Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Management of Infants at Risk for Group B Streptococcal Disease

Puopolo, Karen M., Lynfield, Ruth, Cummings, James J., COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN, COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES, Hand, Ivan, Adams-Chapman, Ira, Poindexter, Brenda, Stewart, Dan L., Aucott, Susan W., Goldsmith, Jay P., Mowitz, Meredith, Watterberg, Kristi, Maldonado, Yvonne A., Zaoutis, Theoklis E., Banerjee, Ritu, Barnett, Elizabeth D., Campbell, James D., Gerber, Jeffrey S., Kourtis, Athena P., Munoz, Flor M., Nolt, Dawn, Nyquist, Ann-Christine, O’Leary, Sean T., Sawyer, Mark H., Steinbach, William J., Zangwill, Ken·2019·Pediatrics
DOI 10.1542/peds.2019-1881
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Group B streptococcal (GBS) infection remains the most common cause of neonatal early-onset sepsis and a significant cause of late-onset sepsis among young infants. Administration of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis is the only currently available effective strategy for the prevention of perinatal GBS early-onset disease, and there is no effective approach for the prevention of late-onset disease. The American Academy of Pediatrics joins with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to reaffirm the use of universal antenatal microbiologic-based testing for the detection of maternal GBS colonization to facilitate appropriate administration of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. The purpose of this clinical report is to provide neonatal clinicians with updated information regarding the epidemiology of GBS disease as well current recommendations for the evaluation of newborn infants at risk for GBS disease and for treatment of those with confirmed GBS infection. This clinical report is endorsed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), July 2019, and should be construed as ACOG clinical guidance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2019-1881

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 93 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Puopolo, K. M., Lynfield, R., Cummings, J. J., COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN, COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES, Hand, I., Adams-Chapman, I., Poindexter, B., Stewart, D. L., Aucott, S. W., Goldsmith, J. P., Mowitz, M., Watterberg, K., Maldonado, Y. A., Zaoutis, T. E., Banerjee, R., Barnett, E. D., Campbell, J. D., Gerber, J. S., Kourtis, A. P., Munoz, F. M., Nolt, D., Nyquist, A.-C., O’Leary, S. T., Sawyer, M. H., Steinbach, W. J., & Zangwill, K.
Venue
Pediatrics
Publisher
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Published
2019-08-01
Volume
144
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
DOI
10.1542/peds.2019-1881
OpenAlex
W2953739684
Cited by
317
References
93
FWCI
28.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management of Infants at Risk for Group B Streptococcal Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.2019-1881
The paper
Puopolo, K. M., Lynfield, R., Cummings, J. J., COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN, COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES, Hand, I., Adams-Chapman, I., Poindexter, B., Stewart, D. L., Aucott, S. W., Goldsmith, J. P., Mowitz, M., Watterberg, K., Maldonado, Y. A., Zaoutis, T. E., Banerjee, R., Barnett, E. D., Campbell, J. D., Gerber, J. S., . . . Zangwill, K. (2019). Management of Infants at Risk for Group B Streptococcal Disease. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1881

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.