The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genetic Analysis of DNA Excreted in Urine: A New Approach for Detecting Specific Genomic DNA Sequences from Cells Dying in an Organism
Abstract
Background: Cell-free DNA from dying cells recently has been discovered in human blood plasma. In experiments performed on animals and humans, we examined whether this cell-free DNA can cross the kidney barrier and be used as a diagnostic tool. Methods: Mice received subcutaneous injections of either human Raji cells or purified 32P-labeled DNA. DNA was isolated from urine and analyzed by measurement of radioactivity, agarose gel electrophoresis, and PCR. In humans, the permeability of the kidney barrier to polymeric DNA was assessed by detection in urine of sequences that were different from an organism bulk nuclear DNA. Results: In the experiments on laboratory animals, we found that ∼0.06% of injected DNA was excreted into urine within 3 days in a polymeric form and that human-specific Alu sequences that passed through the kidneys could be amplified by PCR. In humans, male-specific sequences could be detected in the urine of females who had been transfused with male blood as well as in DNA isolated from urine of women pregnant with male fetuses. K-ras mutations were detected in the urine of patients with colon adenocarcinomas and pancreatic carcinomas. Conclusions: The data suggest that the kidney barrier in rodents and humans is permeable to DNA molecules large enough to be analyzed by standard genetic methodologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Liquid biopsies come of age: Towards implementation of circulating tumour DNA
Wan, J. C. M., Massie, C., Garcia-Corbacho, J., Mouliere, F., Brenton, J. D., Caldas, C., Pacey, S., Baird, R., & Rosenfeld, N. (2017) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2017.7 · Cited by 2,809
Integrating liquid biopsies into the management of cancer
Siravegna, G., Marsoni, S., Siena, S., & Bardelli, A. (2017) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.14 · Cited by 1,908
Circulating nucleic acids (CNAs) and cancer—A survey
Fleischhacker, M., & Schmidt, B. (2007) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2006.10.001 · Cited by 851
High‐mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein at the crossroads between innate and adaptive immunity
Bianchi, M. E., & Manfredi, A. A. (2007) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1600-065x.2007.00574.x · Cited by 600
The emerging role of cell-free DNA as a molecular marker for cancer management
Bronkhorst, A. J., Ungerer, V., & Holdenrieder, S. (2019) · Biomolecular Detection and Quantification · doi:10.1016/j.bdq.2019.100087 · Cited by 566
Metadata
- Authors
- Botezatu, I., Serdyuk, O., Potapova, G., Shelepov, V., Alechina, R., Molyaka, Y., Anan’ev, V., Bazin, I., Garin, A., Narimanov, M., Knysh, V., Melkonyan, H., Umansky, S., & Lichtenstein, A.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-08-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1078-1084
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2131641641
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic Analysis of DNA Excreted in Urine: A New Approach for Detecting Specific Genomic DNA Sequences from Cells Dying in an Organism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinchem/46.8.1078
- The paper
- Botezatu, I., Serdyuk, O., Potapova, G., Shelepov, V., Alechina, R., Molyaka, Y., Anan’ev, V., Bazin, I., Garin, A., Narimanov, M., Knysh, V., Melkonyan, H., Umansky, S., & Lichtenstein, A. (2000). Genetic Analysis of DNA Excreted in Urine: A New Approach for Detecting Specific Genomic DNA Sequences from Cells Dying in an Organism. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/46.8.1078
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.