The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Therapy: Past, Present, and Future
Abstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Vancomycin was the "gold standard" of treatment for serious MRSA infections; however, the emergence of less-susceptible strains, poor clinical outcomes, and increased nephrotoxicity with high-dose therapy are challenging its current role as first-line therapy. Linezolid is recommended for PO or IV treatment of skin and skin structure infections (SSSIs) and pneumonia caused by MRSA. Daptomycin (IV) should be considered in patients with MRSA bacteremia and right-sided endocarditis as well as in complicated SSSIs, but should not be used to treat MRSA pneumonia. Tigecycline and telavancin are alternative (IV) treatments for SSSIs caused by MRSA; however, safety concerns have limited use of these agents. Ceftaroline is the newest of the approved parenteral agents for SSSIs caused by MRSA. Several investigational agents with activity against drug-resistant gram-positive pathogens are being developed primarily for treatment of MRSA infections, including tedizolid, dalbavancin, and oritavancin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kullar, R., Davis, S. L., Levine, D. P., & Rybak, M. J. (2011) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cir124 · Cited by 463 · cited 2×
“factor can serve as a predictor of success or failure for vancomycin therapy [17].”
BackgroundMoellering, R. C. (2012) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkr437 · Cited by 236
Cited by
Linezolid: a review of its properties, function, and use in critical care
Hashemian, S. M., Farhadi, T., & Ganjparvar, M. (2018) · Drug Design, Development and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dddt.s164515 · Cited by 459
ABM Clinical Protocol #4: Mastitis, Revised March 2014
Amir, L. H., & The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Protocol Committee (2014) · Breastfeeding Medicine · doi:10.1089/bfm.2014.9984 · Cited by 212
Autophagy Mediates Tolerance to Staphylococcus aureus Alpha-Toxin
Maurer, K., Reyes-Robles, T., Alonzo, F., Durbin, J., Torres, V. J., & Cadwell, K. (2015) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2015.03.001 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodvold, K. A., & McConeghy, K. W.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-12-16
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- suppl 1
- Pages
- S20-S27
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2137175695
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Therapy: Past, Present, and Future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cid/cit614
- The paper
- Rodvold, K. A., & McConeghy, K. W. (2014). Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Therapy: Past, Present, and Future. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit614
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.