Cited by 294Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiac Health and Mental Health

The Role of Rumination in Recovery from Reactivity: Cardiovascular Consequences of Emotional States

Glynn, L. M.·2002·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

Objective While most investigations of the link between blood pressure responses and later disease have focused on acute reactivity during stressful tasks, there is some theoretical and empirical reason to believe that examining recovery and later re-creations of BP responses may also be useful. Two experiments explored situational determinants of sustained BP elevations, examining whether the extent of recovery and the ability to later mentally recreate the response are influenced by the magnitude or emotionality of the initial task and also whether preventing rumination after a stressor has ended speeds recovery. Method Experiment 1, with 72 normotensive male and female undergraduates, examined BP and heart rate before, during, and after a task and also before, during, and after the mental re-creation of that task. Four tasks were used, designed to produce high initial reactivity with an emotional component (mental arithmetic with harassment), low reactivity with emotion (shock avoidance), high reactivity without emotion (physical exercise), or low reactivity without emotion (cold pressor). Experiment 2, with 20 normotensive male and female undergraduates, compared the cardiovascular recovery of persons who were either given a distractor task or just sat quietly immediately after a mental arithmetic task. Results Study 1 revealed that only the emotional tasks were associated with delayed BP recovery and elevations during later rumination. Blood pressure during recovery and…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.psy.0000031574.42041.23

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glynn, L. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Glynn, L. M.
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2002-09-01
Volume
64
Issue
5
Pages
714-726
ISSN
  • 0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-7796
OpenAlex
W2040404653
Cited by
294
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 17
FWCI
5.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
rumination, blood pressure recovery, cardiovascular reactivity, emotional stress, heart rate, distractor task, mental arithmetic, shock avoidance, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Emotions, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Random Allocation, Reaction Time, Stress, Psychological, Exercise, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review