The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Normal Vaginal Flora, H2O2-Producing Lactobacilli, and Bacterial Vaginosis in Pregnant Women
Abstract
In this study of the vaginal flora of 171 pregnant women in labor at term, the flora was categorized as normal (Lactobacillus predominant), intermediate, or representative of bacterial vaginosis (BV) on the basis of a vaginal smear. BV was diagnosed in 39 women (23%); the vaginal flora was classified as normal in 50% of cases and as intermediate in 27%. H2O2-producing lactobacilli were recovered from 5% of women with BV, 37% of those with an intermediate flora, and 61% of those with a normal flora. H2O2-negative lactobacilli were equally frequent (57%-65%) in all three groups. The microorganisms most frequently recovered from women with BV included Gardnerella vaginalis, Prevotella bivia/disiens, Bacteroides ureolyticus, Prevotella corporis/Bacteroides levii, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Mobiluncus species, Peptostreptococcus prevotii, Peptostreptococcus tetradius, Peptostreptococcus anaerobius, viridans streptococci, Ureaplasma urealyticum, and Mycoplasma hominis (P < .05 for each). The presence of all but three of these organisms was inversely related to vaginal colonization by H2O2-producing lactobacilli; the exceptions were B. ureolyticus, F. nucleatum, and P. prevotii. Other microorganisms were equally frequent among women with and without BV. We conclude that specific groups of anaerobes are associated with BV in this population and that a strong association exists between species associated with BV and those inhibited by H2O2-producing lactobacilli.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
(1959) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/22.4.719 · Cited by 14,689
Cited by
Association between Bacterial Vaginosis and Preterm Delivery of a Low-Birth-Weight Infant
Hillier, S. L., Nugent, R. P., Eschenbach, D. A., Krohn, M. A., Gibbs, R. S., Martin, D. H., Cotch, M. F., Edelman, R., Pastorek, J. G., Rao, A. V., et al. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199512283332604 · Cited by 1,492
Self-citationRomero, R., Hassan, S. S., Gajer, P., Tarca, A. L., Fadrosh, D. W., Nikita, L., Galuppi, M., Lamont, R. F., Chaemsaithong, P., Miranda, J., et al. (2014) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/2049-2618-2-4 · Cited by 852
The Genera Lactobacillus and Carnobacterium
(2011) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_3731 · Cited by 382
Kindinger, L. M., Bennett, P. R., Lee, Y. S., Marchesi, J. R., Smith, A., Cacciatore, S., Holmes, E., Nicholson, J. K., Teoh, T. G., & MacIntyre, D. A. (2017) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-016-0223-9 · Cited by 372
Boskey, E. R., Telsch, K. M., Whaley, K. J., Moench, T. R., & Cone, R. A. (1999) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.67.10.5170-5175.1999 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Hillier, S. L., Krohn, M. A., Rabe, L. K., Klebanoff, S. J., & Eschenbach, D. A.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-06-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- Supplement_4
- Pages
- S273-S281
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2004783933
- Cited by
- 479
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Normal Vaginal Flora, H2O2-Producing Lactobacilli, and Bacterial Vaginosis in Pregnant Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinids/16.supplement_4.s273
- The paper
- Hillier, S. L., Krohn, M. A., Rabe, L. K., Klebanoff, S. J., & Eschenbach, D. A. (1993). The Normal Vaginal Flora, H2O2-Producing Lactobacilli, and Bacterial Vaginosis in Pregnant Women. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/16.supplement_4.s273
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.