Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 222

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Odor sensation and memory

·1992·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Preface The Human Uses of Olfaction Odor Detection and Discrimination Arousal Familiarity The Persistence of Odor Odor Exposure and Odor Sensitivity Odor Processing Monitoring Odors Odor Constancy Keeping Track of Odor Quality Keeping Track of Odor Intensity Other Modalities Smells The Perception of Pollution The Psychology of Odor Perception Sources of Malodor Deodorization Fragrances and Perfumes Theories of Odor Therapy The Personal Uses of Perfume The Role of Experience Body Odors Kinship Recognition Synchronization of Menstrual Cycles Menstrual Cycle and Odor Sensitivity Odors as Aphrodisiacs The Effect of Loss of Odor Sensitivity Mother-Infant Bonding Odor Memory Limitations of Odor Memory The Special Attributes of Odor Memory The Role of Odor in Encoding Memories Loss of Odor Sensitivity The Psychology of Anosmia The Unity of Perception Diagnostic Tests Causes of Individual Differences Affected Olfactory Mechanisms Treatments The Odor Sensorium Neophobia False-Alarm Response Bias Plasticity Ecological Encoding Proactive Interference Recognition Memory An Epiphenomenal Mnemonic References Index

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.30-0280

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 222

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1992-09-01
Volume
30
Issue
01
Pages
30-0280-30-0280
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W1575828663
Cited by
222
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Odor sensation and memory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.30-0280
The paper
Odor sensation and memory. (1992). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.30-0280

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.