The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differences in Perception of Everyday Odors: a Japanese-German Cross-cultural Study
Open accessAbstract
There is a growing appreciation that experience with odors may strongly influence their perception. To further investigate this, the responses of 40 Japanese and 44 age-matched German women to everyday odorants were compared. Subjects were presented with 18 stimuli in squeeze bottles and asked to rate them according to intensity, familiarity, pleasantness and edibility, to describe associations elicited by them and, if possible, to name them. One-third of the odorants were presumed to be familiar to the Japanese only, one-third to the Germans and one-third to both populations. Significant differences were found between the two populations on all measures. Better performance by the Japanese in providing appropriate descriptors for 'Japanese' odorants and by the Germans for 'European' odorants supported the pre-selection of stimuli as culture-typical. Particularly clear differences between the two populations were found in pleasantness ratings. In general, a positive relationship was found between pleasantness and judgement of stimuli as edible, suggesting that culture-specific experiences-particularly of foods-may significantly influence odor perception. Somewhat unexpectedly, significant differences were also found between the two populations in intensity ratings for some odorants. These differences did not seem simply to be artefacts of the test situation and raise the possibility that experience may even influence such basic aspects of odor perception as stimulus intensity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Guitton, H., & Siegel, S. (1958) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498751 · Cited by 35,245
Smell and Taste in Health and Disease
(1992) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-116-1-96 · Cited by 964
Development of the 12‐Item Cross‐Cultural Smell Identification Test(CC‐SIT)
Doty, R. L., Marcus, A., & William Lee, W. (1996) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1097/00005537-199603000-00021 · Cited by 729
Sex differences in odor identification ability: A cross-cultural analysis
Doty, R. L., Applebaum, S., Zusho, H., & Settle, R. G. (1985) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(85)90067-3 · Cited by 322
Associations to odors: Interference, mnemonics, and verbal labeling.
Lawless, H., & Engen, T. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.3.1.52 · Cited by 301
Ability to perceive androstenone can be acquired by ostensibly anosmic people.
Wysocki, C. J., Dorries, K. M., & Beauchamp, G. K. (1989) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.86.20.7976 · Cited by 289
Remembering Odors and Their Names
Engen, T. (1987) · American Scientist · Cited by 224
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-0280 · Cited by 222
Perception of complex smells and tastes
Laing, D. G. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 209
Experience facilitates olfactory quality discrimination
Rabin, M. D. (1988) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03207487 · Cited by 209
Cited by
An Odor is Not Worth a Thousand Words: From Multidimensional Odors to Unidimensional Odor Objects
Yeshurun, Y., & Sobel, N. (2010) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163639 · Cited by 485
Wolkoff, P., Wilkins, C. K., Clausen, P. A., & Nielsen, G. D. (2006) · Indoor Air · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00393.x · Cited by 348
Indoor air pollutants in office environments: Assessment of comfort, health, and performance
Wolkoff, P. (2013) · International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health · doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.08.001 · Cited by 342
The Role of Odor-Evoked Memory in Psychological and Physiological Health
Herz, R. (2016) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci6030022 · Cited by 310
Saive, A.-L., Royet, J.-P., & Plailly, J. (2014) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00240 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Ayabe-Kanamura, S., Schicker, I., Laska, M., Hudson, R., Distel, H., Kobayakawa, T., & Saito, S.
- Venue
- Chemical Senses
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-02-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-38
- ISSN
- 0379-864X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3553
- OpenAlex
- W2131633167
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences in Perception of Everyday Odors: a Japanese-German Cross-cultural Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/chemse/23.1.31
- The paper
- Ayabe-Kanamura, S., Schicker, I., Laska, M., Hudson, R., Distel, H., Kobayakawa, T., & Saito, S. (1998). Differences in Perception of Everyday Odors: a Japanese-German Cross-cultural Study. Chemical Senses. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/23.1.31
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.