Cited by 626Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Expanding our conceptualization of and treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: integrating mindfulness/acceptance-based approaches with existing cognitive-behavioral models

Roemer, Lizabeth, Orsillo, Susan M.·2002·Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

Abstract

Generalized anxiety disorder (CAD) is a chronic, pervasive disorder for which we have yet to develop sufficiently efficacious interventions. In this article we propose that recent research and theory regarding this disorder supports the integration of acceptance-based treatments with existing cognitive-behavioral treatments for CAD to improve the efficacy and clinical significance of such approaches. The bases for this proposal (from both the CAD and the acceptance-based treatment literature) are reviewed, and a new treatment stemming from this conceptual integration is described.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/clipsy.9.1.54

Cites

108 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 104 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. American Psychiatric Association, 1980, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
  2. Borkovec, 1999, June, The nature andpsychosocial treatment of generalized anxiety disorder
  3. Craske, 1992, Mastery of your anxiety and worry
  4. Follette, 1994, Acceptance and change: Content and context in psychotherapy, 255
  5. Greenberg, 1987, Emotions in psychotherapy
  6. Hayes, 1999, Buddhist philosophy and CBT
  7. 1994, Acceptance and change: Content and context in psychotherapy
  8. Heffner, 2000, The effects of acceptance and control contexts on avoidance of an aversive event
  9. Linehan, 1994, Acceptance and change: Content and context in psychotherapy, 73
  10. Marlatt, 1994, Acceptance and change: Content and context in psychotherapy, 175
  11. Wells, 1999, A metacognitive model and therapy for generalized anxiety disorder, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 6, 86, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0879(199905)6:2<86::AID-CPP189>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–626 of 626

Metadata

Authors
Roemer, L., & Orsillo, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Venue
Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
Published
2002
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
54-68
ISSN
  • 0969-5893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2850
OpenAlex
W2098474483
Cited by
621
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 26
FWCI
28.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, mindfulness-based interventions, acceptance and commitment therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment integration, conceptual blending, treatment efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review