Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 241

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Temporary Occlusion of Associative Motor Cortical Plasticity by Prior Dynamic Motor Training

Stefan, Katja, Wycislo, Matthias, Gentner, Reinhard, Schramm, Axel, Naumann, Markus, Reiners, Karlheinz, Classen, Joseph·2006·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

A novel Hebbian stimulation paradigm was employed to examine physiological correlates of motor memory formation in humans. Repetitive pairing of median nerve stimulation with transcranial magnetic stimulation over the contralateral motor cortex (paired associative stimulation, PAS) may decrease human motor cortical excitability at interstimulus intervals of 10 ms (PAS10) or increase excitability at 25 ms (PAS25). The properties of this plasticity have previously been shown to resemble associative timing-dependent long-term depression (LTD) and long-term potentiation (LTP) as established in vitro. Immediately after training a novel dynamic motor task, the capacity of the motor cortex to undergo plasticity in response to PAS25 was abolished. PAS10-induced plasticity remained unchanged. When retested after 6 h, PAS25-induced plasticity recovered to baseline levels. After training, normal PAS25-induced plasticity was observed in the contralateral training-naive motor cortex. Motor training did not reduce the efficacy of PAS25 to enhance cortical excitability when PAS10 was interspersed between the training and application of the PAS25 protocol. This indicated that the mechanism supporting PAS25-induced plasticity had remained intact immediately after training. Behavioral evidence was obtained for continued optimization of force generation at a time when PAS25-induced plasticity was blocked in the training motor cortex. Application of the PAS protocols after motor training did not prevent the consolidation of motor skills evident as performance gains at later retesting. The results are consistent with a concept of temporary suppression of associative cortical plasticity by neuronal mechanisms involved in motor training. Although it remains an open question exactly which element of motor training was responsible for this effect, our findings may link dynamic properties of LTP formation, as established in animal experiments, with human motor memory formation and possibly dynamic motor learning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhi116

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 241

Metadata

Authors
Stefan, K., Wycislo, M., Gentner, R., Schramm, A., Naumann, M., Reiners, K., & Classen, J.
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2005-06-01
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
376-385
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2101963369
Cited by
241
References
4
FWCI
8.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporary Occlusion of Associative Motor Cortical Plasticity by Prior Dynamic Motor Training. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cercor/bhi116
The paper
Stefan, K., Wycislo, M., Gentner, R., Schramm, A., Naumann, M., Reiners, K., & Classen, J. (2006). Temporary Occlusion of Associative Motor Cortical Plasticity by Prior Dynamic Motor Training. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhi116

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.