Peptipedia v2.0: a peptide sequence database and user-friendly web platform. A major update
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
In recent years, peptides have gained significant relevance due to their therapeutic properties. The surge in peptide production and synthesis has generated vast amounts of data, enabling the creation of comprehensive databases and information repositories. Advances in sequencing techniques and artificial intelligence have further accelerated the design of tailor-made peptides. However, leveraging these techniques requires versatile and continuously updated storage systems, along with tools that facilitate peptide research and the implementation of machine learning for predictive systems. This work introduces Peptipedia v2.0, one of the most comprehensive public repositories of peptides, supporting biotechnological research by simplifying peptide study and annotation. Peptipedia v2.0 has expanded its collection by over 45% with peptide sequences that have reported biological activities. The functional biological activity tree has been revised and enhanced, incorporating new categories such as cosmetic and dermatological activities, molecular binding, and antiageing properties. Utilizing protein language models and machine learning, more than 90 binary classification models have been trained, validated, and incorporated into Peptipedia v2.0. These models exhibit average sensitivities and specificities of 0.877±0.0530 and 0.873±0.054, respectively, facilitating the annotation of more than 3.6 million peptide sequences with unknown biological activities, also registered in Peptipedia v2.0. Additionally, Peptipedia v2.0 introduces description tools based on structural and ontological properties and user-friendly machine learning tools to facilitate the application of machine learning strategies to study peptide sequences. Database URL: https://peptipedia.cl/
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2023
The UniProt Consortium, Bateman, A., Martin, M.-J., Orchard, S., Magrane, M., Ahmad, S., Alpi, E., Bowler-Barnett, E. H., Britto, R., Bye-A-Jee, H., et al. (2023) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1052 · Cited by 7,210 · see citing works
Therapeutic peptides: Historical perspectives, current development trends, and future directions
Lau, J. L., & Dunn, M. K. (2018) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2017.06.052 · Cited by 1,879 · see citing works
100 years of insulin: celebrating the past, present and future of diabetes therapy
Sims, E. K., Carr, A. L. J., Oram, R. A., DiMeglio, L. A., & Evans-Molina, C. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01418-2 · Cited by 270 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The therapeutic market started 100 years ago using insulin to treat type 1 diabetes [8, 9].”
Lien, S., & Lowman, H. B. (2003) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2003.10.005 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Cabas-Mora, G., Daza, A., Soto-García, N., Garrido, V., Alvarez, D., Navarrete, M., Sarmiento-Varón, L., Sepúlveda Yañez, J. H., Davari, M. D., Cadet, F., Olivera-Nappa, Á., Uribe-Paredes, R., & Medina-Ortiz, D.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Magallanes (CL)
- Centre for Biotechnology and Bioengineering, CeBiB, Universidad de Chile , Avenida Beauchef 851, Santiago 8320000,
- Centro Asistencial de Docencia e Investigación, CADI, Universidad de Magallanes , Av. Los Flamencos 01364, Punta Arenas 6210005,
- Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry (DE)
- PEACCEL, Artificial Intelligence Department, AI for Biologics , Paris 75013,
- Centre for Biotechnology and Bioengineering (CL)
- Corresponding author
- Uribe-Paredes, Roberto
- Medina-Ortiz, David
- ORCID
- Venue
- Database
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 2024
- ISSN
- 1758-0463 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11734279
- OpenAlex
- W4404204929
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 4.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Database (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Universidad de Chile (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SPP2363)
- Centre for Biotechnology and Bioengineering (FB0001)
- Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ATE220016, FB0001)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- peptide annotation, protein language models, machine learning prediction
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Amino Acid Sequence, Peptides, User-Computer Interface, Internet, Databases, Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review