Cited by 117Drug-Induced Adverse ReactionsAntibiotic Use and ResistancePharmacy and Medical Practices

Implementation of a pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling service in a public hospital.

du Plessis, Tanya, Walls, Genevieve, Jordan, Anthony, Holland, David J·2019·Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inaccurate allergy labelling results in inappropriate antimicrobial management of the patient, which may affect clinical outcome, increase the risk of adverse events and increase costs. Inappropriate use of alternative antibiotics has implications for antimicrobial stewardship programmes and microbial resistance. METHODS: All adult inpatients labelled as penicillin allergic were identified and screened for eligibility by the study pharmacist. An accurate allergy and medication history was taken. Patients were 'de-labelled', underwent oral challenge or were referred to an immunology clinic, if study criteria were met. All patients included in the study were followed-up 1 year after intervention. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty eligible patients with a label of 'penicillin allergy' were identified. The prevalence of reported penicillin allergy at Middlemore Hospital was 11%. We found that 80% of study patients could be 'de-labelled'. Of those, 80% were 'de-labelled' after an interview with the pharmacist alone, 16% had an uneventful oral challenge and 4% were deemed to be inappropriately labelled after referral to an immunology clinic. Appropriately labelled patients accounted for 20% of the study population. Changes to inpatient antibiotic therapy were recommended in 61% of 'de-labelled' patients, of which no patients had adverse events after commencing on penicillin antibiotics. At the 1 year follow-up, 98% of patients who were 'de-labelled' had no adverse events to repeated administration of penicillin antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that a pharmacist-led allergy management service is a safe option to promote antimicrobial stewardship and appropriate allergy labelling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jac/dky575

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Penicillin skin testing has become a clinically significant element in antibiotic stewardship programs, and the procedure has been increasingly used by hospital-based pharmacists, hospitalists, and infectious disease physicians as part of overall antibiotic stewardship interventions.

    “Penicillin skin testing has become a clinically significant element in antibiotic stewardship programs, and the procedure has been increasingly used by hospital-based pharmacists, hospitalists, and infectious disease physicians (670,672,673,678,679) as part of overall antibiotic stewardship interventions.”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [679]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
du Plessis, T., Walls, G., Jordan, A., & Holland, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Infection Services, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
  • Middlemore Hospital (NZ)
  • Auckland City Hospital (NZ)
Venue
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Published
2019-02-06
Volume
74
Issue
5
Pages
1438-1446
ISSN
  • 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2091
OpenAlex
W2913987477
Cited by
117
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Departments of Pharmacy and Infectious Diseases of Middlemore Hospital
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
penicillin allergy, pharmacist-led services, oral drug challenge, allergy screening, antimicrobial stewardship, inappropriate antibiotic use, adverse drug reactions
MeSH terms
Antimicrobial Stewardship, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Drug Hypersensitivity, Female, Health Plan Implementation, Hospitals, Public, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New Zealand, Penicillins, Pharmacists, Product Labeling, Prospective Studies, Skin, Skin Tests, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review