The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Carcinoembryonic Antigen as a Marker for Colorectal Cancer: Is It Clinically Useful?
Abstract
Background: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is one of the most widely used tumor markers worldwide. Its main application is mostly in gastrointestinal cancers, especially in colorectal malignancy. Although in use for almost 30 years, the clinical value of CEA in colorectal cancer is still not clear. Methods: The literature relevant to the clinical value of CEA in colorectal cancer was reviewed. Particular attention was paid to studies involving metaanalyses and guidelines issued by Expert Panels. Results: Although of little use in detecting early colorectal cancer, high preoperative concentrations of CEA correlate with adverse prognosis. Serial CEA measurements can detect recurrent colorectal cancer with a sensitivity of ∼80%, a specificity of ∼70%, and can provide a lead time of ∼5 months. CEA is the most frequent indicator of recurrence in asymptomatic patients and currently is the most cost-effective test for the preclinical detection of resectable disease. CEA is most useful for the early detection of liver metastasis in patients with diagnosed colorectal cancer. Overall, however, little evidence is available that monitoring of all patients with diagnosed colorectal cancer leads to enhanced patient outcome or quality of life. Conclusions: Currently, the most useful application of CEA is in the detection of liver metastasis from colorectal cancers. Because of the relative success of surgery in resecting hepatic metastases, serial determinations of the marker are recommended for detecting cancer spread to the liver. In the future, preoperative concentrations of CEA may be included with the standard staging procedures for assessing prognosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Huang, Y.-Q., Liang, C.-H., He, L., Tian, J., Liang, C.-S., Chen, X., Ma, Z.-L., & Liu, Z.-Y. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.65.9128 · Cited by 1,765
Protein Glycosylation in Cancer
Stowell, S. R., Ju, T., & Cummings, R. D. (2015) · Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-012414-040438 · Cited by 873
Proteogenomic Analysis of Human Colon Cancer Reveals New Therapeutic Opportunities
Vasaikar, S., Huang, C., Wang, X., Petyuk, V. A., Savage, S. R., Wen, B., Dou, Y., Zhang, Y., Shi, Z., Arshad, O. A., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.030 · Cited by 799
Carcinoembryonic Antigen in the Staging and Follow-up of Patients with Colorectal Cancer
Goldstein, M. J., & Mitchell, E. P. (2005) · Cancer Investigation · doi:10.1081/cnv-58878 · Cited by 419
Circulating tumor DNA: a promising biomarker in the liquid biopsy of cancer
Cheng, F., Su, L., & Qian, C. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.9453 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Duffy, M. J.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-04-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 624-630
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2144692208
- Cited by
- 794
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carcinoembryonic Antigen as a Marker for Colorectal Cancer: Is It Clinically Useful? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinchem/47.4.624
- The paper
- Duffy, M. J. (2001). Carcinoembryonic Antigen as a Marker for Colorectal Cancer: Is It Clinically Useful? Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/47.4.624
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.