The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Early Development of Functional Network Segregation Revealed by Connectomic Analysis of the Preterm Human Brain
Open accessAbstract
Human brain functional networks are topologically organized with nontrivial connectivity characteristics such as small-worldness and densely linked hubs to support highly segregated and integrated information processing. However, how they emerge and change at very early developmental phases remains poorly understood. Here, we used resting-state functional MRI and voxel-based graph theory analysis to systematically investigate the topological organization of whole-brain networks in 40 infants aged around 31 to 42 postmenstrual weeks. The functional connectivity strength and heterogeneity increased significantly in primary motor, somatosensory, visual, and auditory regions, but much less in high-order default-mode and executive-control regions. The hub and rich-club structures in primary regions were already present at around 31 postmenstrual weeks and exhibited remarkable expansions with age, accompanied by increased local clustering and shortest path length, indicating a transition from a relatively random to a more organized configuration. Moreover, multivariate pattern analysis using support vector regression revealed that individual brain maturity of preterm babies could be predicted by the network connectivity patterns. Collectively, we highlighted a gradually enhanced functional network segregation manner in the third trimester, which is primarily driven by the rapid increases of functional connectivity of the primary regions, providing crucial insights into the topological development patterns prior to birth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modularity and community structure in networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601602103 · Cited by 12,256
Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems
Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2575 · Cited by 11,820
Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri
Biswal, B., Zerrin Yetkin, F., Haughton, V. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1995) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910340409 · Cited by 9,812
BrainNet Viewer: A Network Visualization Tool for Human Brain Connectomics
Xia, M., Wang, J., & He, Y. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068910 · Cited by 4,106
DPARSF: a MATLAB toolbox for “pipeline” data analysis of resting-state fMRI
Yan (2010) · Frontiers in System Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2010.00013 · Cited by 3,475
The economy of brain network organization
Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3214 · Cited by 3,284
The Human Connectome: A Structural Description of the Human Brain
Sporns, O., Tononi, G., & Kötter, R. (2005) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010042 · Cited by 3,260
Buckner, R. L., Sepulcre, J., Talukdar, T., Krienen, F. M., Liu, H., Hedden, T., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Sperling, R. A., & Johnson, K. A. (2009) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5062-08.2009 · Cited by 2,862
Efficiency and Cost of Economical Brain Functional Networks
Achard, S., & Bullmore, E. (2007) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030017 · Cited by 2,553
Murphy, K., Birn, R. M., Handwerker, D. A., Jones, T. B., & Bandettini, P. A. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.036 · Cited by 2,387
Cited by
Injured Brains and Adaptive Networks: The Benefits and Costs of Hyperconnectivity
Hillary, F. G., & Grafman, J. H. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.03.003 · Cited by 366
Developmental connectomics from infancy through early childhood
Cao, M., Huang, H., & He, Y. (2017) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2017.06.003 · Cited by 284
Self-citationTransient cortical circuits match spontaneous and sensory-driven activity during development
Molnár, Z., Luhmann, H. J., & Kanold, P. O. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb2153 · Cited by 280
Delineation of early brain development from fetuses to infants with diffusion MRI and beyond
Ouyang, M., Dubois, J., Yu, Q., Mukherjee, P., & Huang, H. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.017 · Cited by 258
Self-citationExploring early human brain development with structural and physiological neuroimaging
Vasung, L., Abaci Turk, E., Ferradal, S. L., Sutin, J., Stout, J. N., Ahtam, B., Lin, P.-Y., & Grant, P. E. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.041 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Cao, M., He, Y., Dai, Z., Liao, X., Jeon, T., Ouyang, M., Chalak, L., Bi, Y., Rollins, N., Dong, Q., & Huang, H.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-03-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- bhw038
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2292856201
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 10.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early Development of Functional Network Segregation Revealed by Connectomic Analysis of the Preterm Human Brain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cercor/bhw038
- The paper
- Cao, M., He, Y., Dai, Z., Liao, X., Jeon, T., Ouyang, M., Chalak, L., Bi, Y., Rollins, N., Dong, Q., & Huang, H. (2016). Early Development of Functional Network Segregation Revealed by Connectomic Analysis of the Preterm Human Brain. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.