The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carcinoembryonic Antigen in the Staging and Follow-up of Patients with Colorectal Cancer
Abstract
CEA is a complex glycoprotein produced by 90% of colorectal cancers and contributes to the malignant characteristics of a tumor. It can be measured in serum quantitatively, and its level in plasma can be useful as a marker of disease. Because of its lack of sensitivity in the early stages of colorectal cancer, CEA measurement is an unsuitable modality for population screening. An elevated preoperative CEA is a poor prognostic sign and correlates with reduced overall survival after surgical resection of colorectal carcinoma. A failure of the CEA to return to normal levels after surgical resection is indicative of inadequate resection of occult systemic disease. Frequent monitoring of CEA postoperatively may allow identification of patients with metastatic disease for whom surgical resection or other localized therapy might be potentially beneficial. To identify this group, serial CEA measurement appears to be more effective than clinical evaluation or any other diagnostic modality, although its sensitivity for detecting recurrent disease is not as high for locoregional or pulmonary metastases as it is for liver metastases. Several studies have shown that a small percentage of patients followed postoperatively with CEA monitoring and who undergo CEA-directed salvage surgery for metastatic disease will be alive and disease-free 5 years after surgery. Furthermore, CEA levels after salvage surgery do appear to predict survival in patients undergoing resection of liver or pulmonary metastases. However, several authors argue that CEA surveillance is not cost-effective in terms of lives saved. In support of this argument, there is no clear difference in survival after resection of metastatic disease with curative intent between patients in whom the second-look surgery was performed on the basis of elevated CEA levels and those with other laboratory or imaging abnormalities. There is also no clear consensus on the frequency or duration of CEA monitoring, although the ASCO guidelines currently recommend every 2-3 months for at least 2 years after diagnosis. In the follow-up of patients undergoing palliative therapy, the CEA level correlates well with response, and CEA is indicative of not only response but may also identify patients with stable disease for whom there is also a demonstrated benefit in survival and symptom relief with combination chemotherapy. More recently, scintigraphic imaging after administration of radiolabeled antibodies afforded an important radionuclide technique that adds clinically significant information in assessing the extent and location of disease in patients with colorectal cancer above and beyond or complementary to conventional imaging modalities. Immunotherapy based on CEA is a rapidly advancing area of clinical research demonstrating antibody and T-cell responses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology
Gunn, W. G. (1994) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03510350091047 · Cited by 1,791
Prognostic Factors in Prostate Cancer: College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999
Bostwick, D. G., Grignon, D. J., Hammond, M. E. H., Amin, M. B., Cohen, M., Crawford, D., Gospadarowicz, M., Kaplan, R. S., Miller, D. S., Montironi, R., et al. (2000) · Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.5858/2000-124-0995-pfipc · Cited by 1,239
Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Cancer: College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999
Compton, C. C., Fielding, L. P., Burgart, L. J., Conley, B., Cooper, H. S., Hamilton, S. R., Hammond, M. E. H., Henson, D. E., Hutter, R. V. P., Nagle, R. B., et al. (2000) · Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.5858/2000-124-0979-pficc · Cited by 1,230
Carcinoembryonic antigen, a human tumor marker, functions as an intercellular adhesion molecule
Benchimol, S., Fuks, A., Jothy, S., Beauchemin, N., Shirota, K., & Stanners, C. P. (1989) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(89)90970-7 · Cited by 974
Hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma: Impact of surgical resection on the natural history
Scheele, J., Stangl, R., & Altendorf-Hofmann, A. (1990) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800771115 · Cited by 836
Carcinoembryonic Antigen as a Marker for Colorectal Cancer: Is It Clinically Useful?
Duffy, M. J. (2001) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/47.4.624 · Cited by 794
Factors influencing the natural history of colorectal liver metastases
Stangl, R., Altendorf-Hofmann, A., Charnley, R. M., & Scheele, J. (1994) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92529-1 · Cited by 722
FLETCHER, R. H. (1986) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-104-1-66 · Cited by 473
Preoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level as a Prognostic Indicator in Colorectal Cancer
Wanebo, H. J., Rao, B., Pinsky, C. M., Hoffman, R. G., Stearns, M., Schwartz, M. K., & Oettgen, H. F. (1978) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197808312990904 · Cited by 468
Moertel, C. G. (1993) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03510080047030 · Cited by 449
Cited by
Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics
Diehl, F., Schmidt, K., Choti, M. A., Romans, K., Goodman, S., Li, M., Thornton, K., Agrawal, N., Sokoll, L., Szabo, S. A., et al. (2008) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.1789 · Cited by 2,734
Glycosylation: mechanisms, biological functions and clinical implications
He, M., Zhou, X., & Wang, X. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01886-1 · Cited by 499
Duffy, M. J., Lamerz, R., Haglund, C., Nicolini, A., Kalousová, M., Holubec, L., & Sturgeon, C. (2014) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.28384 · Cited by 360
Wiśniewski, J. R., Ostasiewicz, P., & Mann, M. (2011) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr200019m · Cited by 290
Klein, C., Waldhauer, I., Nicolini, V. G., Freimoser-Grundschober, A., Nayak, T., Vugts, D. J., Dunn, C., Bolijn, M., Benz, J., Stihle, M., et al. (2017) · OncoImmunology · doi:10.1080/2162402x.2016.1277306 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldstein, M. J., & Mitchell, E. P.
- Venue
- Cancer Investigation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 338-351
- ISSN
- 0735-7907 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-4192
- OpenAlex
- W2083876596
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 5.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carcinoembryonic Antigen in the Staging and Follow-up of Patients with Colorectal Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1081/cnv-58878
- The paper
- Goldstein, M. J., & Mitchell, E. P. (2005). Carcinoembryonic Antigen in the Staging and Follow-up of Patients with Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1081/cnv-58878
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.