Cited by 137Antibiotic Use and ResistanceDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsSurgical site infection prevention

Impact of an integrated antibiotic allergy testing program on antimicrobial stewardship: a multicenter evaluation.

Open access
Trubiano, Jason A, Thursky, Karin A, Stewardson, Andrew J, Urbancic, Karen, Worth, Leon J, Jackson, Cheryl, Stevenson, Wendy, Sutherland, Michael +3 more·2017·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background: Despite the high prevalence of patient-reported antibiotic allergy (so-called antibiotic allergy labels [AALs]) and their impact on antibiotic prescribing, incorporation of antibiotic allergy testing (AAT) into antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs (AAT-AMS) is not widespread. We aimed to evaluate the impact of an AAT-AMS program on AAL prevalence, antibiotic usage, and appropriateness of prescribing. Methods: AAT-AMS was implemented at two large Australian hospitals during a 14-month period beginning May 2015. Baseline demographics, AAL history, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, infection history, and antibiotic usage for 12 months prior to testing (pre-AAT-AMS) and 3 months following testing (post-AAT-AMS) were recorded for each participant. Study outcomes included the proportion of patients who were "de-labeled" of their AAL, spectrum of antibiotic courses pre- and post-AAT-AMS, and antibiotic appropriateness (using standard definitions). Results: From the 118 antibiotic allergy-tested patients, 226 AALs were reported (mean, 1.91/patient), with 53.6% involving 1 or more penicillin class drug. AAT-AMS allowed AAL de-labeling in 98 (83%) patients-56% (55/98) with all AALs removed. Post-AAT, prescribing of narrow-spectrum penicillins was more likely (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.81, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-5.42), as was narrow-spectrum β-lactams (aOR, 3.54; 95% CI, 1.98-6.33), and appropriate antibiotics (aOR, 12.27; 95% CI, 5.00-30.09); and less likely for restricted antibiotics (aOR, 0.16; 95% CI, .09-.29), after adjusting for indication, Charlson comorbidity index, and care setting. Conclusions: An integrated AAT-AMS program was effective in both de-labeling of AALs and promotion of improved antibiotic usage and appropriateness, supporting the routine incorporation of AAT into AMS programs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/cix244

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Penicillin skin testing has become a clinically significant element in antibiotic stewardship programs, and the procedure has been increasingly used by hospital-based pharmacists, hospitalists, and infectious disease physicians as part of overall antibiotic stewardship interventions.

    “Penicillin skin testing has become a clinically significant element in antibiotic stewardship programs, and the procedure has been increasingly used by hospital-based pharmacists, hospitalists, and infectious disease physicians (670,672,673,678,679) as part of overall antibiotic stewardship interventions.”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [670]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In hospitalized patients and other populations with comorbidities, the typical rates of validated penicillin allergy among patients who report a history of penicillin allergy are 2.5%-9.0%.

    “In hospitalized patients and other populations with comorbidities, the typical rates of validated penicillin allergy among patients who report a history of penicillin allergy are 2.5%–9.0% (670–673).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [670]

    The Discussion reports that testing removed 85% of penicillin allergy labels, supporting the point that many reported allergies were not validated. It does not give a validated-allergy rate of 2.5%–9.0% or establish that range as typical across hospitalized patients and other populations with comorbidities. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • When integrated into stewardship, the rates of ß-lactam antibiotic use increased substantially.

    “When integrated into stewardship, the rates of ß-lactam antibiotic use increased substantially (670).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [670]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Pichler WJ, ed. Drug hypersensitivity. Basel: Karger Publishers, 2007:168-89.
  2. Blumenthal KG, Parker RA, Shenoy ES, Walensky RP. Improving clinical out- comes in patients with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and reported penicillin allergy. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 61:741-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trubiano, J. A., Thursky, K. A., Stewardson, A. J., Urbancic, K., Worth, L. J., Jackson, C., Stevenson, W., Sutherland, M., Slavin, M. A., Grayson, M. L., & Phillips, E. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
  • Austin Health (AU)
  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU)
  • Murdoch University (AU)
Corresponding author
Trubiano, Jason A
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2017-05-18
Volume
65
Issue
1
Pages
166-174
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2615507425
Cited by
137
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 1
FWCI
11.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1P50GM115305-01, 1R01AI103348-01, P30 AI110527, 1R13 AR071267-01)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical site infection prevention
Keywords
antibiotic allergy testing, antimicrobial stewardship, delabeling, penicillin allergy, antibiotic prescribing appropriateness, narrow-spectrum antibiotics, beta-lactam antibiotics, restricted antibiotics, hospital antibiotic use
MeSH terms
Antimicrobial Stewardship, Aged, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Australia, Drug Hypersensitivity, Female, Hospitals, Humans, Male, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Middle Aged, Penicillins, Skin Tests, Inappropriate Prescribing, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review