The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Non-invasive continuous finger blood pressure measurement during orthostatic stress compared to intra-arterial pressure
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether invasive blood pressure responses to orthostatic stress can be replaced by non-invasive continuous finger blood pressure responses. DESIGN - Intrabrachial and Finapres blood pressures were simultaneously measured during passive head up tilt and during active standing from the supine or sitting position in healthy volunteers. SUBJECTS: Subjects (n = 11) were healthy males aged 22-40 years, mean age 30 years. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Beat to beat values of systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures were calculated for both methods of measurement and the differences compared during a 30 s control period before, and during the first 120 s after, the change of posture. In the control period the difference between finger pressure and intra-arterial pressure was +2 (SD11) mm Hg for systolic, -4(8) mm Hg for mean, and -3(7) mm Hg for diastolic pressure. Compared to these control differences, the average finger minus intra-arterial pressure differences for mean and diastolic pressures during the three orthostatic manoeuvres were always within the range -6 to +6 mm Hg. The average systolic deviations were larger, ranging from -10 to +11 mm Hg. Despite these differences the characteristic changes in intra-arterial pressure during the initial phase (first 30 s after change of posture), as well as during the early steady state phase (1-2 min after the change of posture) were well reflected by finger pressure measurements in all subjects. CONCLUSIONS: For the assessment of the continuous blood pressure responses to orthostatic stress similar information can be obtained with non-invasive Finapres blood pressure recordings as with invasive recordings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vinik, A. I., Maser, R. E., Mitchell, B. D., & Freeman, R. (2003) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.5.1553 · Cited by 2,044
Initial orthostatic hypotension: review of a forgotten condition
Wieling, W., Krediet, C. T. P., van Dijk, N., Linzer, M., & Tschakovsky, M. E. (2007) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs20060091 · Cited by 374
Self-citationThe Role of Rumination in Recovery from Reactivity: Cardiovascular Consequences of Emotional States
Glynn, L. M. (2002) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000031574.42041.23 · Cited by 294
Midodrine: a role in the management of neurocardiogenic syncope
Ward, C. R., Gray, J. C., Gilroy, J. J., & Kenny, R. A. (1998) · Heart · doi:10.1136/hrt.79.1.45 · Cited by 249
McIntosh, S. J., Lawson, J., & Kenny, R. A. (1993) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/0002-9343(93)90261-m · Cited by 238
Metadata
- Authors
- Imholz, B. P. M., Settels, J. J., van der Meiracker, A. H., Wesseling, K. H., & Wieling, W.
- Venue
- Cardiovascular Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-03-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 214-221
- ISSN
- 0008-6363 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090528555
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non-invasive continuous finger blood pressure measurement during orthostatic stress compared to intra-arterial pressure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cvr/24.3.214
- The paper
- Imholz, B. P. M., Settels, J. J., van der Meiracker, A. H., Wesseling, K. H., & Wieling, W. (1990). Non-invasive continuous finger blood pressure measurement during orthostatic stress compared to intra-arterial pressure. Cardiovascular Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/24.3.214
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.