The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of the Monell forced-choice, paired-comparison tracking procedure for determining sweet taste preferences across the lifespan.
Open accessAbstract
Lack of methodology to assess taste in children limits its measurement in research studies that include pediatric populations. We used the Monell 2-series, forced-choice tracking method to measure sucrose preferences of a racially/ethnically diverse sample (n = 949) of children, adolescents, and adults. Reliability was assessed by comparing the results of the first series with the second series. Validity was assessed by relating participants' sucrose preferences to their preferences for foods varying in sweetness. The task required, on average, 7 presentations of aqueous sucrose solution pairs. Children and adolescents preferred more concentrated sweetness than adults (P < 0.001). Black children/adolescents preferred a more concentrated sucrose solution than did White children/adolescents even when gender, parental education level, and family income were used as covariates. Data from a single series were sufficient to detect age-related differences but insufficient to detect racial/ethnic differences in sweet preferences. Level of sweetness preferred significantly correlated with the sugar content of favorite cereals (P < 0.001) and beverages (P < 0.02). This method is brief and has evidence of reliability and external validity. Although a single series will yield useful information about age-related differences in taste preferences, the 2-series version should be considered when differences in race/ethnicity are of interest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For example, in a recent study of 930 participants, children most preferred a 0.54-mol/L sucrose concentration (32) that was equivalent to 11 tsp (~44 g) of sugar in an 8-oz (240 mL) glass of water, nearly twice the sugar concentration of a typical cola.”
From Sweetness and Food Preference (2012) · cites this paper as [32]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
(1998) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e565682010-001 · Cited by 9,453
CDC GROWTH CHARTS FOR THE UNITED STATES: METHODS AND DEVELOPMENT 2000
Kuczmarski, R. J., Ogden, C. L., Guo, S. S., Strawn, L. G., Flegal, K. M., & Mei, Z. (2002) · Cited by 6,426
2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development.
Kuczmarski, R. J., Ogden, C. L., Guo, S. S., Grummer‐Strawn, L. M., Flegal, K. M., Mei, Z., Wei, R. X., Curtin, L. R., Roche, A. F., & Johnson, C. L. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 3,716
(1998) · PubMed · Cited by 2,737
Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation
Doty, R. L. (2003) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203911457 · Cited by 1,228
Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2005
SKOLNIK, N., & King, M. (2005) · Family Practice News · doi:10.1016/s0300-7073(05)71075-6 · Cited by 1,072
(1989) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1203/00006450-198902000-00010 · Cited by 885
McKeown, N. M., Meigs, J. B., Liu, S., Saltzman, E., Wilson, P. W. F., & Jacques, P. F. (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.2.538 · Cited by 786
Genetic and environmental determinants of bitter perception and sweet preferences.
Mennella, J. A., Pepino, M. Y., & Reed, D. R. (2005) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1582 · Cited by 576 · cited 5×
“Each of these issues is addressed in the Monell 2-series, forced-choice, pairedcomparison, tracking technique developed by Beauchamp and Cowart (1990) and Cowart and Beauchamp (1990) to measure salt preferences and later modified by Mennella et al. (2005, 2010) to measure sucrose preferences.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 2002, Vital and health statistics. Series 5, Comparative international vital and health statistics reports, 11, 1
- 1998, Obesity, 6, 51S
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vision assessment using the NIH Toolbox
Varma, R., McKean‐Cowdin, R., Vitale, S., Slotkin, J., & Hays, R. D. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182876e0a · Cited by 1,200
Early Influences on the Development of Food Preferences
Ventura, A. K., & Worobey, J. (2013) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.02.037 · Cited by 641
Ontogeny of taste preferences: basic biology and implications for health
Mennella, J. A. (2014) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.113.067694 · Cited by 446
Self-citationThe sweetness and bitterness of childhood: Insights from basic research on taste preferences
Mennella, J. A., & Bobowski, N. K. (2015) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.015 · Cited by 403
Self-citationDrewnowski, A., Mennella, J. A., Johnson, S. L., & Bellisle, F. (2012) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.111.149575 · Cited by 347
“54-mol/L sucrose concentration (32) that was equivalent to 11 tsp (~44 g) of sugar in an 8-oz (240 mL) glass of water, nearly twice the sugar concentration of a typical cola.”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mennella, J. A., Lukasewycz, L. D., Griffith, J. W., & Beauchamp, G. K.
- Affiliations
- Monell Chemical Senses Center (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- Chemical Senses
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-01-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 345-355
- ISSN
- 0379-864X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3553
- PMC
- PMC3073533
- OpenAlex
- W2107163993
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 8.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Chemical Senses (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Pennsylvania Department of Health
- National Institutes of Health (HHS-N-260–2006-00007-C)
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA009523, R01AA09523)
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD37119)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01‐HD37119, R01HD037119)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- sweet taste preference, sucrose preference, racial and ethnic differences, Black children, test-retest reliability, generalizability
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Body Weight, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Food Preferences, Humans, Male, Psychometrics, Sucrose, Taste Perception, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
