The DOI matches its Crossref record; 125 of the 125 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sex Differences in the Adult Human Brain: Evidence from 5216 UK Biobank Participants
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Sex differences in the human brain are of interest for many reasons: for example, there are sex differences in the observed prevalence of psychiatric disorders and in some psychological traits that brain differences might help to explain. We report the largest single-sample study of structural and functional sex differences in the human brain (2750 female, 2466 male participants; mean age 61.7 years, range 44-77 years). Males had higher raw volumes, raw surface areas, and white matter fractional anisotropy; females had higher raw cortical thickness and higher white matter tract complexity. There was considerable distributional overlap between the sexes. Subregional differences were not fully attributable to differences in total volume, total surface area, mean cortical thickness, or height. There was generally greater male variance across the raw structural measures. Functional connectome organization showed stronger connectivity for males in unimodal sensorimotor cortices, and stronger connectivity for females in the default mode network. This large-scale study provides a foundation for attempts to understand the causes and consequences of sex differences in adult brain structure and function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Sex-related differences in brain structure and function have been consistently reported across large-scale neuroimaging studies, involving both global and regional measures such as total brain volume, cortical thickness, white matter microstructure, and functional connectivity [29,30,31,32].”
From Benchmarking Multimodal Deep Fusion Strategies for Heterogeneous Neuroimaging and Cognitive Data Using a Controlled Sex Classification Task (2026) · cites this paper as [31]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“As sex differences exist in brain morphology,33”
From Sex Differences in the Association of Global Amyloid and Regional Tau Deposition Measured by Positron Emission Tomography in Clinically Normal Older Adults (2019) · cites this paper as [33]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Memory impairment is similarly found among patients with Cushing disease and Cushing syndrome (694).”
From Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia—Current Insights in Pathophysiology, Diagnostics, and Management (2022) · cites this paper as [694]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Desikan, R. S., Ségonne, F., Fischl, B., Quinn, B. T., Dickerson, B. C., Blacker, D., Buckner, R. L., Dale, A. M., Maguire, R. P., Hyman, B. T., et al. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 · Cited by 13,324 · cited 1×
“2007), according to the Desikan– Killiany atlas (Desikan et al. 2006).”
MethodJenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M., & Smith, S. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1132 · Cited by 11,888 · cited 1×
“The following preprocessing procedures were applied: motion correction using MCFLIRT (Jenkinson et al. 2002), grand-mean intensity normalization using a single multiplicative factor, high-pass temporal filtering with a Gaussian-weighted least-squares straight line fitting (sigma was set as 50.”
MethodThe descent of man and selection in relation to sex
チャールス, ダ., & 茂穂, 田. (1907) · Tokyo Jinrui Gakkai zasshi · doi:10.1537/ase1887.22.495 · Cited by 10,909
Fast robust automated brain extraction
Smith, S. M. (2002) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.10062 · Cited by 10,496
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3475 · Cited by 7,641 · cited 2×
“Given the surfeit of small-n studies in neuroscience (Button et al. 2013; Nord et al. 2017), it is of great importance to test hypotheses in large, well-powered samples, especially given that many neural sex differences are modest in size (Joel et al.”
BackgroundZhang, Y., Brady, M., & Smith, S. M. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.906424 · Cited by 7,628 · cited 1×
“2001, 2007a, 2007b) and FAST (Zhang et al. 2001), yielding cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), grey and white matter volumes.”
BackgroundHow do you feel — now? The anterior insula and human awareness
(Bud) Craig, A. D. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2555 · Cited by 6,657
Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images
Fischl, B. R., & Dale, A. M. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.200033797 · Cited by 5,995
A New Initiative on Precision Medicine
Collins, F. S., & Varmus, H. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1500523 · Cited by 5,202
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Fine, 2017, Testosterone Rex: unmaking the myths of our gendered minds
- Maeda, 2013, Ed Psychol Rev, 69
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 854
Sex differences in the human brain related to visual motion perception
Liu, D., Li, M., Yu, J., Gao, Y., Zhang, X., Hu, D., Northoff, G., Song, X. M., & Zhu, J. (2024) · Biology of Sex Differences · doi:10.1186/s13293-024-00668-2 · Cited by 5
Metoki, A., Chauvin, R. J., Gordon, E. M., Laumann, T. O., Kay, B. P., Adeyemo, B., Krimmel, S. R., Marek, S. A., Wang, A., Van, A. N., et al. (2025) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101624 · Cited by 4
“While some studies have pinpointed specific networks where rsFC appears to vary between males and females (Biswal et al., 2010; Ritchie et al., 2018; L. Tian et al., 2011; Zuo et al., 2010), others have reported no discernible impact of sex in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging…”
Subjective Cognitive Decline and Biomarkers of Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease
Shokouhi, S., & Albert, K. M. (2019) · Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports · doi:10.1007/s40473-019-00191-4 · Cited by 4
At the Crossroads of Women’s Experience
Pang, J. S., & Baumann, N. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108561716.015 · Cited by 4
Latzman, R. D., & Kumari, V. (2020) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.2020.34.5.577 · Cited by 4
“Furthermore, given known sex differences in human brain structures and function (Lotze et al., 2019; Ritchie et al., 2018) and possibly in certain PD traits or their expression (Sansone & Sansone, 2011), consideration of participants’ sex will also be important for studies aiming to clarify the neurobiology of persona…”
BackgroundHsu, C. H., Huang, C., Tsai, S., Chen, L., Li, H., Lo, C. Z., & Lin, C. (2021) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2020.0961 · Cited by 4
“In terms of sex effect, males showed higher WM directivity, while females showed higher WM complexity (Hemmen et al., 2017; Menzler et al., 2011; Ritchie et al., 2018); however, the role of sex effect on the age trajectories of WM tracts and whether it may cause differences in cognitive abilities…”
Impaired social perception from eyes and face visual cues: evidence from prefrontal cortex damage
Ouerchefani, R., Ouerchefani, N., Rejeb, M. R. B., & Gall, D. L. (2021) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2021.1983458 · Cited by 5
“However, by considering (1) the studies showing gender differences in brain structure, function and left-right asymmetry in the prefrontal cortex (Ritchie et al., 2018: Ruigrok et al., 2014; Tranel et al., 2005); and (2) research on emotion perception in healthy normal populations acknowledging an…”
BackgroundBiobanks and Artificial Intelligence
Abdulkareem, M., Aung, N., & Petersen, S. E. (2022) · Contemporary medical imaging · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-92087-6_8 · Cited by 4
Resting-state network analysis of suicide attempt history in the UK Biobank
Thompson, M. F., Ghahramanlou‐Holloway, M., Murphy, M. A., Perera, K. U., Benca‐Bachman, C. E., Palmer, R. H. C., & Gray, J. C. (2023) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291723001356 · Cited by 4
“Group-ICA parcellated preprocessed EPI images were fed into the MELODIC tool of FSL to generate a 21 × 21 matrix of ICA components, used for analyses (https://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/ ukbiobank/protocol/V4_23092014.pdf) (Ritchie et al., 2018; Shen et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSex/Gender Differences in the Brain and their Relationship to Behavior
Eliot, L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108561716.007 · Cited by 4
Fertility, Childbirth, and Parenting
Macleod, C. I., & Morison, T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108561716.011 · Cited by 5
Thulborn, K. R. (2022) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.4693 · Cited by 4
Antal, S. I., Kincses, B., Veréb, D., Király, A., Tóth, E. M., Bozsik, B., Faragó, P., Szabó, N., Kocsis, K., Bencsik, K., et al. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-31706-5 · Cited by 5
“To investigate the relationship between cortical and subcortical volumetric measures and average OND, we calculated partial Pearson’s correlation, correcting for age and sex, which reportedly influence cortical and subcortical structure volumes 58,59 .”
MethodBrain development and maturation in the context of learning
Cachia, A., Ribeiro, S. T. G., Chiao, J. Y., Friston, K. J., Hillman, C. H., Linzarini, A., Lipina, S. J., Howard‐Jones, P. A., Dubois, J., Jay, T. M., et al. (2022) · UNESCO MGIEP eBooks · doi:10.56383/zevv4282 · Cited by 4
Are Bigger Brains Smarter? Evidence from a Large-Scale Pre-Registered StudyPreprint
Nave, G., Jung, W. H., Linnér, R. K., Kable, J., & Koellinger, P. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3295349 · Cited by 5
Accurate sex prediction of cisgender and transgender individuals without brain size biasPreprint
Wiersch, L., Hamdan, S., Hoffstaedter, F., Votinov, M., Habel, U., Clemens, B., Derntl, B., Eickhoff, S. B., Patil, K. R., & Weis, S. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.26.499576 · Cited by 4
The pivotal role of the X-chromosome in the genetic architecture of the human brainPreprint
Jiang, Z., Sullivan, P. F., Li, T., Zhao, B., Wang, X., Luo, T., Huang, S., Guan, P. Y., Chen, J., Yang, Y., et al. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.08.30.23294848 · Cited by 4
Gu, Y., Stauffer, E.-M., Bedford, S. A., Romero-García, R., Grove, J., Børglum, A. D., Martin, H. C., Baron‐Cohen, S., Bethlehem, R. A. I., & Warrier, V. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.04.10.24305539 · Cited by 4
Inter-individual, hemispheric and sex variability of brain activations during numerosity processing
Zang, Z., Chi, X., Luan, M., Hu, S., Zhou, K., & Jia Liu, B. (2024) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-023-02747-3 · Cited by 3
“Second, anatomical differences in brain structure could contribute to these findings (e.g., Liu et al. 2020; Ritchie et al 2018).”
BackgroundSex Matters: Association with Superager Classification and Risk Factors
McPhee, M. D., McKetton, L., LaPlume, A. A., Troyer, A. K., & Anderson, N. D. (2024) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/acae064 · Cited by 3
Yao, J., Feng, G., Shao, G., Wang, Z., Mendizabal, A., Telesca, D., Fang, K., Ibragimova, L., Shoaib, J., Morrison, M. A., et al. (2025) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.70064 · Cited by 3
“33-36 Despite smaller initial volumes, females showed less pronounced atrophy in these regions with increasing CAPS.”
Brain maps of general cognitive functioning: neuroimaging and neurobiological signatures
Moodie, J. E., Buchanan, C. R., Fürtjes, A. E., Conole, E. L. S., Stolicyn, A., Corley, J., Ferguson, K. J., Hernández, M. V., Maniega, S. M., Russ, T. C., et al. (2025) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-025-03617-8 · Cited by 5
“Regions of the cortex where larger volume or surface area is more strongly associated with better general cognitive functioning were also those regions that show, for example, lower metabolic activity at rest ( r = − 0.41 and − 0.29, respectively), lower cortical myelination (T1/T2 contrast, r = −…”
InfluentialSelf-citationLi, L., Cui, Z., & Wang, L. (2022) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-022-00900-5 · Cited by 3
“Some investigators suggest that although there are many differences, human brains cannot be categorized as female brains and male brains (Joel et al. 2015; Ritchie et al. 2018).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA surface-based deep-learning approach for cortical shape analysis
Im, Y., Zhao, Y., Gutman, B. A., Thomopoulos, S. I., Haddad, E., Zhu, A. H., Jahanshad, N., Thompson, P. M., & Ching, C. R. K. (2025) · SPIE Medical Imaging: Computer-Aided Diagnosis · doi:10.1117/12.3045252 · Cited by 3
Ma, R., Hao, J., Ding, J., Yu, H., & Xia, S. (2025) · Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.21037/qims-2024-2571 · Cited by 3
Saha, R., Saha, D. K., Fu, Z., Duda, M., Silva, R. F., Wilson, T. W., Wang, Y., Stephen, J. M., & Calhoun, V. D. (2025) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.70241 · Cited by 3
“These observations suggest gender-dependent variations in the interplay between structural changes and functional connectivity, emphasizing the importance of considering individual differences in understanding brain dynamics (Ingalhalikar et al. 2014; Ritchie et al. 2018).”
Leung, S. A., & Cinamon, R. G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108561716.024 · Cited by 4
Understanding Gender Inequality in Poverty and Social Exclusion through a Psychological Lens
Zhang, M. F., & Gordon, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108561716.033 · Cited by 3
Influence of gonadal steroids on cortical surface area in infancy
Alex, A. M., Ruvio, T., Xia, K., Jha, S. C., Girault, J. B., Wang, L., Li, G., Shen, D. G., Cornea, E. A., Styner, M. A., et al. (2021) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhab410 · Cited by 3
Age-Related Trajectories of Brain Structure–Function Coupling in Female Roller Derby Athletes
Monroe, D. C., DuBois, S. L., Rhea, C. K., & Duffy, D. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci12010022 · Cited by 4
“Moreover, despite evidence of sex differences in brain aging [36,37], few neuroimaging studies are designed to exclusively study the brains of female contact or collision sport athletes [38].”
BackgroundVolumetric asymmetry of the major association white fibers in healthy young adults
Bakhit, M. S., Hiruta, R., Iwami, K., & Fujii, M. (2022) · Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology · doi:10.1007/s11055-022-01241-3 · Cited by 3
Summers, V. (2022) · Biology of Sex Differences · doi:10.1186/s13293-022-00457-9 · Cited by 3
“Overall there does not appear to be any consistent association between sex-related differences in variability and in mean scores [19, 20].”
BackgroundMultimodal imaging of the aging brain: Baseline findings of the LoCARPoN study
Nair, P., Prasad, K., Balasundaram, P., Vibha, D., Dwivedi, S. N., Gaikwad, S. B., Srivastava, A. K., & Verma, V. (2023) · Aging Brain · doi:10.1016/j.nbas.2023.100075 · Cited by 3
“6 [11], Framingham Study [10], Rotterdam Study [9], Singapore Longitudinal Aging Brain [32], Strong Heart Study [33], UK Biobank Study [34], and Washington Heights/ Hamilton Heights Aging Project (WHICAP) [35].”
BackgroundResultCao, W., Liu, Y., Zhong, M., Liao, H., Cai, S., Chu, J., Zheng, S., Tan, C., & Yi, J. (2023) · Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation · doi:10.1186/s40479-023-00227-y · Cited by 3
Lan, X., Zhu, X., Bai, W., Liu, H., Wang, H., Dun, W., Guo, C., Zhang, M., & Niu, X. (2023) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.16154 · Cited by 3
“Compared to healthy females, healthy males generally presented higher FA values, particularly in the corticospinal tract (Ritchie et al., 2018).”
BackgroundSex Differences in Reading and Math Test Scores of Children
Thomas, H. (2023) · Monographs in the psychology of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-41272-1 · Cited by 3
Sex and Gender in Population Neuroscience
Vosberg, D. E. (2024) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2024_468 · Cited by 3
Moraes, C. A. D. C., Varotto, E., Artico, M., Galassi, F. M., Forte, F., & Habicht, M. E. (2024) · Morphologie · doi:10.1016/j.morpho.2024.100781 · Cited by 3
Judd, N., & Kievit, R. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.1101/2024.05.17.594682 · Cited by 2
Maldonado‐Devincci, A. M., Odelade, A. E., Irby-Shabazz, A., Jadhav, V. V., Nepal, P., Chang, E. M., Chang, A. Y., & Han, J. (2024) · Nutritional Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/1028415x.2024.2377471 · Cited by 3
“Sex differences significantly influence dopamine-associated behaviors with females showing higher susceptibility to anxiety and depression due to variations in dopamine receptor complexes and turnover rates [16,17].”
Causal invariance guides interpretable graph contrastive learning in fMRI analysis
Wei, B., Zeng, W., Shi, Y., & Zhang, H. (2025) · Alexandria Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2025.01.043 · Cited by 3
Gender differences of the brain structures in young high-altitude Tibetans
Zhang, X., Fan, C., Liu, Y., Zhao, C., Zhao, Y., Yin, W., Lin, J., & Zhang, J. (2025) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaf012 · Cited by 3
Evolutionary Roots of Women’s Aggression
Davis, A. C., Vaillancourt, T., & Archer, J. E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108561716.022 · Cited by 4
Begdache, L., Chen, M., McKenna, C. E., & Witt, D. F. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100157 · Cited by 3
Bruña, R., Maestú, F., López‐Sanz, D., Bagic, A. I., Cohen, A. D., Chang, Y., Cheng, Y., Doman, J. M., Huppert, T., Kim, T., et al. (2021) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2021.0059 · Cited by 3
“…1994), some studies have found different network expressions using functional MRI (fMRI), especially in task-free paradigms (Liu et al., 2009; Ritchie et al., 2018; Sat-terthwaite et al., 2015; Scheinost et al., 2015; Tian et al., 2011) and less often during cognitive tasks (Aleman and…”
InfluentialBegdache, L. (2018) · Anthropology and Ethnology Open Access Journal · doi:10.23880/aeoaj-16000105 · Cited by 2
Dávid, S., Mesri, H. Y., Viergever, M. A., & Leemans, A. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/755140 · Cited by 3
“In a similar context, shifting the focus from p-values to effect sizes was also recently presented by Ritchie et al. (Ritchie et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMale sex hormones increase excitatory neuron production in developing human neocortexPreprint
Kelava, I., Chiaradia, I., Pellegrini, L., Kalinka, A. T., & Lancaster, M. A. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.10.24.353359 · Cited by 3
Shillcock, R. C., Bolenz, F., Basak, S., Morgan, A., & Fincham, O. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gpfm3 · Cited by 3
Gaudreault, P., King, S. G., Malaker, P., Nelly Alia-klein, A., & Goldstein, R. Z. (2022) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.03.22.22272765 · Cited by 3
ComBatLS: A location- and scale-preserving method for multi-site image harmonizationPreprint
Gardner, M., Shinohara, R. T., Bethlehem, R. A. I., Romero-García, R., Warrier, V., Dorfschmidt, L., Shanmugan, S., Thompson, P. M., Seidlitz, J., Alexander‐Bloch, A. F., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.06.21.599875 · Cited by 3
Judd, N., & Kievit, R. (2024) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.101526 · Cited by 4
“For instance, there are large sex differences in certain neural measures mostly related to head size ( Ritchie et al., 2018 ); therefore, we included a dummy variable for sex.”
Moodie, J. E., Buchanan, C. R., Fürtjes, A. E., Conole, E. L. S., Stolicyn, A., Corley, J., Ferguson, K. J., Hernández, M. D. C. V., Maniega, S. M., Russ, T. C., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.12.17.628670 · Cited by 3
Self-citationSanchis‐Segura, C., Wilcox, R. R., Cruz-Gómez, Á. J., Esbrí, S. F., Tirado, A. S., & Forn, C. (2023) · Biology of Sex Differences · doi:10.1186/s13293-023-00575-y · Cited by 2
“…studies that have consistently reported “large” univariate sex differences indicating larger raw GM vol in males across nearly all brain regions but less abundant and “small” sex differences with site-specific direction when comparing TIV-adjusted GM vol estimates (e.g., [30, 31, 33, 62, 63]).”
BackgroundManiaci, G., Collura, G., Cascia, C. L., Piccoli, T., Bongiorno, E., Barresi, I., Marrale, M., Gagliardo, C., Giammanco, A., Blandino, V., et al. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13195856 · Cited by 2
Abé, C. (2024) · Sexuality & Culture · doi:10.1007/s12119-024-10290-4 · Cited by 3
“…in the human brain have frequently been reported and are supported by a large body of evidence (Abé et al., 2021b; DeCasien et al., 2022; Forde et al., 2020; Lotze et al., 2019; Ritchie et al., 2018; Ruigrok et al., 2014; Sowell et al., 2007; Wiere-nga et al., 2022; Williams et al., 2021).”
NBS-Predict: An Easy-to-Use Toolbox for Connectome-Based Machine Learning
Serin, E., Vaidya, N., Walter, H., & Kruschwitz, J. (2024) · Neuromethods · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-4260-3_13 · Cited by 2
Drewelies, J., Fiedler, A., Brick, T. R., & Kühn, S. (2024) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2024.120728 · Cited by 2
Schilliger, Z., Pavan, T., Alemán‐Gómez, Y., Steullet, P., Céléreau, E., Binz, P., Celen, Z., Piguet, C., Merglen, A., Hagmann, P., et al. (2025) · Brain Behavior and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2025.01.026 · Cited by 3
Patel, R. K., Dalsaniya, P. N., Patel, P., & Patel, M. K. P. M. K. (2025) · Indian Journal of Private Psychiatry · doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10067-0186 · Cited by 2
Spatial navigation skills in older adults with and without cognitive impairment
Kossowska‐Kuhn, D., Prevratil, M. J., Charness, N. H., Boot, W. R., Czaja, S. J., & Rogers, W. A. (2025) · Frontiers in Aging · doi:10.3389/fragi.2025.1587003 · Cited by 2
Enduring prenatal androgen effects on the female brain
Kurth, F., Christian Gaser, B., Spencer, D., Thankamony, A., Hughes, I. A., Simpson, H., Srirangalingam, U., Gleeson, H. K., Hines, M., & Eileen Luders, A. (2025) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf396 · Cited by 3
“3,8 However, definite conclusions are difficult because existing CAH research was based on small sample sizes 3 and potentially under-powered studies (i.e. any significant effects might be small in size as also shown for a number of sex differences independent of CAH 9,10 ).”
Exploring mesoscale brain connectivity variations and developing sex-specific tractography templates
Jafari, B., & Hajiaghamemar, M. (2025) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121545 · Cited by 2
Intracranial volume: To adjust or not to adjust? It is not a matter of if, but how
Brzezinski-Rittner, A., Moqadam, R., Zeighami, Y., & Dadar, M. (2026) · Imaging Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/imag.a.1235 · Cited by 5
“…the adjustment measure for the vertexwise cortical volume analyses, total surface area (TSA) for the vertexwise SA, and mean cortical thickness (MCT) for the vertexwise CT, as employed in some studies using surface-based measurements ( Ritchie et al., 2018; Westman et al., 2013; Zhou et al., 2014).”
Ho, N. C. W., Zhukovsky, P., Rajji, T. K., Bowie, C. R., Brooks, H., Butters, M. A., Chen, Y., Fischer, C. E., Flint, A. J., Herrmann, N., et al. (2026) · American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2026.04.008 · Cited by 2
Maier, L. E., Minhas, J. S., Hoedemaekers, C., & Ainslie, P. N. (2026) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1177/0271678x261447779 · Cited by 2
“38 For example, the frontal lobe receives significant perfusion in both sexes, but is even greater in females.”
InfluentialRobust but independent sex differences in human brain function, structure, and behavior
Liu, S., Mahony, B. W., Whitman, E. T., Gotts, S. J., Moraczewski, D., Thomas, A., Martin, A. D., & Raznahan, A. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-73262-2 · Cited by 5
“It may also be that sex differences in the neuroimaging and behavioral features examined herein show stronger inter-relationships during dynamic windows of sex-biased brain development 17,79,80 and ageing 81 .”
Berry, S. C., Suri, H. K., Lisi, M., Ravenhill, J. P., Aggleton, J. P., & Hodgetts, C. J. (2026) · Imaging Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/imag.a.1420 · Cited by 2
“…neuroimaging research projects investigating general sex differences in brain region size have portrayed a complex set of results ( DeCasien et al., 2022; Eliot et al., 2021; Lotze et al., 2019; Ritchie et al., 2018; Ruigrok et al., 2014; Sanchis-Segura et al., 2019; C. M. Williams et al., 2021a).”
Indian Women Leaders in the NGO Sector
Abichandani, Y., & Babu, V. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68816-9_12 · Cited by 2
Au, A. K. Y., Chen, S. X., & Cross, S. E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108561716.017 · Cited by 2
A Gendered Light on Empathy, Prosocial Behavior, and Forgiveness
Karniol, R., & Čehajić‐Clancy, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108561716.020 · Cited by 1
Barnett, B. R., Yi, S. Y., Poetzel, M. J., Dodd, K., Stowe, N., & Yu, J.-P. J. (2021) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0426-20.2020 · Cited by 2
“In concordance with both the above within-male and within-female ROI comparisons and with the existing literature examining general sex differences in the adult human brain, the direct comparison of Disc1 svD2 male to Disc1 svD2 female rats demonstrates that FA values are significantly lower in female rats than in mal…”
ResultThe contributions of brain structural and functional variance in predicting age, sex and treatment
Chen, N.-X., Fu, G. C., Chen, X., Li, L., Milham, M. P., Lui, S., & Yan, C. (2021) · Neuroimage Reports · doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2021.100024 · Cited by 2
“N.-X. Chen et al. compensatory mechanisms to reduce functional discrepancies between males and females (De Vries, 2004; McCarthy and Arnold, 2011; Ritchie et al., 2018).”
Sex Differences in the Human Brain
Franks, D. D. (2019) · SpringerBriefs in sociology · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-1600-8_8 · Cited by 2
Sun, J., Zhao, W., Xie, Y., Zhou, F., Wu, L., Li, Y., Li, H., Li, Y., Zeng, C., Han, X., et al. (2023) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103454 · Cited by 2
“The influence of advancing age and sex on the PBSI measures always be included (Doucet et al., 2019), since age and sex are major contributors to brain structural variation (Dima et al., 2022; Frangou et al., 2022; Ritchie et al., 2018; Wierenga et al., 2018).”
BackgroundSissons, S. M., & Dotta, B. T. (2024) · International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1002/jdn.10361 · Cited by 2
“Brain regions exhibiting sexual dimorphism encompass the amygdala, hippocampus and vasculature, influencing patterns of cerebral blood flow (Kaczkurkin et al., 2019; Ritchie et al., 2017).”
Zhou, J. L., Wang, H., Pao, C., Zou, Z., & Zou, Z. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-19308-w · Cited by 3
“In addition, their brain morphology and connectivity are different, and the dimorphic state of the brain may also influence nutritional needs, behavioral traits as well as susceptibility to pressure [90].”
BackgroundShadli, S. M., Donegan, C. J., Fahmi, M. S. B. M., Russell, B. R., Glue, P., & McNaughton, N. (2024) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/02698811241275627 · Cited by 2
“As prior research has established structural and functional brain differences (Ritchie et al., 2018) and brain activity differences between males and females, this may have affected the GCSR observed.”
ResultLong, H., Wu, H., Sun, C., Xu, X., Yang, X.-H., Xiao, J., Lv, M., Chen, Q., & Fan, M. (2024) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120955 · Cited by 2
“Studies have identified sex differences in brain structure and function using multimodal MRI with key biomarkers, such as ReHo, gray matter volume (GMV), and fractional anisotropy (FA) (Ritchie et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2020a).”
Is Being Male a Marker of Aggression? Evidence for the Decoupling of Sex and Gender Role Orientation
Li, Z., Liu, Y., Liu, W., & Chen, H. (2024) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci14121176 · Cited by 2
“Longitudinal studies, functional MRI, or non-invasive brain stimulation may provide further insight into these relationships.”
The left amygdala is genetically sexually-dimorphic: multi-omics analysis of structural MRI volumes
Gui, Y., Zhou, G., Cui, S., Li, H., Lu, H. J., & Zhao, H. (2025) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-025-03223-8 · Cited by 4
“In contrast, Ritchie [4] discovered signi fi cant differences in brain structure, connectivity, and function between males and females.”
InfluentialMoraes, C. A. D. C., Šindelář, J., Habicht, M. E., Sìneo, L., Beaini, T. L., Varotto, E., & Galassi, F. M. (2025) · Anthropological Review · doi:10.18778/1898-6773.87.4.06 · Cited by 2
“When applying the conversion of the endocranium to brain volume, reducing the value by 9.81% (Mo-raes et al. 2023), the volume is 1305 cm³, which falls within the standard devia - tion for modern men, which is 1234 cm³ (± 98) (Ritchie et al. 2018).”
InfluentialBegdache, L., Al‐Amery, A., Nagorny, K., Chowdhury, U., Rosenberg, L., & Ertem, Z. (2025) · Health Science Reports · doi:10.1002/hsr2.70787 · Cited by 5
Gender and Personality Research in Psychology
Laher, S., Cheung, F. M., & Zeinoun, P. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108561716.016 · Cited by 3
Psychosexual Development, Intersex States, and Sexual Dysfunctions
Segarra, R., Isern-Tena, C., Cañas-Jiménez, S., & González-Rodriguez, G. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15179-9_10 · Cited by 3
Intercultural Relationships, Migrant Women, and Intersection of Identities
Kashima, E. S., & Safdar, S. F. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108561716.036 · Cited by 2
Feminist Theory and Methodologies
Pande, R., Liu, W., & Tseng, H. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108561716.003 · Cited by 2
Hyatt, C. S., Listyg, B. S., Owens, M. M., Carter, N. T., Carter, D. R., Lynam, D. R., Harden, K. P., & Miller, J. D. (2022) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12704 · Cited by 3
Greater variability in rhesus macaque ( Macaca mulatta ) endocranial volume among males than females
Colby, A. E., DeCasien, A. R., Cooper, E. B., & Higham, J. P. (2022) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2022.0728 · Cited by 2
Bolton, C. J., Khan, O. A., Moore, E. E., Pechman, K. R., Davis, L. T., Liu, D., Landman, B. A., Gifford, K. A., Hohman, T. J., & Jefferson, A. L. (2023) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103393 · Cited by 3
P300 in peripheral neuropathy: cognitive functions assessment and gender effect
Mejahed, M., Ibrahim, A. M., Haydara, T., Ragab, S. M., & Gabr, T. A. (2023) · Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s43166-023-00223-8 · Cited by 2
“For example, it has been demonstrated that females have greater corpus callosum diameters and more parietal lobe grey matter volume [42].”
BackgroundINSIDER: Interpretable sparse matrix decomposition for RNA expression data analysis
Zhao, K., Huang, S., Lin, C., Sham, P. C., So, H., & Lin, Z. (2024) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1011189 · Cited by 1
The anatomical bases of the 3D digital facial approximation of the Zlatý kůň 1 woman (ca. 43,000 BP)
Moraes, C. A. D. C., Galassi, F. M., Sìneo, L., Šindelář, J., Varotto, E., Mietlińska, J., Antunes‐Ferreira, N., Habicht, M. E., & Beaini, T. L. (2024) · Anthropological Review · doi:10.18778/1898-6773.87.2.04 · Cited by 2
“Therefore, when using data from Ritchie et al. (2018), Zlatý kůň 1’s brain is 3.53 SD above the average for females.”
MethodResultInfluentialLahey, B. B., Hinton, K. E., Meyer, F. C., Villalta‐Gil, V., Hulle, C. A. V., Applegate, B. E., Yang, X., & Zald, D. H. (2020) · Personality Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/pen.2020.3 · Cited by 2
“The present analyses confirmed previous reports of sex differences in FA in the brains of females and males population (Ritchie et al., 2018; Tamnes et al., 2018; van Hemmen et al., 2017) and revealed significant sex differences in predictive associations between CADS dispositional constructs rated…”
BackgroundMethodResultBerkowitz, M., Stern, E., Hofer, S. I., & Deiglmayr, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108561716.032 · Cited by 3
Uncovering a role for the dorsal hippocampal commissure in episodic memoryPreprint
Postans, M., Parker, G., Lundell, H., Ptito, M., Hamandi, K., Gray, W., Aggleton, J. P., Dyrby, T. B., Jones, D. K., & Winter, M. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/415158 · Cited by 2
A parsimonious model for mass-univariate vertex-wise analysisPreprint
Couvy‐Duchesne, B., Zhang, F., Kemper, K. E., Sidorenko, J., Wray, N. R., Visscher, P. M., Colliot, O., & Yang, J. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.01.22.427735 · Cited by 2
“…GLM approaches could contain many redundant associations, some of which are likely to be false positives induced by confounding factors that cause correlation between vertices (e.g. (Cox et al., 2019; Navas-Sanchez et al., 2016; Ritchie et al., 2018; Tamnes et al., 2017), see also Figure 1b).”
BackgroundZhao, B., Li, T., Li, Y., Fan, Z., Xiong, D., Wang, X., Gao, M., Smith, S. M., & Hongtu Zhu, B. (2022) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.02.22.22271371 · Cited by 2
Sex vs Gender: A Biological Location for Gender, not Sex.Preprint
Woodhill, B. M., & Samuels, C. A. (2021) · doi:10.33774/coe-2020-k7gt1-v4 · Cited by 3
Klimaj, V., Safron, A., Sylva, D., Rosenthal, A. M., Li, M., Walter, M., & Bailey, J. M. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/62wvd · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Ritchie, S. J., Cox, S. R., Shen, X., Lombardo, M. V., Reus, L. M., Alloza, C., Harris, M. A., Alderson, H. L., Hunter, S., Neilson, E., Liewald, D. C. M., Auyeung, B., Whalley, H. C., Lawrie, S. M., Gale, C. R., Bastin, M. E., McIntosh, A. M., & Deary, I. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Queen Margaret Hospital (GB)
- NHS Lothian (GB)
- Department of Psychology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Corresponding author
- Ritchie, Stuart J
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-05-16
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2959-2975
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- PMC
- PMC6041980
- OpenAlex
- W2952574438
- Cited by
- 855
- References
- 125
- Citations by year
- 2026: 75 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 130 · 2020: 138 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 35
- FWCI
- 88.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- CCACE (MR/K026992/1)
- MRC (MR/M013111/1)
- Dementias Platform UK (MR/L015382/1)
- STRADL (104036/Z/14/Z)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- sex differences, adult human brain, brain structure, brain function, brain volume, cortical thickness, white matter fractional anisotropy, functional connectome, default mode network, sensorimotor cortex, UK Biobank
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen, Rest, Sex Characteristics, Biological Specimen Banks, Community Health Planning, Connectome, White Matter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review