The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantification of virus-specific antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid and serum: sensitive and specific detection of antibody synthesis in brain
Abstract
Specific antibody synthesis in brain could be detected with maximal sensitivity by combining an advanced enzyme immunoassay with a sophisticated evaluation method that involves calculating the ratio between the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)/serum quotients for specific antibodies (Qspec) and total IgG (QIgG). This Antibody Index (AI = Qspec/QIgG) discriminates between a blood-derived and a pathological, brain-derived specific antibody fraction in CSF and takes into account individual changes in blood/CSF barrier function. For local synthesis of polyclonal IgG in the central nervous system (QIgG greater than QLim), we propose the correction AI = Qspec/QLim (QLim represents that IgG fraction in CSF originating only from blood, calculated from the individual albumin quotient of a single patient). The normal reference range for the AI was between 0.7 and 1.3 (n = 250 control patients for each antibody species). Values of AI greater than or equal to 1.5 indicated a local specific antibody synthesis in the central nervous system. Sensitivity and precision were greatest if we analyzed the virus-specific antibodies in CSF and serum simultaneously with an enzyme immunoassay in continuous concentrations (arbitrary units) instead of titer steps. We have applied the method successfully to antibodies to measles, rubella, herpes simplex, varicella-zoster, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and cytomegalovirus, and to anti-Toxoplasma or -Borrelia antibodies. Clinical relevance is demonstrated for an acute zoster virus infection (monospecific response), chronic diseases such as HIV encephalitis with acute opportunistic Toxoplasma infection, and multiple sclerosis (secondary polyspecific response).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Psychiatric disorders in the encephalitic form of multiple sclerosis
Felgenhauer, K. (1990) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/bf00319661 · Cited by 36
Cited by
Cerebrospinal fluid in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a consensus report.
Andersson, M., Alvarez-Cermeno, J., Bernardi, G., Cogato, I., Fredman, P., Frederiksen, J., Fredrikson, S., Gallo, P., Grimaldi, L. M., Gronning, M., et al. (1994) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.57.8.897 · Cited by 741
Self-citationCerebrospinal fluid analysis: disease-related data patterns and evaluation programs
Reiber, H., & Peter, J. B. (2001) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0022-510x(00)00501-3 · Cited by 731
Self-citationin cooperation with the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS), Jarius, S., Ruprecht, K., Kleiter, I., Borisow, N., Asgari, N., Pitarokoili, K., Pache, F., Stich, O., Beume, L.-A., et al. (2016) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-016-0717-1 · Cited by 429
Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis
Garg, R. K. (2002) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pmj.78.916.63 · Cited by 401
Miklossy, J. (2011) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/1742-2094-8-90 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Reiber, H., & Lange, P.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-07-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1153-1160
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W1932761272
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification of virus-specific antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid and serum: sensitive and specific detection of antibody synthesis in brain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinchem/37.7.1153
- The paper
- Reiber, H., & Lange, P. (1991). Quantification of virus-specific antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid and serum: sensitive and specific detection of antibody synthesis in brain. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/37.7.1153
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.