Cited by 27Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Role of adult-born versus preexisting neurons born at p0 in olfactory perception in a complex olfactory environment in mice

Open access
Forest, Jérémy, Chalençon, Laura, Midroit, Maëllie, Terrier, Claire, Caillé, Isabelle, Sacquet, Joëlle, Benetollo, Claire, Martin, Killian +3 more·2019·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Olfactory perceptual learning is defined as an improvement in the discrimination of perceptually close odorants after passive exposure to these odorants. In mice, simple olfactory perceptual learning involving the discrimination of two odorants depends on an increased number of adult-born neurons in the olfactory bulb, which refines the bulbar output. However, the olfactory environment is complex, raising the question of the adjustment of the bulbar network to multiple discrimination challenges. Perceptual learning of 1 to 6 pairs of similar odorants led to discrimination of all learned odor pairs. Increasing complexity did not increase adult-born neuron survival but enhanced the number of adult-born neurons responding to learned odorants and their spine density. Moreover, only complex learning induced morphological changes in neurons of the granule cell layer born during the first day of life (P0). Selective optogenetic inactivation of either population confirmed functional involvement of adult-born neurons regardless of the enrichment complexity, while preexisting neurons were required for complex discrimination only.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhz105

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forest, J., Chalençon, L., Midroit, M., Terrier, C., Caillé, I., Sacquet, J., Benetollo, C., Martin, K., Richard, M., Didier, A., & Mandairon, N.
Affiliations
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Mandairon, Nathalie
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2019-06-19
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
534-549
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2953340735
Cited by
27
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • Lyon 1 University
  • French Ministry for Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
adult neurogenesis, adult-born neurons, olfactory bulb, odor discrimination, granule cells, dendritic spine density, optogenetic inactivation
MeSH terms
Animals, Discrimination Learning, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neurons, Odorants, Olfactory Bulb, Neurogenesis, Olfactory Perception, Optogenetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review