Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 552

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Maternal Colonization With Group B Streptococcus and Serotype Distribution Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses

Open access
Russell, Neal J, Seale, Anna C, O’Driscoll, Megan, O’Sullivan, Catherine, Bianchi-Jassir, Fiorella, Gonzalez-Guarin, Juan, Lawn, Joy E, Baker, Carol J, Bartlett, Linda, Cutland, Clare, Gravett, Michael G, Heath, Paul T, Le Doare, Kirsty, Madhi, Shabir A, Rubens, Craig E, Schrag, Stephanie, Sobanjo-ter Meulen, Ajoke, Vekemans, Johan, Saha, Samir K, Ip, Margaret, for the GBS Maternal Colonization Investigator Group, Asturias, Edwin, Gaind, Rajid, Kumar, Parveen, Anthony, Beena, Madrid, Lola, Bassat, Quique, Zhu, Chendi, Luo, Mingjing, Nagarjuna, Daram, Majumder, Subradeep·2017·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background.Maternal rectovaginal colonization with group B Streptococcus (GBS) is the most common pathway for GBS disease in mother, fetus, and newborn.This article, the second in a series estimating the burden of GBS, aims to determine the prevalence and serotype distribution of GBS colonizing pregnant women worldwide. Methods.We conducted systematic literature reviews (PubMed/Medline, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature [LILACS], World Health Organization Library Information System [WHOLIS], and Scopus), organized Chinese language searches, and sought unpublished data from investigator groups.We applied broad inclusion criteria to maximize data inputs, particularly from low-and middle-income contexts, and then applied new meta-analyses to adjust for studies with less-sensitive sampling and laboratory techniques.We undertook meta-analyses to derive pooled estimates of maternal GBS colonization prevalence at national and regional levels.Results.The dataset regarding colonization included 390 articles, 85 countries, and a total of 299 924 pregnant women.Our adjusted estimate for maternal GBS colonization worldwide was 18% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17%-19%), with regional variation (11%-35%), and lower prevalence in Southern Asia (12.5% [95% CI, 10%-15%]) and Eastern Asia (11% [95% CI, 10%-12%]).Bacterial serotypes I-V account for 98% of identified colonizing GBS isolates worldwide.Serotype III, associated with invasive disease, accounts for 25% (95% CI, 23%-28%), but is less frequent in some South American and Asian countries.Serotypes VI-IX are more common in Asia.Conclusions.GBS colonizes pregnant women worldwide, but prevalence and serotype distribution vary, even after adjusting for laboratory methods.Lower GBS maternal colonization prevalence, with less serotype III, may help to explain lower GBS disease incidence in regions such as Asia.High prevalence worldwide, and more serotype data, are relevant to prevention efforts.Keywords.group B Streptococcus; colonization; vaginal; pregnancy; serotypes.Group B Streptococcus (GBS; Streptococcus agalactiae) via maternal rectovaginal colonization, causes a spectrum of disease including maternal infection, stillbirth, and early-and late-onset sepsis in newborns, and may contribute to preterm delivery and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy [1].Thus, ascertaining the worldwide prevalence and serotype distribution of GBS colonizing the rectovaginal tracts of pregnant women is critical [2][3][4].There may be true differences in GBS maternal colonization prevalence, with variation reported by region [5], ethnicity, and socioeconomic status [6].However, some of this variation may be due to methodological issues, such as time of GBS screening (during pregnancy or at delivery [7]), sampling site (in particular, whether rectal samples were performed [8-11]), and laboratory culture techniques, notably use of selective enrichment broth [12].There is no established international standard for sampling for maternal GBS colonization; however, the recommendation by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/cix658

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 552

Metadata

Authors
Russell, N. J., Seale, A. C., O’Driscoll, M., O’Sullivan, C., Bianchi-Jassir, F., Gonzalez-Guarin, J., Lawn, J. E., Baker, C. J., Bartlett, L., Cutland, C., Gravett, M. G., Heath, P. T., Le Doare, K., Madhi, S. A., Rubens, C. E., Schrag, S., Sobanjo-ter Meulen, A., Vekemans, J., Saha, S. K., Ip, M., for the GBS Maternal Colonization Investigator Group, Asturias, E., Gaind, R., Kumar, P., Anthony, B., Madrid, L., Bassat, Q., Zhu, C., Luo, M., Nagarjuna, D., & Majumder, S.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2017-11-06
Volume
65
Issue
suppl_2
Pages
S100-S111
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2767698099
Cited by
552
References
10
FWCI
7.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maternal Colonization With Group B Streptococcus and Serotype Distribution Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cid/cix658
The paper
Russell, N. J., Seale, A. C., O’Driscoll, M., O’Sullivan, C., Bianchi-Jassir, F., Gonzalez-Guarin, J., Lawn, J. E., Baker, C. J., Bartlett, L., Cutland, C., Gravett, M. G., Heath, P. T., Le Doare, K., Madhi, S. A., Rubens, C. E., Schrag, S., Sobanjo-ter Meulen, A., Vekemans, J., Saha, S. K., . . . Majumder, S. (2017). Maternal Colonization With Group B Streptococcus and Serotype Distribution Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix658

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.