Cited by 181Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchGut microbiota and health

Hospitalization type and subsequent severe sepsis

Open access
Prescott, Hallie C., Dickson, Robert P., Rogers, Mary A. M., Langa, Kenneth M., Iwashyna, Theodore J.·2015·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Hospitalization is associated with microbiome perturbation (dysbiosis), and this perturbation is more severe in patients treated with antimicrobials. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether hospitalizations known to be associated with periods of microbiome perturbation are associated with increased risk of severe sepsis after hospital discharge. METHODS: We studied participants in the U.S. Health and Retirement Study with linked Medicare claims (1998-2010). We measured whether three hospitalization types associated with increasing severity of probable dysbiosis (non-infection-related hospitalization, infection-related hospitalization, and hospitalization with Clostridium difficile infection [CDI]) were associated with increasing risk for severe sepsis in the 90 days after hospital discharge. We used two study designs: the first was a longitudinal design with between-person comparisons and the second was a self-controlled case series design using within-person comparison. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified 43,095 hospitalizations among 10,996 Health and Retirement Study-Medicare participants. In the 90 days following non-infection-related hospitalization, infection-related hospitalization, and hospitalization with CDI, adjusted probabilities of subsequent admission for severe sepsis were 4.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-4.4%), 7.1% (95% CI, 6.6-7.6%), and 10.7% (95% CI, 7.7-13.8%), respectively. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) of severe sepsis was 3.3-fold greater during the 90 days after hospitalizations than during other observation periods. The IRR was 30% greater after an infection-related hospitalization versus a non-infection-related hospitalization. The IRR was 70% greater after a hospitalization with CDI than an infection-related hospitalization without CDI. CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong dose-response relationship between events known to result in dysbiosis and subsequent severe sepsis hospitalization that is not present for rehospitalization for nonsepsis diagnoses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.201503-0483oc

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study of nearly 11,000 patients (Americans, mean age 77 years), the rate of severe sepsis was 3.3 times greater in the 90 days after hospitalization than during all times before or after this period.

    “A recent publication examined admissions of nearly 11,000 patients (Americans, mean age 77 years) and reports a number of intriguing findings: 1) the rate of severe sepsis was 3.3 times greater in the 90 days after hospitalization (for all-cause hospitalization) than during all times before or after this period”

    From Viral Infections, the Microbiome, and Probiotics (2021) · cites this paper as Prescott et al., 2015

  • In the same study, readmission to hospital for severe sepsis was significantly higher (30%-70% more) in patients initially admitted due to infection.

    “and 2) readmission to hospital for severe sepsis was significantly higher (30%–70% more) in those patients who were admitted initially due to infection (Prescott et al., 2015).”

    From Viral Infections, the Microbiome, and Probiotics (2021) · cites this paper as Prescott et al., 2015

  • When more than 10000 hospital inpatients were stratified according to estimated degrees of intestinal dysbiosis, a strong and consistent dose-response relation was found between disorder of the microbiome and subsequent development of severe sepsis.

    “When more than 10000 hospital inpatients were stratified according to estimated degrees of intestinal dysbiosis, a strong and consistent dose–response relation was uncovered between disorder of the microbiome and subsequent development of severe sepsis.”

    From The microbiome and critical illness (2016) · cites this paper as [99]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]Prescott HC, Dickson RP, Rogers MA, Langa KM, Iwashyna TJ. Is dysbiosis a mediator of sepsis? Studying a nationally representative patient sample. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:A2192. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prescott, H. C., Dickson, R. P., Rogers, M. A. M., Langa, K. M., & Iwashyna, T. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Department of Internal Medicine and
Corresponding author
Prescott, Hallie C.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2015-09-01
Volume
192
Issue
5
Pages
581-588
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W1912521894
Cited by
181
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 3
FWCI
11.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (T32 HL007749, R01 AG030155)
  • National Institute on Aging (U01 AG009740)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
severe sepsis, dysbiosis, Clostridium difficile infection, infection-related hospitalization, antimicrobial exposure, older adults, Medicare claims data
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous, Female, Medicare, Hospitalization, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Patient Readmission, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, United States, Incidence, Information Storage and Retrieval, Clostridioides difficile, Sepsis, Dysbiosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review