The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of the Coding Sequences of Unidentified Human Genes. IX. The Complete Sequences of 100 New cDNA Clones from Brain Which Can Code for Large Proteins in vitro
Open accessAbstract
As an extension of our cDNA analysis for deducing the coding sequences of unidentified human genes, we have newly determined the sequences of 100 cDNA clones from a set of size-fractionated human brain cDNA libraries, and predicted the coding sequences of the corresponding genes, named KIAA0611 to KIAA0710. In vitro transcription-coupled translation assay was applied as the first screening to select cDNA clones which produce proteins with apparent molecular mass of 50 kDa and over. One hundred unidentified cDNA clones thus selected were then subjected to sequencing of entire inserts. The average size of the inserts and corresponding open reading frames was 4.9 kb and 2.8 kb (922 amino acid residues), respectively. Computer search of the sequences against the public databases indicated that predicted coding sequences of 87 genes were similar to those of known genes, 62% of which (54 genes) were categorized as proteins related to cell signaling/communication, cell structure/motility and nucleic acid management. The expression profiles in 10 human tissues of all the clones characterized in this study were examined by reverse transcription-coupled polymerase chain reaction and the chromosomal locations of the clones were determined by using human-rodent hybrid panels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Laporte, J., Hu, L. J., Kretz, C., Mandel, J.-L., Kioschis, P., Coy, J. F., Klauck, S. M., Poustka, A., & Dahl, N. (1996) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0696-175 · Cited by 639
Cited by
Delettre, C., Lenaers, G., Griffoin, J.-M., Gigarel, N., Lorenzo, C., Belenguer, P., Pelloquin, L., Grosgeorge, J., Turc-Carel, C., Perret, E., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/79936 · Cited by 1,446
Structure of TPR Domain–Peptide Complexes
Scheufler, C., Brinker, A., Bourenkov, G., Pegoraro, S., Moroder, L., Bartunik, H., Hartl, F. U., & Moarefi, I. (2000) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80830-2 · Cited by 1,188
A Differential Response of Two Putative Mammalian Circadian Regulators, mper1and mper2, to Light
Albrecht, U., Sun, Z. S., Eichele, G., & Lee, C. C. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80495-x · Cited by 879
p115 RhoGEF, a GTPase Activating Protein for Gα 12 and Gα 13
Kozasa, T., Jiang, X., Hart, M. J., Sternweis, P. M., Singer, W. D., Gilman, A. G., Bollag, G., & Sternweis, P. C. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5372.2109 · Cited by 854
Mechanism of regulation of WAVE1-induced actin nucleation by Rac1 and Nck
Eden, S., Rohatgi, R., Podtelejnikov, A. V., Mann, M., & Kirschner, M. W. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00859 · Cited by 835
Metadata
- Authors
- Nagase, T.
- Venue
- DNA Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-39
- ISSN
- 1340-2838 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121071095
- Cited by
- 842
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 34.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of the Coding Sequences of Unidentified Human Genes. IX. The Complete Sequences of 100 New cDNA Clones from Brain Which Can Code for Large Proteins in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/dnares/5.1.31
- The paper
- Nagase, T. (1998). Prediction of the Coding Sequences of Unidentified Human Genes. IX. The Complete Sequences of 100 New cDNA Clones from Brain Which Can Code for Large Proteins in vitro. DNA Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/5.1.31
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
