fluctuations
Lowe, M. J., Mock, B. J., & Sorenson, J. A. (1998) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1997.0315 · Cited by 1,394
A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks
Dehaene, S., Kerszberg, M., & Changeux, J.-P. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.24.14529 · Cited by 1,347
Dysconnection in schizophrenia: from abnormal synaptic plasticity to failures of self-monitoring
Stephan, K. E., Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D. (2009) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbn176 · Cited by 1,134
Self-citationBush, G., Frazier, J. A., Rauch, S. L., Seidman, L. J., Whalen, P. J., Jenike, M. A., Rosen, B. R., & Biederman, J. (1999) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00083-9 · Cited by 866
Synaptic plasticity and dysconnection in schizophrenia
Stephan, K. E., Baldeweg, T., & Friston, K. J. (2006) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.10.005 · Cited by 841
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Friston, K. J., Frith, C. D., Fletcher, P., Liddle, P. F., & Frackowiak, R. S. J.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 156-164
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2002692727
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional Topography: Multidimensional Scaling and Functional Connectivity in the Brain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cercor/6.2.156
- The paper
- Friston, K. J., Frith, C. D., Fletcher, P., Liddle, P. F., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1996). Functional Topography: Multidimensional Scaling and Functional Connectivity in the Brain. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/6.2.156
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.