Cited by 48Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksAdvanced Text Analysis Techniques

Pressing needs of biomedical text mining in biocuration and beyond: opportunities and challenges

Open access
Singhal, Ayush, Leaman, Robert, Catlett, Natalie, Lemberger, Thomas, McEntyre, Johanna, Polson, Shawn, Xenarios, Ioannis, Arighi, Cecilia +1 more·2016·Database

Abstract

Text mining in the biomedical sciences is rapidly transitioning from small-scale evaluation to large-scale application. In this article, we argue that text-mining technologies have become essential tools in real-world biomedical research. We describe four large scale applications of text mining, as showcased during a recent panel discussion at the BioCreative V Challenge Workshop. We draw on these applications as case studies to characterize common requirements for successfully applying text-mining techniques to practical biocuration needs. We note that system 'accuracy' remains a challenge and identify several additional common difficulties and potential research directions including (i) the 'scalability' issue due to the increasing need of mining information from millions of full-text articles, (ii) the 'interoperability' issue of integrating various text-mining systems into existing curation workflows and (iii) the 'reusability' issue on the difficulty of applying trained systems to text genres that are not seen previously during development. We then describe related efforts within the text-mining community, with a special focus on the BioCreative series of challenge workshops. We believe that focusing on the near-term challenges identified in this work will amplify the opportunities afforded by the continued adoption of text-mining tools. Finally, in order to sustain the curation ecosystem and have text-mining systems adopted for practical benefits, we call for increased collaboration between text-mining researchers and various stakeholders, including researchers, publishers and biocurators.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/database/baw161

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reduced precision achieved by S&B when applied to an unknown corpus reflects previous experiences from mining gene and protein symbols from text.

    “The reduced precision achieved by S&B when applied to an unknown corpus reflects previous experiences from mining gene and protein symbols from text [54].”

    From Semi-automated fact-checking of nucleotide sequence reagents in biomedical research publications: The Seek & Blastn tool (2019) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Research community section (page unavailable) reports that performance in BioCreative Gene Normalization challenges dropped significantly on full texts compared with abstracts. The Reusability section also discusses difficulty generalizing text-mining systems to previously unseen text. These passages support the analogy, but they do not specifically report reduced precision or evaluate S&B on an unknown corpus. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [16]Matis-Mitchell S. Roberts P. Tudor C.O. Arighi C.N. (2013) BioCreative IV interactive task. Proceedings of the Fourth BioCreative Challenge Evaluation Workshop, vol 1. Bethesda, MD, pp. 190–203.
  2. [19]Singhal A. Kasturi R. Sivakumar V. (2013) Leveraging web intelligence for finding interesting research datasets. Proceedings of the International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT). 2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM. IEEE, vol. 1, pp. 321– 328.
  3. [25]Fluck J. Madan S. Ansari S. (2014) BELIEF-a Semiautomatic Workflow for BEL Network Creation. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Semantic Mining in Biomedicine (SMBM), University of Aveiro, Portugal, 109– 113.
  4. [42]Verspoor K. Baumgartner W. Jr Roeder C. (2009) Abstracting the types away from a UIMA type system. In C. Chiarcos, R. Eckhart de Castilho, M. Stede (Eds.), Form to Meaning: Processing Texts Automatically, pp. 249–256.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singhal, A., Leaman, R., Catlett, N., Lemberger, T., McEntyre, J., Polson, S., Xenarios, I., Arighi, C., & Lu, Z.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Selventa (United States) (US)
  • European Molecular Biology Organization (DE)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • Delaware Biotechnology Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Arighi, Cecilia
  • Lu, Zhiyong
Venue
Database
Published
2016
Volume
2016
Pages
baw161
ISSN
1758-0463 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2564387948
Cited by
48
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Database (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1356374)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0010838)
  • Wellcome Trust (098231/Z/12/Z)
  • Australian Government
  • Robert Bosch Stiftung
  • SystemsX.ch
  • National Institutes of Health (GM103446)
  • Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R13GM109648, P20GM103446)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
Keywords
biomedical text mining, biocuration, scalability, interoperability, reusability, system accuracy, curation workflows, stakeholder collaboration
MeSH terms
Biomedical Research, Data Mining, Data Curation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review