Cited by 45Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Accuracy of information given by ChatGPT for patients with inflammatory bowel disease in relation to ECCO guidelines

Open access
Sciberras, Martina, Farrugia, Yvette, Gordon, Hannah, Furfaro, Federica, Allocca, Mariangela, Torres, Joana, Arebi, Naila, Fiorino, Gionata +9 more·2024·Journal of Crohn's and Colitis

Abstract

Background: As acceptance of artificial intelligence [AI] platforms increases, more patients will consider these tools as sources of information. The ChatGPT architecture utilizes a neural network to process natural language, thus generating responses based on the context of input text. The accuracy and completeness of ChatGPT3.5 in the context of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] remains unclear. Methods: In this prospective study, 38 questions worded by IBD patients were inputted into ChatGPT3.5. The following topics were covered: [1] Crohn’s disease [CD], ulcerative colitis [UC], and malignancy; [2] maternal medicine; [3] infection and vaccination; and [4] complementary medicine. Responses given by ChatGPT were assessed for accuracy [1—completely incorrect to 5—completely correct] and completeness [3-point Likert scale; range 1—incomplete to 3—complete] by 14 expert gastroenterologists, in comparison with relevant ECCO guidelines. Results: In terms of accuracy, most replies [84.2%] had a median score of ≥4 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2) and a mean score of 3.87 [SD: ±0.6]. For completeness, 34.2% of the replies had a median score of 3 and 55.3% had a median score of between 2 and <3. Overall, the mean rating was 2.24 [SD: ±0.4, median: 2, IQR: 1]. Though groups 3 and 4 had a higher mean for both accuracy and completeness, there was no significant scoring variation between the four question groups [Kruskal–Wallis test p > 0.05]. However, statistical analysis for the different individual questions revealed a significant difference for both accuracy [p < 0.001] and completeness [p < 0.001]. The questions which rated the highest for both accuracy and completeness were related to smoking, while the lowest rating was related to screening for malignancy and vaccinations especially in the context of immunosuppression and family planning. Conclusion: This is the first study to demonstrate the capability of an AI-based system to provide accurate and comprehensive answers to real-world patient queries in IBD. AI systems may serve as a useful adjunct for patients, in addition to standard of care in clinics and validated patient information resources. However, responses in specialist areas may deviate from evidence-based guidance and the replies need to give more firm advice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae040

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous work evaluated the performance of ChatGPT-3.5 in answering IBD-related questions based on ECCO guidelines.

    “Previous work evaluated the performance of ChatGPT-3.5 in answering IBD-related questions based on the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) guidelines (Sciberras et al., 2024).”
  • A recent study showed that an AI-based system could provide accurate and comprehensive answers to real-world patient questions related to IBD.

    “A recent study showed that an AI-based system could provide accurate and comprehensive answers to real-world patient questions related to IBD (Sciberras et al., 2024).”
  • That prior study demonstrated a generally high level of accuracy but reported limited completeness of responses, particularly in complex scenarios such as malignancy screening, vaccination, and family planning.

    “While that study demonstrated a generally high level of accuracy, it also reported limited completeness of responses, particularly in complex scenarios such as malignancy screening, vaccination, and family planning.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sciberras, M., Farrugia, Y., Gordon, H., Furfaro, F., Allocca, M., Torres, J., Arebi, N., Fiorino, G., Iacucci, M., Verstockt, B., Magro, F., Katsanos, K., Busuttil, J., De Giovanni, K., Fenech, V. A., Chetcuti Zammit, S., & Ellul, P.
Affiliations
  • Mater Dei Hospital (MT)
  • Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • St Mark's Hospital (GB)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini (IT)
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • University of Ioannina (GR)
  • Association for Crohn`s and Colitis , Malta
  • Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Mater Dei Hospital , Msida , Malta
Corresponding author
Sciberras, Martina
Venue
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Published
2024-03-23
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
1215-1221
ISSN
  • 1873-9946 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-4479
OpenAlex
W4393111455
Cited by
45
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 5
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Crohn s and Colitis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
ChatGPT, large language models
MeSH terms
Complementary Therapies, Artificial Intelligence, Colitis, Ulcerative, Crohn Disease, Female, Humans, Natural Language Processing, Neoplasms, Patient Education as Topic, Prospective Studies, Vaccination, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review