Cited by 200Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionWorkplace Violence and BullyingChild Abuse and Trauma

A qualitative study of bullying from multiple perspectives

Mishna, F.·2004·Children & Schools

Abstract

This article describes a pilot study using qualitative methods to investigate bullying from the perspectives of the victimized children, their parents, and educators. Interviews were conducted with children in grades 4 and 5 who self-identified as victims, one parent, each child's teacher, and school administrators. Two major themes emerged: difficulty determining whether an incident is bullying; and bullying among friends. Implications for practice are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cs/26.4.234

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mishna, F.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Mishna, F.
Venue
Children & Schools
Published
2004-10-01
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
234-247
ISSN
  • 0162-7961 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-8759
  • 1545-682X
OpenAlex
W2060724774
Cited by
199
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Children & Schools (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
bullying, bullying victims, children's perspectives, parental attitudes, teacher perceptions, school administrators, elementary school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review