The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The History and Future of the Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorter and Flow Cytometry: A View from Stanford
Abstract
The Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorter (FACS) was invented in the late 1960s by Bonner, Sweet, Hulett, Herzenberg, and others to do flow cytometry and cell sorting of viable cells. Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems introduced the commercial machines in the early 1970s, using the Stanford patent and expertise supplied by the Herzenberg Laboratory and a Becton Dickinson engineering group under Bernie Shoor. Over the years, we have increased the number of measured FACS dimensions (parameters) and the speed of sorting to where we now simultaneously measure 12 fluorescent colors plus 2 scatter parameters. In this history, I illustrate the great utility of this state-of-the-art instrument, which allows us to simultaneously stain, analyze, and then sort cells from small samples of human blood cells from AIDS patients, infants, stem cell transplant patients, and others. I also illustrate analysis and sorting of multiple subpopulations of lymphocytes by use of 8–12 colors. In addition, I review single cell sorting used to clone and analyze hybridomas and discuss other applications of FACS developed over the past 30 years, as well as give our ideas on the future of FACS. These ideas are currently being implemented in new programs using the internet for data storage and analysis as well as developing new fluorochromes, e.g., green fluorescent protein and tandem dyes, with applications in such areas as apoptosis, gene expression, cytokine expression, cell biochemistry, redox regulation, and AIDS. Finally, I describe new FACS methods for measuring activated kinases and phosphatases and redox active enzymes in individual cells simultaneously with cell surface phenotyping. Thus, key functions can be studied in various subsets of cells without the need for prior sorting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Seventeen-colour flow cytometry: unravelling the immune system
Perfetto, S. P., Chattopadhyay, P. K., & Roederer, M. (2004) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1416 · Cited by 1,019
Self-citationSingle-cell analysis tools for drug discovery and development
Heath, J. R., Ribas, A., & Mischel, P. S. (2016) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2015.16 · Cited by 473
Leukaemia stem cells and the evolution of cancer-stem-cell research
Huntly, B. J. P., & Gilliland, D. G. (2005) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1592 · Cited by 483
Interpreting flow cytometry data: a guide for the perplexed
Herzenberg, L. A., Tung, J., Moore, W. A., Herzenberg, L. A., & Parks, D. R. (2006) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni0706-681 · Cited by 464
Self-citationLongevity of T-Cell Memory following Acute Viral Infection
Walker, J. M., & Slifka, M. K. (2010) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6451-9_8 · Cited by 30
Review of flow cytometry as a tool for cell and gene therapy
Lazarski, C. A., & Hanley, P. J. (2024) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2023.10.005 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Herzenberg, L. A., Parks, D., Sahaf, B., Perez, O., Roederer, M., & Herzenberg, L. A.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-10-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1819-1827
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2102649152
- Cited by
- 602
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.