The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Survey of Outlier Detection Methods in Network Anomaly Identification
Abstract
The detection of outliers has gained considerable interest in data mining with the realization that outliers can be the key discovery to be made from very large databases. Outliers arise due to various reasons such as mechanical faults, changes in system behavior, fraudulent behavior, human error and instrument error. Indeed, for many applications the discovery of outliers leads to more interesting and useful results than the discovery of inliers. Detection of outliers can lead to identification of system faults so that administrators can take preventive measures before they escalate. It is possible that anomaly detection may enable detection of new attacks. Outlier detection is an important anomaly detection approach. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of well-known distance-based, density-based and other techniques for outlier detection and compare them. We provide definitions of outliers and discuss their detection based on supervised and unsupervised learning in the context of network anomaly detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LOF: identifying density-based local outliers
Breunig, M. M., Kriegel, H.-P., Ng, R. T., & Sander, J. (2000) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/335191.335388 · Cited by 5,207
Hawkins, D. M. (1980) · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-3994-4 · Cited by 2,982
Toward Credible Evaluation of Anomaly-Based Intrusion-Detection Methods
Tavallaee, M., Stakhanova, N., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2010.2048428 · Cited by 280
Cited by
Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Systematic Review
Nassif, A. B., Talib, M. A., Nasir, Q., & Dakalbab, F. M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3083060 · Cited by 748
Progress in Outlier Detection Techniques: A Survey
Wang, H., Bah, M. J., & Hammad, M. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2932769 · Cited by 523
Outlier Detection: Methods, Models, and Classification
Boukerche, A., Zheng, L., & Alfandi, O. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3381028 · Cited by 334
Machine learning based approach to exam cheating detection
Kamalov, F., Sulieman, H., & Santandreu Calonge, D. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0254340 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Gogoi, P., Bhattacharyya, D. K., Borah, B., & Kalita, J. K.
- Venue
- The Computer Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-03-20
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 570-588
- ISSN
- 0010-4620 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2067
- OpenAlex
- W2105642232
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey of Outlier Detection Methods in Network Anomaly Identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/comjnl/bxr026
- The paper
- Gogoi, P., Bhattacharyya, D. K., Borah, B., & Kalita, J. K. (2011). A Survey of Outlier Detection Methods in Network Anomaly Identification. The Computer Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxr026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.