The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Affinity Chromatography: A Review of Clinical Applications
Abstract
Affinity chromatography is a type of liquid chromatography that makes use of biological-like interactions for the separation and specific analysis of sample components. This review describes the basic principles of affinity chromatography and examines its use in the testing of clinical samples, with an emphasis on HPLC-based methods. Some traditional applications of this approach include the use of boronate, lectin, protein A or protein G, and immunoaffinity supports for the direct quantification of solutes. Newer techniques that use antibody-based columns for on- or off-line sample extraction are examined in detail, as are methods that use affinity chromatography in combination with other analytical methods, such as reversed-phase liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, and capillary electrophoresis. Indirect analyte detection methods are also described in which immunoaffinity chromatography is used to perform flow-based immunoassays. Other applications that are reviewed include affinity-based chiral separations and the use of affinity chromatography for the study of drug or hormone interactions with binding proteins. Some areas of possible future developments are then considered, such as tandem affinity methods and the use of synthetic dyes, immobilized metal ions, molecular imprints, or aptamers as affinity ligands for clinical analytes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantitation of Glycosylated Hemoglobin by Boronate Affinity Chromatography
Flückiger, R., Woodtli, T., & Berger, W. (1984) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.33.1.73 · Cited by 87
Geisslinger, G., Menzel-Soglowek, S., Kamp, H.-D., & Brune, K. (1991) · Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications · doi:10.1016/0378-4347(91)80350-l · Cited by 52
Cited by
Arnau, J., Lauritzen, C., Petersen, G. E., & Pedersen, J. (2006) · Protein Expression and Purification · doi:10.1016/j.pep.2005.12.002 · Cited by 629
Review: Glycation of human serum albumin
Anguizola, J., Matsuda, R., Barnaby, O. S., Hoy, K. S., Wa, C., DeBolt, E., Koke, M., & Hage, D. S. (2013) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2013.07.013 · Cited by 395
Self-citationAntibodies and Genetically Engineered Related Molecules: Production and Purification
Roque, A. C. A., Lowe, C. R., & Taipa, M. A. (2004) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1021/bp030070k · Cited by 360
New trends in sample preparation for clinical and pharmaceutical analysis
Kataoka, H. (2003) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0165-9936(03)00402-3 · Cited by 261
Top‐down proteomics in health and disease: Challenges and opportunities
Gregorich, Z. R., & Ge, Y. (2014) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201300432 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- Hage, D. S.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-05-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 593-615
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W1900726394
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Affinity Chromatography: A Review of Clinical Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinchem/45.5.593
- The paper
- Hage, D. S. (1999). Affinity Chromatography: A Review of Clinical Applications. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/45.5.593
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.