Cited by 76Malaria Research and ControlGlobal Maternal and Child HealthHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders

Malaria During Pregnancy: Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality and the Efficacy of Chloroquine Chemoprophylaxis

Nyirjesy, P., Kavasya, T., Axelrod, P., Fischer, P. R.·1993·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

In malaria-endemic regions, the impact of malaria upon pregnancy and the value of chemoprophylaxis for malaria for pregnant women remain controversial. We prospectively studied 302 pregnant women who presented in labor to Centre Médical Evangélique, Nyankunde, Zaire. We evaluated the incidence of malarial infection in mothers, placentas, and neonates and examined the effect of infection on birth weight and perinatal mortality. We analyzed the outcome of pregnancy in relation to prophylaxis with chloroquine, controlling for parity and prenatal clinic attendance. Peripartum smears of maternal blood (21%), placentas (33%), cord blood (9%), and neonatal blood (7%) were positive for Plasmodium falciparum. Maternal malaria increased the risk of perinatal death (relative risk [RR] = 12.4) and low birth weight (RR = 3.7). Neonatal malaria increased the risk of perinatal death (RR = 7.2). Chloroquine prophylaxis protected against maternal (RR = 0.4) and fetal malaria (RR = 0.2), low birth weight (RR = 0.39), and perinatal death (RR = 0.38). Peripartum malaria increases the risk of perinatal death and low birth weight. Chemoprophylaxis with chloroquine during pregnancy may have a protective effect, even in certain areas where chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum is endemic.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/clinids/16.1.127

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar to placental blood smear, placental histology is more sensitive than peripheral blood smear for detecting pregnancy malaria.

    “Similar to placental BS, placental histology is more sensitive than peripheral BS for detecting PM (33 vs 21%, respectively, and 52.5 vs 17.4%, respectively) [67,68].”

    From Diagnosing malaria in pregnancy: An update (2012) · cites this paper as [67]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nyirjesy, P., Kavasya, T., Axelrod, P., & Fischer, P. R.
Affiliations
Mubende Hospital (UG)
Corresponding author
Nyirjesy, P.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
1993-01-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
127-132
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2136293929
Cited by
76
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Keywords
malaria in pregnancy, neonatal malaria, perinatal mortality, low birth weight, chloroquine prophylaxis, Plasmodium falciparum, maternal malaria, placental malaria, malaria chemoprophylaxis, chloroquine resistance
MeSH terms
Birth Weight, Chloroquine, Drug Resistance, Female, Fetal Death, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic, Malaria, Falciparum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review