The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Review of Self-Testing for HIV: Research and Policy Priorities in a New Era of HIV Prevention
Open accessAbstract
Inadequate uptake of testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) remains a primary bottleneck toward universal access to treatment and care, and is an obstacle to realizing the potential of new interventions for preventing HIV infection, including treatment for prevention and preexposure prophylaxis. HIV self-testing offers an approach to scaling up testing that could be high impact, low cost, confidential, and empowering for users. Although HIV self-testing was first considered >20 years ago, it has not been widely implemented. We conducted a review of policy and research on HIV self-testing, which indicates that policy is shifting toward a more flexible approach with less emphasis on pretest counseling and that HIV self-testing has been adopted in a number of settings. Empirical research on self-testing is limited, resulting in a lack of an evidence base upon which to base policy recommendations. Relevant research and investment in programs are urgently needed to enable consideration of developing formalized self-testing programs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Attitudes and Acceptability on HIV Self-testing Among Key Populations: A Literature Review
Figueroa, C., Johnson, C., Verster, A., & Baggaley, R. (2015) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-015-1097-8 · Cited by 451
Self-citationAcceptability of HIV self-testing: a systematic literature review
Krause, J., Subklew-Sehume, F., Kenyon, C., & Colebunders, R. (2013) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-735 · Cited by 332
Witzel, T. C., Eshun-Wilson, I., Jamil, M. S., Tilouche, N., Figueroa, C., Johnson, C. C., Reid, D., Baggaley, R., Siegfried, N., Burns, F. M., et al. (2020) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01835-z · Cited by 210
Self-citationSyphilis Self-testing: A Nationwide Pragmatic Study Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in China
Wang, C., Cheng, W., Li, C., Tang, W., Ong, J. J., Smith, M. K., Fu, H., Marks, M., Nie, J., Zheng, H., et al. (2020) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciz603 · Cited by 57
Implementation of a National Workplace Wellness Program for Health Workers in Botswana
Ledikwe, J. H., Semo, B.-W., Sebego, M., Mpho, M., Mothibedi, H., Mawandia, S., & O’Malley, G. (2017) · Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1097/jom.0000000000001028 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Napierala Mavedzenge, S., Baggaley, R., & Corbett, E. L.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-03-13
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 126-138
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2126920820
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Self-Testing for HIV: Research and Policy Priorities in a New Era of HIV Prevention. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cid/cit156
- The paper
- Napierala Mavedzenge, S., Baggaley, R., & Corbett, E. L. (2013). A Review of Self-Testing for HIV: Research and Policy Priorities in a New Era of HIV Prevention. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit156
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.