Cited by 1,879Chemical Synthesis and AnalysisNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis

Therapeutic peptides: Historical perspectives, current development trends, and future directions

Open access
Lau, Jolene L., Dunn, Michael K.·2018·Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

Peptide therapeutics have played a notable role in medical practice since the advent of insulin therapy in the 1920s. Over 60 peptide drugs are approved in the United States and other major markets, and peptides continue to enter clinical development at a steady pace. Peptide drug discovery has diversified beyond its traditional focus on endogenous human peptides to include a broader range of structures identified from other natural sources or through medicinal chemistry efforts. We maintain a comprehensive dataset on peptides that have entered human clinical studies that includes over 150 peptides in active development today. Here we provide an overview of the peptide therapeutic landscape, including historical perspectives, molecular characteristics, regulatory benchmarks, and a therapeutic area breakdown.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bmc.2017.06.052

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Peptides and proteins have better selectivity for human specific targets, better biological activity, and lower toxicity than small molecules.

    “Peptides (2–50 amino acids) and proteins (more than 50 amino acids) have better selectivity for human specific targets. The larger molecular size and diverse quaternary structure enhance their interaction with specific protein pockets, making peptides and protein drugs have better biological activity and lower toxicity than small molecules.294,295”

    From Smart nanoparticles for cancer therapy (2023) · cites this paper as [294]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lau, J. L., & Dunn, M. K.
Affiliations
Ferring Research Institute (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Dunn, Michael K.
Venue
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
26
Issue
10
Pages
2700-2707
ISSN
0968-0896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2724823461
Cited by
1,879
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 146 · 2025: 179 · 2024: 205 · 2023: 236 · 2022: 299 · 2021: 275 · 2020: 278 · 2019: 194 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
13.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Keywords
peptide therapeutics, peptide drug discovery, clinical development, insulin, therapeutic areas
MeSH terms
Animals, Drug Evaluation, Humans, Peptides, Drug Approval, Drug Discovery, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review