Cited by 190Antibiotic Use and ResistanceSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentNeutropenia and Cancer Infections

Risk of subsequent sepsis within 90 days after a hospital stay by type of antibiotic exposure.

Baggs, James, Jernigan, John A, Halpin, Alison Laufer, Epstein, Lauren, Hatfield, Kelly M, McDonald, L Clifford·2018·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We examined the risk of sepsis within 90 days after discharge from a previous hospital stay by type of antibiotic received during the previous stay. METHODS: We retrospectively identified a cohort of hospitalized patients from the Truven Health MarketScan Hospital Drug Database. We examined the association between the use of certain antibiotics, determined a priori, during the initial hospital stay and risk of post-discharge sepsis controlling for potential confounding factors in a multivariable logistic regression model. Our primary exposure was receipt of antibiotics more strongly associated with clinically important microbiome disruption. Our primary outcome was a hospital stay within 90 days of the index stay that included an ICD-9-CM discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis (995.92) or septic shock (785.52). RESULTS: Among 516 hospitals, we randomly selected a single stay for eligible patients. Of those, 0.17% developed severe sepsis/septic shock within 90 days after discharge. The risk of sepsis associated with exposure to our high risk antibiotics was 65% higher compared to those without antibiotic exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified an increased risk of sepsis within 90 days of discharge among patients with exposure to high risk or increased quantities of antibiotics during hospitalization. Given a significant proportion of inpatient antimicrobial use may be unnecessary, this study builds on previous evidence suggesting that increased stewardship efforts in hospitals may not only prevent antimicrobial resistance, CDI and other adverse effects, but also reduce unwanted outcomes potentially related to disruption of the microbiota, including sepsis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/cix947

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Potential harms of unnecessary antimicrobials include allergic or hypersensitivity reactions, kidney injury, thrombocytopenia, Clostridioides difficile infection, and antimicrobial resistance.

    “These include a range of adverse events such as allergic or hypersensitivity reactions, kidney injury, thrombocytopenia, Clostridioides difficile infection, and antimicrobial resistance [101–106].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [24]Iwashyna TJ, Odden A, Rohde J, Identifying patients with severe sepsis using administrative claims: patient-level validation of the angus implementation of the international consensus conference definition of severe sepsis. Med Care 2014; 52(6): e39– 43. 23001437 PMC3568444
  2. [40]Kokai-Kun JF, Bristol JA, Setser J, Schlosser M. Nonclinical Safety Assessment of SYN-004: An Oral beta-lactamase for the Protection of the Gut Microbiome From Disruption by Biliary-Excreted, Intravenously Administered Antibiotics. International journal of toxicology 2015. 26700136
  3. [42]Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Critical care medicine 2013; 41(2): 580– 637. 23353941
  4. [44]Sterling SA, Miller WR, Pryor J, Puskarich MA, Jones AE. The Impact of Timing of Antibiotics on Outcomes in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Critical care medicine 2015; 43(9): 1907– 15. 26121073 PMC4597314
  5. [49]Hecker MT, Aron DC, Patel NP, Lehmann MK, Donskey CJ. Unnecessary use of antimicrobials in hospitalized patients: current patterns of misuse with an emphasis on the antianaerobic spectrum of activity. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163(8): 972– 8. 12719208

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baggs, J., Jernigan, J. A., Halpin, A. L., Epstein, L., Hatfield, K. M., & McDonald, L. C.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Baggs, James
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2017-11-09
Volume
66
Issue
7
Pages
1004-1012
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2777682558
Cited by
190
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10
FWCI
9.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
Keywords
sepsis, septic shock, antibiotic exposure, antimicrobial stewardship, microbiome disruption, hospital readmission, Clostridium difficile infection, antimicrobial resistance
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Cross Infection, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Discharge, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Shock, Septic, United States, Sepsis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review