The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nouns and Verbs in the Intact Brain: Evidence from Event-related Potentials and High-frequency Cortical Responses
Abstract
Lesion evidence indicates that words from different lexical categories, such as nouns and verbs, may have different cortical counterparts. In this study, processing of nouns and verbs was investigated in the intact brain using (i) behavioral measures, (ii) stimulus-triggered event-related potentials and (iii) high-frequency electrocortical responses in the gamma band. Nouns and verbs carefully matched for various variables, including word frequency, length, arousal and valence, were presented in a lexical decision task while electrocortical responses were recorded. In addition, information about cognitive processing of these stimuli was obtained using questionnaires and reaction times. As soon as approximately 200 ms after stimulus onset, event-related potentials disclosed electrocortical differences between nouns and verbs over widespread cortical areas. In a later time window, 500-800 ms after stimulus onset, there was a significant difference between high-frequency responses in the 30 Hz range. Difference maps obtained from both event-related potentials and high-frequency responses revealed strong between-category differences of signals recorded above motor and visual cortices. Behavioral data suggest that these different physiological responses are related to semantic associations (motor or visual) elicited by these word groups. Our results are consistent with a neurobiological model of language representation postulating cell assemblies with distinct cortical topographies as biological counterparts of words. Assemblies representing nouns referring to visually perceived objects may include neurons in visual cortices, and assemblies representing action verbs may include additional neurons in motor, premotor and prefrontal cortices. Event-related potentials and high-frequency responses are proposed to indicate two different functional states of cell assemblies: initial full activation ('ignition') and continuous reverberatory activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Hebb, D. O. (2005) · doi:10.4324/9781410612403 · Cited by 9,825
A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9 · Cited by 5,055 · cited 1×
“Small artifacts caused by blinks or vertical or horizontal eye movements were removed using the method proposed by Gratton et al. (Gratton et al., 1983).”
MethodReport of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography
(1958) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(58)90053-1 · Cited by 2,717
Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping
Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., & Echallier, J. F. (1989) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(89)90180-6 · Cited by 2,706
Pulvermüller, F. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x9900182x · Cited by 1,284
Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe
Nobre, A. C., Allison, T., & McCarthy, G. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/372260a0 · Cited by 789
Entwurf einer neurologischen Theorie der Sprache
Braitenberg, V., & Pulverm�ller, F. (1992) · Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf01131538 · Cited by 155
Cited by
Brain mechanisms linking language and action
Pulvermüller, F. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1706 · Cited by 1,828
Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Druks, J., Barber, H., & Cappa, S. F. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.007 · Cited by 594
Grasping Ideas with the Motor System: Semantic Somatotopy in Idiom Comprehension
Boulenger, V., Hauk, O., & Pulvermuller, F. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn217 · Cited by 573
Self-citationReading cinnamon activates olfactory brain regions
González, J., Barros-Loscertales, A., Pulvermüller, F., Meseguer, V., Sanjuán, A., Belloch, V., & Ávila, C. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.037 · Cited by 555
Induced electrocorticographic gamma activity during auditory perception
Crone, N. E., Boatman, D., Gordon, B., & Hao, L. (2001) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00545-9 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Pulvermuller, F.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-07-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 497-506
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2128368093
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nouns and Verbs in the Intact Brain: Evidence from Event-related Potentials and High-frequency Cortical Responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cercor/9.5.497
- The paper
- Pulvermuller, F. (1999). Nouns and Verbs in the Intact Brain: Evidence from Event-related Potentials and High-frequency Cortical Responses. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/9.5.497
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.