Cited by 85Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The role of values-consistent behavior in generalized anxiety disorder.

Open access
Michelson, Susan E., Lee, Jonathan K., Orsillo, Susan M., Roemer, Lizabeth·2011·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

Background: Theory and research suggest that generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is associated with diminished quality of life and restriction in valued action. The purpose of this study was to examine the relevance of values-consistent behavior (valued action) in understanding the impairment in quality of life in GAD.Method: Treatment-seeking clients with a principal diagnosis of GAD (n = 30) were compared with demographically matched nonanxious controls (n = 30) using self-report measures.Results: Participants with GAD reported significantly less valued action compared with controls, and within the GAD group, diminished valued action was not fully explained by depression comorbidity. Valued action was significantly correlated with measures of experiential avoidance, distress about emotions, and quality of life. Further, consistent with a theoretical model of GAD, restrictions in valued action contributed unique variance to diminished quality of life over and above the contributions of gender, GAD severity, experiential avoidance, distress about emotions, and depression comorbidity. Finally, an acceptance-based behavioral therapy significantly improved self-reports of valued action for GAD clients with 40% achieving clinically significant change in this domain.Conclusion: The findings provide preliminary support for the relevance of valued action in understanding the functional impairment associated with GAD, and the beneficial effects of an acceptance-based behavior therapy in increasing valued action.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.20793

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

4 of 28 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation

    Preliminary studies support ABBT's potential efficacy.

    “Although preliminary studies support the potential efficacy of ABBT,[23, 24] research aimed at investigating each component of the model is needed to inform future treatment development and refinement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [23] source
    • cites [24] source
  • Premisecitation

    GAD is associated with diminished quality of life.

    “These findings contribute to the literature demonstrating the significant impairments in quality of life reported by those with GAD.[9, 11, 12,14, 42]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [9] source
    • cites [11] source
    • cites [12] source
  • Findingown data

    Forty percent of GAD participants (n=12) achieved clinically significant change on the VLQ.

    “40 percent of the participants (n = 12) achieved clinically significant change, or can be considered recovered and within the distribution of the non-GAD group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In a replication that controlled for depression comorbidity, valued action explained an additional 7% of the variance in quality of life beyond gender, GAD severity, depression comorbidity, distress about emotions, and experiential avoidance.

    “valued action contributed 7% of the variance over and above the shared variance of gender, GAD severity, depression comorbidity, distress about emotions, and experiential avoidance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In that regression, depression comorbidity did not significantly predict quality of life.

    “comorbidity status was not a significant predictor (β = −.16, r2 = −.14)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 8
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 4
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    People with GAD report lower life satisfaction than non-anxious controls, with particular deficits in areas such as self-esteem, values, finances, work, recreation, learning, creativity, social relationships, and family.

    “Individuals with GAD report significantly less satisfaction with their quality of life relative to non-anxious controls[11] particularly in the domains of self-esteem, goals and values, money, work, play, learning, creativity, friends and relatives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Treatment-seeking GAD patients report greater distress about emotions, emotion regulation difficulties, experiential avoidance, and lower mindfulness than people without GAD.

    “Further, treatment-seeking patients with GAD report significantly more distress about emotions,[29, 31] difficulties with emotion regulation,[16, 29] and experiential avoidance,[31] as well as diminished levels of mindfulness[16] than do individuals without GAD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [29] source
    • cites [31] source
    • cites [16] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Within the GAD group, men reported more impaired valued action and quality of life, and more distress about emotions and worry severity, than women.

    “In the GAD group, men reported more impairment in valued action and quality of life, and greater distress about emotions and worry severity compared with women (see Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Valued action was negatively correlated with distress about emotions, but this association weakened when gender was controlled.

    “However, the relationship between valued action and distress about emotions was attenuated when controlling for gender (see Table 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Distress about emotions, emotion regulation difficulties, and experiential avoidance each contribute unique variance to GAD severity.

    “For example, distress about emotions, particularly anxiety and depression,[29, 30] difficulties with emotion regulation,[29] and experiential avoidance[30] have been shown to contribute unique variance to GAD severity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [29] source
    • cites [30] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Anxiety severity is significantly associated with health-related quality of life in a primary care GAD sample.

    “Finally, a significant association was found between anxiety severity and health related quality of life in a primary care sample of GAD patients.[14]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Roemer and Orsillo advanced a three-part GAD model that could account for the life dissatisfaction and impairment linked to the disorder.

    “Roemer and Orsillo[15, 16] propose a three-part model of GAD that may explain the life dissatisfaction and impairment associated with this disorder.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [15] source
    • cites [16] source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    People with GAD relate to their internal experiences in a way described as fused, critical, and judgmental.

    “The first part of the theory (drawing from a larger theory of psychopathology proposed by Hayes and colleagues [17]) asserts that individuals with GAD have a particular relationship with their internal experiences that is characterized as “fused, critical, and judgmental”.[18]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In one treatment-seeking GAD sample, 95% scored below community norms on the Q-LES-Q-SF.

    “Pollack and colleagues[12] found that 95% of a treatment-seeking sample of individuals with GAD scored below community-based norms on the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF[13]).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Men who seek GAD treatment may have more severe symptoms and greater life interference.

    “It may be that men who do seek treatment for their GAD are those who have experienced more intense symptoms and greater life interference.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The study gives preliminary partial support for the theory that GAD's impaired quality of life partly stems from reduced valued activity, possibly driven by a judgmental stance toward internal events and experiential avoidance, and that ABBT can increase values-consistent behavior.

    “In summary, the current study provides preliminary partial support for the theory that the impaired quality of life characteristic of GAD is at least in part a product of diminished valued activity that may be driven by a judgmental stance towards internal events and experiential avoidance and that an acceptance-based behavioral therapy can increase values-consistent behavior.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Using self-report methods may limit measure validity and raise response-bias concerns.

    “Reliance on self-report methodology to assess values-consistent behavior, experiential avoidance, distress about emotions, worry severity, and quality of life potentially limits the validity of the measures and raises concerns about response bias.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
12 of 12
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Values articulation and the intrinsic reinforcement from valued action motivate clients to do painful therapy work.

    “Values articulation and the intrinsically reinforcing properties of valued action are assumed to motivate clients to engage in often painful and difficult work of therapy.”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People with generalized anxiety disorder are less likely to consistently engage in behaviors that are important to them.

    “Individuals with GAD are less likely to consistently engage in behaviors that are important to them (i.e., valued actions) and as a result experience a diminished quality of life (Michelson, Lee, Orsillo, & Roemer, 2011).”

    From A randomized clinical trial comparing an acceptance-based behavior therapy to applied relaxation for generalized anxiety disorder (2013) · cites this paper as Michelson et al., 2011

    The Discussion reports that participants with GAD were less likely than matched non-anxious participants to describe themselves as living consistently with their values. It also links valued action to quality of life, but calls the proposed causal explanation—that diminished valued activity produces impaired quality of life—preliminary and only partially supported. The citing sentence presents that explanation as established fact. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous studies have indicated that valued living can improve following Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in non-acquired-brain-injury populations.

    “Previous studies have indicated that valued living can improve following ACT in non-ABI populations (Michelson et al., 2011;Wersebe et al., 2017).”

    From A single-case experimental evaluation of a new group-based intervention to enhance adjustment to life with acquired brain injury: VaLiANT (valued living after neurological trauma) (2022) · cites this paper as Michelson et al., 2011

    The Results report improved valued action after treatment in clients with generalized anxiety disorder, a non-ABI population. But the Method (Procedure) identifies the treatment as acceptance-based behavioral therapy (ABBT), not Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), so this paper does not establish the ACT-specific part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The VLQ has been used to measure valued living in a range of clinical populations including anxiety, chronic pain, depression and TBI.

    “The VLQ has been used to measure valued living in a range of clinical populations including anxiety, chronic pain, depression and TBI.66 67”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy for mild traumatic brain injury (ACTion-mTBI): a quasiexperimental feasibility study (2025) · cites this paper as [67]

    The Method > Measures section describes the VLQ as a measure of valued living, and the Results > The Relevance of Valued Action in GAD section uses it with people diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder, including some with comorbid mood disorders. These passages do not establish its use in chronic pain or TBI populations, or in a separate depression population. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interventions focused on the work of personal values demonstrated improved quality of life.

    “and quality of life (McCracken, 2013; Michelson et al., 2011).”

    From Psychological variables implied in the therapeutic effect of ayahuasca: A contextual approach (2018) · cites this paper as Michelson et al., 2011

    The Discussion (page unavailable) refers to pre- to post-treatment improvements in quality of life and reports that treated participants with GAD increased their values-consistent behavior. It also says the study cannot establish whether valued action led to the quality-of-life improvement; symptom reduction could have led to both. The source therefore supports improvement during treatment, but not the implication that work on personal values produced it. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • People with generalized anxiety disorder experience diminished quality of life.

    “Individuals with GAD are less likely to consistently engage in behaviors that are important to them (i.e., valued actions) and as a result experience a diminished quality of life (Michelson, Lee, Orsillo, & Roemer, 2011).”

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Not confirmedF(1, 56) = 4.21reported p = .05 · recomputed p = .045

    “F (1, 56)=4.21, p = .05”

  • ConsistentF(1, 34) = 0.1reported p = .76 · recomputed p = .754

    “F(1,34)=.10, p = .76”

  • ConsistentF(1, 56) = 12.32reported p = .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(1, 56)=12.32, p = .001”

  • Consistentt(28) = -3reported p = .006 · recomputed p = .006

    “t(28) = −3.0, p = .006”

  • Consistentt(28) = 0.21reported p = .84 · recomputed p = .835

    “t(28) = .21, p = .84”

  • ConsistentF(1, 26) = 10.52reported p = .003 · recomputed p = .003

    “F(1, 26)=10.52, p = .003”

  • ConsistentF(1, 26) = 1.68reported p = .21 · recomputed p = .206

    “F(1, 26)=1.68, p = .21”

  • ConsistentF(1, 28) = 0.32reported p = .58 · recomputed p = .576

    “F (1,28)=.32, p = .58”

  • ConsistentF(1, 28) = 14.77reported p = .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(1,28)=14.77, p = .001”

  • ConsistentF(1, 56) = 4.55reported p = .04 · recomputed p = .037

    “F (1,56)=4.55, p = .04”

10 of 10

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

  • The AAQ minimum score is too low for nine items

    Minor

    The paper says the AAQ total sums nine responses, each scored at least 1. Its minimum possible total is therefore 9, not 7.

    Reported 7 · recomputed 9

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Yadavia, 2009, Values in acceptance and commitment therapy. a comparison with four other approaches, Hellenic J Psychol, 6, 244
  2. Borkovec, 2004, Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Advances in Research and Practice, 77
  3. Di Nardo, 1994, Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV: Lifetime version

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michelson, S. E., Lee, J. K., Orsillo, S. M., & Roemer, L.
Affiliations
  • Suffolk University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Corresponding author
Michelson, Susan E.
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Published
2011-02-09
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
358-366
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018993810
Cited by
84
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH63208, R01MH074589, R21MH063208)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, valued action, quality of life, experiential avoidance, emotional distress, comorbid depression, functional disability
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Anxiety Disorders, Awareness, Behavior Therapy, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Personality Inventory, Quality of Life, Social Values, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review